|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 23, 2020 9:09:25 GMT -5
I think as far as shareholders go they have failed to lay out a plan that makes any sense that would make someone want to invest more money.. we don’t see confidence in a plan. Except for they’re switching back to T1 which is not good. Taking more money from shareholders at this point is unfortunate.
|
|
|
Post by hellodolly on Apr 23, 2020 9:13:48 GMT -5
I voted!
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Apr 23, 2020 17:48:40 GMT -5
This is a message from Castagna when he surprise diluted in Dec 2018. It has not aged well...
|
|
|
Post by MnkdWASmyRtrmntPlan on Apr 23, 2020 17:59:33 GMT -5
I just don’t see why long shareholders would vote no for the shares. I voted yes for the two new BOD members, no to the compensation, and a definite yes to the shares in three different accounts. We need the shares, even if mnkd fired Mike and everybody that shareholders are upset with, the Company and the new CEO would need shares to work with. Not getting the shares would not be good for anybody, it would surely force a reverse split as that would be the only way to fatten our shareprice. Those that vote no are asking mnkd to do a job without their most essential tool. I don’t understand the logic, some are letting their disregard for Mike allow them to make decisions that only slow the growth of the Company. Regardless of why, it’s not the right thing to do if you’re invested. You’re shooting yourselves in the foot. Good Luck regardless. ✌🏻😎 Because I can absolutely guarantee it will pass, common shareholders will not influence the voting at all. I'm voting "no" to send a message the only way I can that they should be more judicial with their authorized shares unlike last time. Oh, and if they get more shares (which they will) and dilute soon after like last time, we are headed to a reverse split anyways. Right, awesomo, we can't throw MC off the board, or fire him (although it would be funny if all the shareholders pants him or gave him a red-belly at the ASM). Sadly, all we can do is fart in his general direction.
|
|
|
Post by longliner on Apr 23, 2020 18:28:41 GMT -5
Because I can absolutely guarantee it will pass, common shareholders will not influence the voting at all. I'm voting "no" to send a message the only way I can that they should be more judicial with their authorized shares unlike last time. Oh, and if they get more shares (which they will) and dilute soon after like last time, we are headed to a reverse split anyways. Right, awesomo, we can't throw MC off the board, or fire him (although it would be funny if all the shareholders pants him or gave him a red-belly at the ASM). Sadly, all we can do is fart in his general direction. Well played!
|
|
|
Post by buyitonsale on Apr 23, 2020 19:15:49 GMT -5
There is no message to be sent by voting a certain way, the winner takes it all.
And nothing is decided until votes are counted.
You can be sure that those who take their investment seriously (either side) will be voting to win.
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Apr 23, 2020 19:42:55 GMT -5
Because I can absolutely guarantee it will pass, common shareholders will not influence the voting at all. I'm voting "no" to send a message the only way I can that they should be more judicial with their authorized shares unlike last time. Oh, and if they get more shares (which they will) and dilute soon after like last time, we are headed to a reverse split anyways. Right, awesomo, we can't throw MC off the board, or fire him (although it would be funny if all the shareholders pants him or gave him a red-belly at the ASM). Sadly, all we can do is fart in his general direction. I say we turn him into a newt! 🤣
|
|
|
Post by brentie on Apr 23, 2020 22:03:24 GMT -5
Right, awesomo, we can't throw MC off the board, or fire him (although it would be funny if all the shareholders pants him or gave him a red-belly at the ASM). Sadly, all we can do is fart in his general direction. I say we turn him into a newt! 🤣
|
|