|
|
Post by mango on Feb 17, 2020 10:29:34 GMT -5
Does management deserve to stay?
Well, so far,
YES: 44
NO: 43
----------------------------
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by longliner on Feb 17, 2020 10:33:15 GMT -5
Does management deserve to stay? Well, so far, YES: 44 NO: 43 ---------------------------- Interesting. I guess we may soon find out which side has more shares. |
|
|
|
Post by mango on Feb 17, 2020 10:41:06 GMT -5
Does management deserve to stay? Well, so far, YES: 44 NO: 43 ---------------------------- Interesting. I guess we may soon find out which side has more shares. Well, I may be wrong but what I actually find interesting is that the "Do you support HFM" poll does not accurately reflect this poll. If I remember correctly, very few votes supported HFM. So, we have one of a few things going on here: 1) Fake accounts are voting NO 2) New/Former voters against HFM have turned views 3) The NO votes represented here does not necessarily mean a YES vote for HFM ------------------------------ But, that's just mango'stakeonit |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 17, 2020 11:13:03 GMT -5
I guess we may soon find out which side has more shares. Well, I may be wrong but what I actually find interesting is that the "Do you support HFM" poll does not accurately reflect this poll. If I remember correctly, very few votes supported HFM. So, we have one of a few things going on here: 1) Fake accounts are voting NO 2) New/Former voters against HFM have turned views 3) The NO votes represented here does not necessarily mean a YES vote for HFM ------------------------------ But, that's just mango'stakeonit I’m pretty good at investor sentiment ..and this is what I’ve noticed, 1/3 of the people are in HFM.( some want Mike gone, some just want plain change. 1/3 of the people are Mike fans. And... 1/3 of the people do not like HFM... they just want MC gone. And those people aren’t fake ...they are pissed. And they don’t like Bill either! 😎 |
|
|
|
Post by sweedee79 on Feb 17, 2020 11:14:36 GMT -5
I didn't think this Poll had anything to do with HFM.. I voted NO on this management team..
There are 11 yes votes that will be turning into a no soon as well.. Mike has made too many mistakes.. It's time to turn that around or find someone who can..
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 17, 2020 11:21:14 GMT -5
There are some big shareholders in HFM, but the biggest shareholders in HFM are mankind longs I know in New York, and they count for a lot of shares so that’s why am saying 1/3 are in HFM. They do not post on Pro-Boards. That is not enough for a majority so it’s the 1/3 that want Mike gone that will make the difference because you don’t know who they’re going to vote for ..they could vote for Mike being gone, not vote for Bill, but yet vote for mnholdem.
|
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Feb 17, 2020 11:52:13 GMT -5
Does management deserve to stay? Well, so far, YES: 44 NO: 43 ---------------------------- Interesting. As of now: YES: 39 NO: 48 This is including the first choice as a No, since anybody choosing it obviously does not believe management deserves to stay. |
|
|
|
Post by mango on Feb 17, 2020 11:58:06 GMT -5
Does management deserve to stay? Well, so far, YES: 44 NO: 43 ---------------------------- Interesting. As of now: YES: 39 NO: 48 This is including the first choice as a No, since anybody choosing it obviously does not believe management deserves to stay. The thread title question is "Does this management deserve to stay?" 28+11+5 = 44 YES 42+1 = 43 NO Since majority of the polling answers are strangely worded anyway, even if we take the first YES polling answer at face value, it still does not fall under NO, IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by stockwhisperer on Feb 17, 2020 12:15:50 GMT -5
Posting this a 3rd place - hoping more than a couple of people might see it’s importance... So, here’s the question I keep asking. Matt (on PBs) talked about it quite a bit a while back, explaining important details & facts about - what sounded like, a costly, time consuming process around contacting ALL SH’s. It seemed, must people just skated over it and went to something else. The clock is ticking. If there really are more than 60,000 MNKD shareholders - irrelevant of the tiny group, in comparison - that says what they think around here... HOW, WHEN & BY WHOM - ARE THE 60,000+ SHAREHOLDERS GOING tO BE ADVISED ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON & VOTING? When will these questions be answered and who can answer them?
|
|
|
|
Post by longliner on Feb 17, 2020 14:34:24 GMT -5
Posting this a 3rd place - hoping more than a couple of people might see it’s importance... So, here’s the question I keep asking. Matt (on PBs) talked about it quite a bit a while back, explaining important details & facts about - what sounded like, a costly, time consuming process around contacting ALL SH’s. It seemed, must people just skated over it and went to something else. The clock is ticking. If there really are more than 60,000 MNKD shareholders - irrelevant of the tiny group, in comparison - that says what they think around here... HOW, WHEN & BY WHOM - ARE THE 60,000+ SHAREHOLDERS GOING tO BE ADVISED ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON & VOTING? When will these questions be answered byuand who can answer them? I don't know if this addresses your question, there are over 35,000 watchers on Stocktwits I assume a large % are investors. |
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Feb 17, 2020 14:42:12 GMT -5
Posting this a 3rd place - hoping more than a couple of people might see it’s importance... So, here’s the question I keep asking. Matt (on PBs) talked about it quite a bit a while back, explaining important details & facts about - what sounded like, a costly, time consuming process around contacting ALL SH’s. It seemed, must people just skated over it and went to something else. The clock is ticking. If there really are more than 60,000 MNKD shareholders - irrelevant of the tiny group, in comparison - that says what they think around here... HOW, WHEN & BY WHOM - ARE THE 60,000+ SHAREHOLDERS GOING tO BE ADVISED ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON & VOTING? When will these questions be answered and who can answer them? That would be the DEF 14A form that you are either mailed or download depending on whether you have selected electronic delivery or not. It is a regulatory requirement that this is provided to every shareholder every year. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 17, 2020 14:46:53 GMT -5
Posting this a 3rd place - hoping more than a couple of people might see it’s importance... So, here’s the question I keep asking. Matt (on PBs) talked about it quite a bit a while back, explaining important details & facts about - what sounded like, a costly, time consuming process around contacting ALL SH’s. It seemed, must people just skated over it and went to something else. The clock is ticking. If there really are more than 60,000 MNKD shareholders - irrelevant of the tiny group, in comparison - that says what they think around here... HOW, WHEN & BY WHOM - ARE THE 60,000+ SHAREHOLDERS GOING tO BE ADVISED ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON & VOTING? When will these questions be answered byuand who can answer them? I don't know if this addresses your question, there are over 35,000 watchers on Stocktwits I assume a large % are investors. I think you are correct, and there’s 3,500 on here but some of them would be crossovers. And does that number count the institutional funds? |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Feb 17, 2020 15:12:26 GMT -5
There are a number of possibilities regarding candidates inclusion on the company's proxy for annual shareholder voting. The shareholder recommendations for new directors may still be being evaluated by the BoD's Nominating and Governance Committee. As one of those persons who was recommended, I was contacted by MannKind Corporation and was required to complete and submit specific information. I also received the results (by USPS) of the results of company's background check. I have not yet been informed by the company as to whether the Committee has qualified these new shareholder recommendations or whether they have been deemed as nominees for inclusion on the 2020 proxy vote for board directors. A shareholder/group with 3% of outstanding shares can notify the company of their intent to require that MannKind include their nominees on the company's proxy materials per SEC Rule 14a-11. A shareholder, or group like HfM, can also make this request official by filing a Schedule 14N with the SEC, but I have not been informed of any SEC filing to date, so I assume that the corporation is still working with HfM to process the director recommendations. --- Again, I should remind you that I was recommended to the company for a directors position by the activist shareholder group known as HopeForMannKind (HfM) based on recommendations by shareholders, but I am not actively participating with HfM nor am I aware of their current activities. Regardless, Bill has a history of sharing news when it happens, so I assume that there have been no recent developments or communications from MannKind Corporation. Last year, as I recall, the official proxy mailing date was March 28. I don't know when MannKind Corporation will be scheduling its ASM this year, but I suspect that we'll hear something soon regarding the HfM recommendations.  |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Feb 17, 2020 15:28:48 GMT -5
I doubt that 60,000 MNKD shareholder number. Total shares outstanding is 206,410,000. Unless the funds are counted as each member in that fund, then that number is too high. At pps being less than $2, I doubt that people will have only have a few hundred shares. Also keep in mind that if Mike C and company are so bad ... the shorts will vote to keep them in.
206,410,000/60,000 = 3,440 But, if you eliminate the funds and my shares ... then you only have about 100 shares per shareholder. (Remember that I'm an accountant)
But, that's mytakeonit
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 17, 2020 16:38:33 GMT -5
I doubt that 60,000 MNKD shareholder number. Total shares outstanding is 206,410,000. Unless the funds are counted as each member in that fund, then that number is too high. At pps being less than $2, I doubt that people will have only have a few hundred shares. Also keep in mind that if Mike C and company are so bad ... the shorts will vote to keep them in. 206,410,000/60,000 = 3,440 But, if you eliminate the funds and my shares ... then you only have about 100 shares per shareholder. (Remember that I'm an accountant) But, that's mytakeonit Agree, I knew someone would know the answer to that question:-) As is what I suspected. |
|
