|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 9, 2019 7:35:28 GMT -5
Falcon ......Well I think many people would feel and walk a lot easier and safer with him on the board ..and you can always email him, at least you know you’ll get through and get a response.
|
|
|
|
Post by theebavarian on Dec 9, 2019 7:37:33 GMT -5
The facts are that Director Hooper is simply replacing retired Director MacCallum's seat and it's reasonable to assume that the addition of the new Director is not some attempt to prevent HfM from securing a majority of the Board votes via the nomination process. As I said the other day, I prefer facts over fiction.  A very wise position MN, which is why I assume most shareholders support you for the board. I do have a question for you. I assume if elected you would have to discontinue all communication on this board? Obviously you wouldn't be able to communicate any non public information. We shall miss your even handed wisdom. " which is why I assume most shareholders support you for the board"? No disrespect to you or MN, but this is a very strong assertion which bares little basis in reality. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 9, 2019 7:43:07 GMT -5
How do you know it isn’t reality? That’s your assumption. It’s very probably the case.
But that’s fine because I go by my gut:-) I also think part of that board member nomination was a power-play. It may not look like it but things aren’t always how they seem on the outside.
|
|
|
|
Post by theebavarian on Dec 9, 2019 8:01:26 GMT -5
Falcon's assertion was a complete assumption too. And based on simple logic there is a greater likelihood at this point in time that his assertion is more incorrect than correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by golfeveryday on Dec 9, 2019 8:22:04 GMT -5
Falcon ......Well I think many people would feel and walk a lot easier and safer with him on the board ..and you can always email him, at least you know you’ll get through and get a response. I support Mnholdem on the board for sure |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Dec 9, 2019 8:54:25 GMT -5
The facts are that Director Hooper is simply replacing retired Director MacCallum's seat and it's reasonable to assume that the addition of the new Director is not some attempt to prevent HfM from securing a majority of the Board votes via the nomination process. As I said the other day, I prefer facts over fiction. if this is true, which I am quite sure it is, then Bill McCulloughs recent letter to shareholders was highly unnecessary and too reactionary. Not at all. In fact, I do agree with Mr. McCullough that the Board of Directors may be too heavily weighted with pharmaceutical executives. |
|
|
|
Post by uvula on Dec 9, 2019 9:16:48 GMT -5
When someone says "I assume..." it means they are making an assumption, not stating a proven fact. I would have assumed this was self explanatory.
|
|
|
|
Post by akemp3000 on Dec 9, 2019 11:15:09 GMT -5
Seems to me the most important and logical assumption in the bigger picture is that there will be insufficient shares to make any changes to the board. I'm not necessarily saying this is a good thing, just sharing an assumption since that seems to be the current topic. The basis for this assumption is that the current level of support for change seems to be in the 20 percentile range and the major players, i.e. those not in the 20 percentile, seem to support MC and the current board. This should play out once we get closer to voting time and all parties have the opportunity to state their case.
|
|
|
|
Post by wgreystone on Dec 9, 2019 11:19:11 GMT -5
Seems to me the most important and logical assumption in the bigger picture is that there will be insufficient shares to make any changes to the board. I'm not necessarily saying this is a good thing, just sharing an assumption since that seems to be the current topic. The basis for this assumption is that the current level of support for change seems to be in the 20 percentile range and the major players, i.e. those not in the 20 percentile, seem to support MC and the current board. This should play out once we get closer to voting time and all parties have the opportunity to state their case. How many shares voted in the last ASM? This 20% shareholders are likely to vote in the next ASM. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 9, 2019 11:46:56 GMT -5
This is just my assumption from what I can assess. Outside of the institutions ... Retail shares ...1/3 are MC supporters. 1/3 are HfM supporters. 1/3 just want MC gone and don’t like HfM at all.
There’s thousands of people that read this board and I’d say almost three-quarter’s of them would love mnholdem on the BOD. But who knows for sure. 🤷♀️
|
|
|
|
Post by winner on Dec 9, 2019 12:02:49 GMT -5
mnholdem has my support.
|
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Dec 9, 2019 12:19:29 GMT -5
I'd like to see your statistical information. I would NOT be one who supports the candidacy of mnholdem and not only do I not love him I dislike him. Should he seek the position IMHO he should leave this board as a moderator of this board which is not and should not be a platform for his voice as a candidate. If he has the credentials then let him present them in the process of application to the board of directors and then your 1/3 can vote for him.. This is a place for conversation; nothing more; nothing less. Show the proof of your presumption of numbers please; because as we know, anyone can say anything and it doesn't mean squat. Mnholdem speaks too often for my liking as a Moderator, which gives him credibility to some but Not to me. I'd love to see how you come up with these statistics of your "buddy club". I have too many shares and too much time invested to give a seat to the likes of mnholdem and if you think that this board should give hime free time and constant access to shareholder's votes then You clearly don't understand how deeply your obsession is sounding more like desperation.
That's all I have to say on this issue. I speak for myself; not imagined others without proof. Have a good day!
|
|
|
|
Post by uvula on Dec 9, 2019 12:44:35 GMT -5
I haven't seen a single post where mnholdem was campaigning for office. I also don't think it would be wrong if he did. (Here are my statistics: 100% of uvulas agree with this position.)
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 9, 2019 13:05:19 GMT -5
I said it’s my assumption, I have no proof all. All I have is the fact that I am in touch personally and privately with over 100 shareholders. I am on three message boards and inside those message boards I am in multiple private threads, some with 50+ people a piece in them. So from where I am positioned that’s what I assess to be a good guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by golfeveryday on Dec 9, 2019 13:37:05 GMT -5
if this is true, which I am quite sure it is, then Bill McCulloughs recent letter to shareholders was highly unnecessary and too reactionary. Not at all. In fact, I do agree with Mr. McCullough that the Board of Directors may be too heavily weighted with pharmaceutical executives. I agree the board could do with 1 or 2 non industry board members that are very successful in business. However, the remainder should be from Pharma and Med Device. The current board members quite frankly are old school. They need to be better about picking these people. Lots of good candidates out there with excellent backgrounds not necessarily with the old school mentality. |
|
