|
Post by agedhippie on May 30, 2023 22:58:31 GMT -5
What is it about mnkd that does not get fair value while lqda seems to be over valued? This injustice has been going on for over a decade. Is our management team so bad since Al passed that wall street fails to analyze the potential value? Management team is always something that Wall Street takes into account. ...Plus LQDA only has 64.5M shares outstanding whereas MNKD has 264M shares outstanding. Share count matters because the profits are spread thinner - it's why share buybacks are popular with investors.
|
|
|
Post by hellodolly on May 31, 2023 5:43:04 GMT -5
What is it about mnkd that does not get fair value while lqda seems to be over valued? This injustice has been going on for over a decade. Is our management team so bad since Al passed that wall street fails to analyze the potential value? Wall Street (large institutional entities) will certainly lose interest in companies that are fraught with competency and trust issues. - Trust so as to not mismanage the ship in such a way that large institutional money feels like they're taking consistent loses on every new percentage of share accumulation each quarter.
- Competency to lead, remain focused, grow and manage, all centered around their publicly stated goals. The plan is out in front for everyone to see at every healthcare conference.
Fortunately, we don't have those issues here or MNKD would be sub-one dollar share price. The reason why MNKD is not below $1 is largely due in part to the emerging growth story that is shaping up which ties directly into management's competency. So long as the story remains intact, so will the trust and the subsequent accumulation and increase of ownership by the large institutions. That, and the share price rise since Mike took over, is where you look to see if Wall Street is punishing a stock. As I recall, the two prior CEO's at the helm before Mike took over where dealt some pretty tough blows, largely in part due to Sanofi. But, that's water under the bridge and nothing or nobody could change that. Mike has since breathed new life into MNKD and it's now a matter of continuing to execute on the plans they've laid out to investors. It's really all business.
|
|
|
Post by akemp3000 on May 31, 2023 6:33:40 GMT -5
Spot on hellodolly. Well said. Not sure how this could be any clearer but there will always be those few that will be negative...or nefarious
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on May 31, 2023 8:17:39 GMT -5
What is it about mnkd that does not get fair value while lqda seems to be over valued? This injustice has been going on for over a decade. Is our management team so bad since Al passed that wall street fails to analyze the potential value? Management team is always something that Wall Street takes into account. That probably helps explain why the MNKD share price increased by about 25% in the last month (in a tough market). But I get what you're saying. You're bashing the management, again. Let me help you. What specifically is the MannKind management doing that you believe is causing the share price to be held back?
|
|
|
Post by uvula on May 31, 2023 8:31:18 GMT -5
Off to a good start. Not sure why.
|
|
|
Post by boytroy88 on May 31, 2023 8:36:23 GMT -5
And back down...smh... Hope something gives it another push up and make it stay there.
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on May 31, 2023 9:22:40 GMT -5
Management team is always something that Wall Street takes into account. That probably helps explain why the MNKD share price increased by about 25% in the last month (in a tough market). But I get what you're saying. You're bashing the management, again. Let me help you. What specifically is the MannKind management doing that you believe is causing the share price to be held back? Interesting (and telling) take on a factual and incontrovertible statement.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on May 31, 2023 11:48:24 GMT -5
MNKD volume at the half day of trade, 961,361 Avg. Volume 3,263,022
$4.59. +0.16 (+3.6117%)
|
|
|
Post by hellodolly on May 31, 2023 14:09:32 GMT -5
MNKD volume at the half day of trade, 961,361 Avg. Volume 3,263,022 $4.59. +0.16 (+3.6117%) Now, back to our regularly scheduled broadcast. Thank you peppy
|
|
|
Post by wyattdog on May 31, 2023 15:06:31 GMT -5
1,990,655 million share block trade at the close
|
|
|
Post by peppy on May 31, 2023 15:16:45 GMT -5
MNKD volume at the half day of trade, 961,361 Avg. Volume 3,263,022 $4.59. +0.16 (+3.6117%) MNKD Nasdaq real time volume, 4,635,723 shares. Volume was 2,014,262 20 minutes prior to the close. 2,435,774 shares 5 mins prior to the close. $4.64. +0.21 (+4.74%) The month has ended. MNKD monthly, up 78 cents which is 20%. ..... schrts.co/hweZEWCEThe 100 month $4.81. Point of triangle break out looks like $6.01. The on balance volume is up. The MACD is green by .001 ..... UTHR monthly schrts.co/XrCuMNsAIBB monthly, not as pretty. schrts.co/kVmIkYcR
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Jun 1, 2023 8:56:03 GMT -5
The market appears to disapprove of the House of Representatives approval of the debt deal. Interesting.
MNKD down .12 (so far) on light volume of 213K shares at 9:55ET
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jun 1, 2023 9:31:44 GMT -5
The market appears to disapprove of the House of Representatives approval of the debt deal. Interesting. MNKD down .12 (so far) on light volume of 213K shares at 9:55ET The market was barely down at all and is now flat to green.
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Jun 1, 2023 10:35:14 GMT -5
The market appears to disapprove of the House of Representatives approval of the debt deal. Interesting. MNKD down .12 (so far) on light volume of 213K shares at 9:55ET The market was barely down at all and is now flat to green. I don't know what the definition of "barely down" is, but at the time of my post the Dow was down around 200 points, NASDAQ was down, and so was the S&P500.
|
|
|
Post by LongMNKD on Jun 1, 2023 11:57:55 GMT -5
The market was barely down at all and is now flat to green. I don't know what the definition of "barely down" is, but at the time of my post the Dow was down around 200 points, NASDAQ was down, and so was the S&P500. It's a little more then "slightly down" but not quite just "down"
|
|