|
|
Post by mango on Jul 6, 2021 16:12:50 GMT -5
Dr. Pierre Kory, an ICU intensivist, and a team of physicians have all been treating their COVID patients using ivermectin with excellent success. They’ve even been treating post-COVID vaccine patients who are hospitalized due to adverse events of the vaccine using ivermectin. |
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Jul 6, 2021 21:16:30 GMT -5
I’m all about green, but it is very important to pay attention to what is causing the green-house gases, and I don’t mean cows. Electric vehicles? Where’s the juice coming from? Mostly oil, natural gas, and coal burning electric plants of course. Is there a net positive gain going “green” with electric vehicles? How could there be? Much of the electricity that is generated is lost in transmission. I read once where the CEO of Toyota said the reason they weren’t pushing electric was because the US grid was completely incapable of sustaining a mass market. Anyway, way off topic, so BD or Liane, feel free to delete this post.. As someone who has gone down the rabbit hole researching efficiencies (fuel cell, BEV, etc), you are just regurgitating FUD or the next line of defense, sloth (ie, "the grid can't support it, so we should ever try"). There are some states that have plenty of hydro/nuclear/solar/wind/etc. For example, NY has some very very low carbon electricity due to Niagara Falls and 3 nuclear power plants. Transmission losses, BEV charging losses are certainly there. But must be weighed against fuel transport and gasoline refining. Not FUD my friend, just pointing out things to take into consideration. If NY can sustain it, awesome, CA certainly can’t and they are the state with the militantly aggressive stance on it, politically speaking of course, not from a reality or technical perspective, not that the state government would let facts stand in their way. Oroville Dam, largest dam in California, the one that caused the massive evacuation, just turned off their hydro plant, insufficient water. Solar doesn’t work at night. Windmills kill birds. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. I AM all about green, and my relatives could tell you my speeches on the subject, but I have done a lot of research on the subject (for debate tournaments) so I’m willing to go deep on the subject but it has nothing to do with Afrezza and CGMs, so I need to not write another word on energy policy. |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jul 6, 2021 21:36:43 GMT -5
As someone who has gone down the rabbit hole researching efficiencies (fuel cell, BEV, etc), you are just regurgitating FUD or the next line of defense, sloth (ie, "the grid can't support it, so we should ever try"). There are some states that have plenty of hydro/nuclear/solar/wind/etc. For example, NY has some very very low carbon electricity due to Niagara Falls and 3 nuclear power plants. Transmission losses, BEV charging losses are certainly there. But must be weighed against fuel transport and gasoline refining. Not FUD my friend, just pointing out things to take into consideration. If NY can sustain it, awesome, CA certainly can’t and they are the state with the militantly aggressive stance on it, politically speaking of course, not from a reality or technical perspective, not that the state government would let facts stand in their way. Oroville Dam, largest dam in California, the one that caused the massive evacuation, just turned off their hydro plant, insufficient water. Solar doesn’t work at night. Windmills kill birds. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. I AM all about green, and my relatives could tell you my speeches on the subject, but I have done a lot of research on the subject (for debate tournaments) so I’m willing to go deep on the subject but it has nothing to do with Afrezza and CGMs, so I need to not write another word on energy policy. |
|
|
|
Post by liane on Jul 7, 2021 3:41:00 GMT -5
This thread has strayed far and wide. Time to lock it.
|
|
