|
Post by mango on Jun 25, 2019 19:09:12 GMT -5
Health claims is what we want. Anyone can already purchase CBD topicals, tinctures, flowers, edibles, etc from companies via in person and/or online. Legitimate ones openly disclose who the growers are, the extraction methods, provide chemical analyses and ingredient lists, etc
The company that Walgreens is using is Curaleaf. Curaleaf doesn't provide hardly any pertinent information that I would want to know compared to the companies that I have personally purchased from and know of. There is absolutely nothing special about what Walgreen, CVS, RiteAid, Walmart, etc are providing here. Actually, what they are doing is down-right deceptive and wrong, IMO—they are simply taking advantage of, and hoping to cash in on, the "CBD craze" via naive and ill-information consumers. They literally hope to froth in the fad, like so many companies hope to do and those that are currently doing so. It is my thinking that RLS will pursue health claims with some, if not all, of their OTC products—otherwise, what's the use? This arena isn't harbored with cute, friendly dolphins—it's polluted with a new species—one that is more greedy, hungry, deceptive and relentless than anything planet Earth has ever seen.
Our Position of Strength is our science. If we use it wisely, patiently, and methodically—we can win.
But, that's just mytakeonit
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Jun 26, 2019 2:48:08 GMT -5
The who’s who of the Receptor SAB is quite an impressive collection of scientists. I would love to hear the pitch they were given about Receptor’s future prospects, and if they were all made aware of who’s behind the curtain there.
|
|