|
Post by morfu on Apr 1, 2020 7:57:23 GMT -5
While I am also strictly against any avoidable dilution, you make little sense to me! The last partner was Sanofi and took in effect about 2/3 of the profit away from Mannkind, this 30% dilution would be a lesser evil. Your proposed change of how to sell Afrezza might benefit VDex (even so I think this is only a short term thing, their business model is doomed, they are not effective, patients can go to normal endos and educate themself), but it certainly is not in the interest of Mannkind with a solid trend in sales over 2 years, no one will be so foolish to change the concept at this point, you can stop it already!
There is no need to dilute right now, debt financing seems a much smarter choice if needed at all, I hope Jennifer Grancio and the other board members act in the interest of the shareholders and stop that nonsense! Last time we gave the management a package like that so they "would have options", they gave it away without need and wasted my money, do not give them option is the conclusion, they should just focus on getting Afrezza on the road, nothing else is needed at the moment, so they don´t need to dilute my shares.
Plus I still want to know we got that 20% Christmas dilution package in 2018, it still smells bad!
I am not talking about Vdex, this has nothing to do with Vdex, this has to do with the Christmas massacre ..it looks like the same thing again when the share price is too low. It’s about the compensation. It’s about the possibility of another reverse split. And BTW you need to stop right now stalking my every post.
>> And BTW you need to stop right now stalking my every post. No, you need to stop trying to bully me, right here, right now! While I do understand that you might be annoyed, that someone thinks you pushing VDex too hard or even accusing your posts as scam, please disagree with me on the subject as much as you like, but keep that personal shit out of here!
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 1, 2020 8:04:13 GMT -5
I am not talking about Vdex, this has nothing to do with Vdex, this has to do with the Christmas massacre ..it looks like the same thing again when the share price is too low. It’s about the compensation. It’s about the possibility of another reverse split. And BTW you need to stop right now stalking my every post.
>> And BTW you need to stop right now stalking my every post. No, you need to stop trying to bully me, right here, right now! While I do understand that you might be annoyed, that someone thinks you pushing VDex too hard or even accusing your posts as scam, please disagree with me on the subject as much as you like, but keep that personal shit out of here!
My post was not about Vdex.
|
|
|
Post by otherottawaguy on Apr 1, 2020 8:09:09 GMT -5
So back on topic...
I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us...
Call me an optimist.
OOG
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Apr 1, 2020 8:10:11 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG Hope springs eternal.
|
|
|
Post by Clement on Apr 1, 2020 8:13:00 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG 43% increase in authorized number of shares .... but yeah
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Apr 1, 2020 8:18:00 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG 43% increase in authorized number of shares .... but yeah An announcement of anything good would have come first
|
|
|
Post by mango on Apr 1, 2020 8:25:49 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG Could be to fund compounds for rare lung diseases associated with and/or without COVID-19.
|
|
|
Post by rfogel on Apr 1, 2020 8:28:51 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG I would think more along the lines of possibly needing to rework the Mid-cap deal with modification of terms requiring dilution.
|
|
|
Post by thekid2499 on Apr 1, 2020 8:29:41 GMT -5
I'm not saying I'm happy about this. And doing it without any accompanying good news is going to lead to downward pressure on the share price. But did anyone really not expect this given the current environment?
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Apr 1, 2020 8:30:10 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG Could be to fund compounds for rare lung diseases associated with and/or without COVID-19. If that means the NIH is going to buy 100K shares for 2 Billion, bring it. Mannkind has not been that lucky in 20 years.
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Apr 1, 2020 8:32:15 GMT -5
So back on topic... I am wondering if there might be announcement coming from Mannkind that would support a doubling of the share count. Because if there isn't it looks as if there is a another reverse split coming at us... Call me an optimist. OOG I would think more along the lines of possibly needing to rework the Mid-cap deal with modification of terms requiring dilution. How long ago was MC quoted that things were just fine with Midcap? It seems like yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by barnstormer on Apr 1, 2020 8:35:12 GMT -5
The only good thing about the CV lockdown for Mike is he won't have to face angry investors like me and others at the ASM. Saved by the bug.
|
|
|
Post by rfogel on Apr 1, 2020 8:36:10 GMT -5
I would think more along the lines of possibly needing to rework the Mid-cap deal with modification of terms requiring dilution. How long ago was MC quoted that things were just fine with Midcap? It seems like yesterday. To be fair, covid has changed a lot of things. It may mean management is worried it won't meet revenue requirements and if Mid-cap ends up hurting for money themselves, maybe things won't be fine anymore.
|
|
|
Post by cjm18 on Apr 1, 2020 8:38:02 GMT -5
This was expected. Why all the fuss. New shares have to be voted on at the meeting. The meeting is always around a certain time of year.
|
|
|
Post by helmut8056 on Apr 1, 2020 8:39:09 GMT -5
Boy Mongo No. 1: that's a stretch! And No. 2: That's not saying much for what we should be doing with our existing pipe line.
|
|