|
Post by mango on Sept 15, 2020 8:28:42 GMT -5
So I don't expect UT to be a single one and done product. I think you will see us continue to partner and find opportunities to help patients in that space. Plus, everything else we are doing in the orphan lung, looking at things like interstitial lung disease, ILD, what else we may helping idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, there is whole bunch of different small lung disorders that we think our technology can make a huge difference. And so we are excited about those opportunities as well in the coming months and years that you will see in some of the work that we are doing.• LNG01 (formerly SM04646) is a Phase I development-stage small-molecule inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). LNG01 is a nebulized therapy, which has been shown to be safe in healthy volunteers and subjects with IPF in single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies respectively. (UT in-licensed NA rights for SM04646 from Samumed in 2018). pipeline.unither.com/product/lng01-formerly-sm04646-wnt-inhibitor/description/pipeline.unither.comNote: This molecule was specifically designed for inhalation. cystic fibrous? Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis/
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Sept 16, 2020 5:23:16 GMT -5
“✅ Not all pipeline candidates are on the website” The “too long” long group must be getting hungry again, and too long on the tooth to remember the MNKD playbook. Doesn’t this sound eerily like RLS? Or Torrey Pines and the pain program? mnkd.proboards.com/thread/4017/pain-management-plansI used to prod MNKD for their prolific use of the carrot and stick approach to keeping hungry investors eager for a breakthrough announcement and none ever came. It seems we got a short reprieve from this earlier this year, and now it starts anew with “undisclosed pipeline candidates”. How quickly we forget and forgive the tactics we’ve fallen for before. I’ll believe it when I see it.
|
|
|
Post by hellodolly on Sept 16, 2020 6:52:56 GMT -5
One of the better 'overall' presentations I've heard in a long while. I remain optimistic and look forward to the next few quarters.
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Sept 16, 2020 9:12:06 GMT -5
“✅ Not all pipeline candidates are on the website” The “too long” long group must be getting hungry again, and too long on the tooth to remember the MNKD playbook. Doesn’t this sound eerily like RLS? Or Torrey Pines and the pain program? mnkd.proboards.com/thread/4017/pain-management-plansI used to prod MNKD for their prolific use of the carrot and stick approach to keeping hungry investors eager for a breakthrough announcement and none ever came. It seems we got a short reprieve from this earlier this year, and now it starts anew with “undisclosed pipeline candidates”. How quickly we forget and forgive the tactics we’ve fallen for before. I’ll believe it when I see it. Cafe you are so cynical. Clearly you’re blind to the fact that the very best pipeline candidates are NOT on the website. Veins of gold that are hidden but all shall be revealed when the time is right!
|
|
|
Post by LongMNKD on Sept 16, 2020 9:15:39 GMT -5
Cafe you are so cynical. Clearly you’re blind to the fact that the very best pipeline candidates are NOT on the website. Veins of gold that are hidden but all shall be revealed when the time is right! LOL! Veins of gold right? Is that like an embarrassment of riches? I hope the undisclosed pipeline candidates are good.. but don't get your hopes up, especially for anything anytime soon. I wouldn't expect UTHR to push anything else until TreT is proven successful.
|
|
|
Post by casualinvestor on Sept 16, 2020 9:33:29 GMT -5
Is MNKD able to do the phase 1 for Sumatriptan Technosphere® on it's own? I think this is the most likely non-UTHR molecule to get traction
|
|
|
Post by matt on Sept 16, 2020 10:56:00 GMT -5
Is MNKD able to do the phase 1 for Sumatriptan Technosphere® on it's own? I think this is the most likely non-UTHR molecule to get traction Phase I trials are generally limited to safety with no indication of efficacy at all. Phase II trials are generally dose escalation protocols, which find the range(s) of dosages needed to create a therapeutic effect and sometimes provides limited efficacy data depending on how large the cohorts are. Phase III is the largest where patients with the disease condition are treated for signs of efficacy and to reveal side effects not detectable in the Phase I population. Phase I trials, especially with approved drugs, are often tiny or are skipped entirely. Can MNKD afford a limited scope Phase I trial, which would only require 15-20 healthy subjects? Almost certainly. Would such a trial get anybody excited? Unlikely, because that trial would be performed with a proven drug and a proven delivery system. Indeed, it would be only be remarkable if Phase I failed miserably precisely because the risks involved are so minimal. A more likely scenario would be to do a combined Phase I/II trial on a larger cohort, say 100 patients, which could provide insight into dosing requirements and some indication of efficacy. That trial, while making a lot more economic sense, would be a fairly expensive exercise that would likely be too rich for MNKD to undertake without a partner. What MNKD can afford to do on their own would provide such a limited amount of data that doing such a trial is not a good use of the money. Conversely, if a trial has enough patients and collects enough data to provide meaningful results then it is probably more expensive than what MNKD itself can afford. Rock meet hard place.
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Sept 16, 2020 14:39:29 GMT -5
“✅ Not all pipeline candidates are on the website” The “too long” long group must be getting hungry again, and too long on the tooth to remember the MNKD playbook. Doesn’t this sound eerily like RLS? Or Torrey Pines and the pain program? mnkd.proboards.com/thread/4017/pain-management-plansI used to prod MNKD for their prolific use of the carrot and stick approach to keeping hungry investors eager for a breakthrough announcement and none ever came. It seems we got a short reprieve from this earlier this year, and now it starts anew with “undisclosed pipeline candidates”. How quickly we forget and forgive the tactics we’ve fallen for before. I’ll believe it when I see it. Cafe you are so cynical. Clearly you’re blind to the fact that the very best pipeline candidates are NOT on the website. Veins of gold that are hidden but all shall be revealed when the time is right! Cynical, yes. Blind? Hell no! Been here forever and seen it all. "The very best pipeline candidates are NOT on the website"? Really? Says who? That really doesn't make much sense to me.
|
|