|
|
Post by itellthefuture777 on Jan 28, 2019 23:29:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by longliner on Jan 29, 2019 13:59:30 GMT -5
I must say given the ferocity of the current short attack, both verbally and financially, it doesn't hurt my feelings to have some money in the bank! Maybe the CEO of the year saw this one coming.  |
|
|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Jan 29, 2019 14:28:37 GMT -5
I must say given the ferocity of the current short attack, both verbally and financially, it doesn't hurt my feelings to have some money in the bank! Maybe the CEO of the year saw this one coming. I was thinking the same thing. As the shorts have proven time and time again, they are not just going to go away. Mike has a game plan that we do not fully understand yet. He had to gauge what was the best time to raise funding to execute the game plan. If the shorts can distrupt that game plan in anyway they will. All of us including the shorts expected the next fund raise to occur in about 3 to 6 months. So they would have attacked to drop the share price to make raising money as expensive as possible. Mike did a preemptive strike which didn’t allow the shorts to manipulate the price around the time he raised funds. Mike can now focus for the next year on executing his plan. So as the CEO he had to gauge market funding which appears to be drying up along with manipulation of our stock to determine the best time to raise funds. Not an easy tightrope to walk. Time will tell if he was right. But he has done a great job in my opinion since he came on as CEO. |
|
|
|
Post by bigchungus91354 on Jan 29, 2019 14:49:36 GMT -5
I must say given the ferocity of the current short attack, both verbally and financially, it doesn't hurt my feelings to have some money in the bank! Maybe the CEO of the year saw this one coming. Are we allowed to nominate him, again, for 2019? |
|
|
|
Post by longliner on Jan 29, 2019 14:50:53 GMT -5
I must say given the ferocity of the current short attack, both verbally and financially, it doesn't hurt my feelings to have some money in the bank! Maybe the CEO of the year saw this one coming. Are we allowed to nominate him, again, for 2019? I believe you are allowed to do anything you would like in this regard. |
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Jan 29, 2019 17:16:44 GMT -5
I posted about nominating Mike a month ago. The time for nominating him has now passed. We'll see soon whether enough people chose to do so or not. mnkd.proboards.com/thread/10750/2019-appa-pharmaceutical-industry-awardsThat thread was viewed over 250 times, yet no one spoke up in it to support Mike. Understandably, at the time he wasn't the most popular guy (due to the public offering etc.). |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jan 29, 2019 17:25:55 GMT -5
I'll be more than happy to vote for him thousands of times in 2020. 2019 is the year to deliver.
|
|
|
|
Post by traderdennis on Jan 30, 2019 9:19:30 GMT -5
I posted about nominating Mike a month ago. The time for nominating him has now passed. We'll see soon whether enough people chose to do so or not. mnkd.proboards.com/thread/10750/2019-appa-pharmaceutical-industry-awardsThat thread was viewed over 250 times, yet no one spoke up in it to support Mike. Understandably, at the time he wasn't the most popular guy (due to the public offering etc.). Might have something to do about a decline of 60 percent plus in stock price for 2018. |
|
|
|
Post by barnstormer on Jan 30, 2019 9:27:21 GMT -5
I posted about nominating Mike a month ago. The time for nominating him has now passed. We'll see soon whether enough people chose to do so or not. mnkd.proboards.com/thread/10750/2019-appa-pharmaceutical-industry-awardsThat thread was viewed over 250 times, yet no one spoke up in it to support Mike. Understandably, at the time he wasn't the most popular guy (due to the public offering etc.). Brandicourt would have a better chance of winning than Mike. You need more than a "cleaned up balance sheet" to make CEO of the year when your share price is just over a buck. If the stock ever gets over $6 I'll vote for him again. |
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Jan 30, 2019 9:42:53 GMT -5
Perhaps if he would become CEO our share price would jump immediately. Someone call him
|
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Jan 30, 2019 9:47:00 GMT -5
Viehbacher (former Sanofi CEO who penned the Afrezza deal) = Yes Brandecourt (current Sanofi CEO who dumped the deal) = No  |
|
|
|
Post by bigchungus91354 on Jan 30, 2019 10:06:17 GMT -5
I posted about nominating Mike a month ago. The time for nominating him has now passed. We'll see soon whether enough people chose to do so or not. mnkd.proboards.com/thread/10750/2019-appa-pharmaceutical-industry-awardsThat thread was viewed over 250 times, yet no one spoke up in it to support Mike. Understandably, at the time he wasn't the most popular guy (due to the public offering etc.). Brandicourt would have a better chance of winning than Mike. You need more than a "cleaned up balance sheet" to make CEO of the year when your share price is just over a buck. If the stock ever gets over $6 I'll vote for him again. Come on, that's a lot of pressure for the guy. A reasonable measure of success would be an increase of 10%. If he could increase the SP by 50% and get this up to 1.80, he would certainly deserve CEO of the year, that's a phenomenal achievement for any CEO! Don't you think? |
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Jan 30, 2019 10:17:58 GMT -5
Viehbacher (former Sanofi CEO who penned the Afrezza deal) = Yes Brandecourt (current Sanofi CEO who dumped the deal) = No Is it possible to give a thumbs up plus? Maybe two thumbs up, something? |
|
|
|
Post by barnstormer on Jan 30, 2019 10:20:17 GMT -5
Brandicourt would have a better chance of winning than Mike. You need more than a "cleaned up balance sheet" to make CEO of the year when your share price is just over a buck. If the stock ever gets over $6 I'll vote for him again. Come on, that's a lot of pressure for the guy. A reasonable measure of success would be an increase of 10%. If he could increase the SP by 50% and get this up to 1.80, he would certainly deserve CEO of the year, that's a phenomenal achievement for any CEO! Don't you think? You would have to factor in how much share price lost from it's 2018 high of $3.04 under his watch. He has added invisible partnerships, dilution, ect. I don't think his performance rates much consideration to date. |
|
|
|
Post by mango on Jan 30, 2019 10:21:47 GMT -5
Brandicourt would have a better chance of winning than Mike. You need more than a "cleaned up balance sheet" to make CEO of the year when your share price is just over a buck. If the stock ever gets over $6 I'll vote for him again. Come on, that's a lot of pressure for the guy. A reasonable measure of success would be an increase of 10%. If he could increase the SP by 50% and get this up to 1.80, he would certainly deserve CEO of the year, that's a phenomenal achievement for any CEO! Don't you think? I don't think so |
|
