|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Dec 19, 2023 16:45:28 GMT -5
Anderson's explanation based on 10K and 10B5-1 Plan was also very helpful and preferable because it is based in evidence of real-world regulated stock sales transactions instead of speculative hyperbole of a criminal nature.
"speculative hyperbole of a criminal nature"? What a phrase, I've never seen it be a criminal act to engage in speculative hyperbole, but I suppose it's theoretically possible. Or if you're suggesting our ceo's stock sale was somehow criminal in nature, I wouldn't do that without some evidence of it. To that point, awesomo began the discussion without suggesting any such criminality, as he clearly said "coincidentally" referring to the trades. My posts on the topic have likewise included no suggestions of criminality. Just setting the record straight in case you're trying to imply otherwise (though your post is clumsily worded and therefore unclear). I'll own "clumsily worded", but both you and awesomo both went to some effort to imply the CEO could plausibly have indulged in a stock sale of a "criminal nature".
Awesomo clearly did it with the quotes around the word "coincidentally" and you went on and on (and on) about how odd the trades looked also clearly casting aspersions (aka FUD). You've gotten way more mileage out of this news than I would have expected but part of that has to be my fault for trying to get you to admit it was all BS.
|
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Dec 19, 2023 16:50:37 GMT -5
"speculative hyperbole of a criminal nature"? What a phrase, I've never seen it be a criminal act to engage in speculative hyperbole, but I suppose it's theoretically possible. Or if you're suggesting our ceo's stock sale was somehow criminal in nature, I wouldn't do that without some evidence of it. To that point, awesomo began the discussion without suggesting any such criminality, as he clearly said "coincidentally" referring to the trades. My posts on the topic have likewise included no suggestions of criminality. Just setting the record straight in case you're trying to imply otherwise (though your post is clumsily worded and therefore unclear). I'll own "clumsily worded", but both you and awesomo both went to some effort to imply the CEO could plausibly have indulged in a stock sale of a "criminal nature".
Awesomo clearly did it with the quotes around the word "coincidentally" and you went on and on (and on) about how odd the trades looked also clearly casting aspersions (aka FUD). You've gotten way more mileage out of this news than I would have expected but part of that has to be my fault for trying to get you to admit it was all BS.
LOL, there's no quotes around that word in what I posted. You just see what you want to see. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 19, 2023 16:51:33 GMT -5
I have reason to believe that the 66k transfer had to do with his previous divorce. Not to come off creepy, and I don’t know our CEO personally, but years of bad online dating has made me rather adept at internet sleuthing…. And bc of that, I know that he just celebrated his anniversary on what looked like a nice trip. Maybe that is why he sold shares… vacation inflation! Not like this is anyone’s business, but for those who think this has to do with a current divorce preceding, I wanted to mention it. And sorry this is on wrong thread but I saw a few posts related to this topic. Long (sadly too long) MNKD since 2011. Best wishes for a better 2024 Thank you, this is why people should not speculate ..what a mess! This has not been fair to him at all because of all the posts on StockTwits. I don’t know how he takes it. If this is not a current divorce, apologies to Mike C for the whole thread. |
|
|
|
Post by BD on Dec 19, 2023 16:54:28 GMT -5
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the sparring, but it seems to me there is a descent into minutiae and butting of heads over judgment calls that makes me worry. Around here, we've become a pretty close-knit group, and once opinions have been established, I'd like to throw out there the idea that everyone gets it.
Maybe let's veer a bit more toward simple facts and less our personal agendas? Because we all have them, and they're not all bad, just best kept in proportion.
|
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Dec 19, 2023 17:00:44 GMT -5
Thanks BD, and gorman please double check people’s posts before you make false accusations like you did just now with awesomo. I mean that sincerely and in the spirit of fair debating. I know you’re an intelligent person. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Dec 19, 2023 17:28:17 GMT -5
Thanks BD, and gorman please double check people’s posts before you make false accusations like you did just now with awesomo. I mean that sincerely and in the spirit of fair debating. I know you’re an intelligent person. Cheers! Yup. No quotes (except in my mind's eye), but I'll add some here with the citation.
"So the PPS gets propped up to $4 coincidentally when Mike unloads shares, now it drops back down." - awesomo
The words and phrases "propped up", "coincidentally", and "unloads" very clearly imply something was amiss. That's also called "casting aspersions". Merriam-Webster defines "cast aspersions" as "to criticize (someone or someone's actions or character) harshly or unfairly".
Some might say it was also defamatory and libelous.
I'm not going back through your posts to quote your remarks as you piled on post after post, but to me it definitely appeared to be the same kind of aspersion casting. Quite the show, but not very entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Dec 19, 2023 17:35:18 GMT -5
Thanks BD, and gorman please double check people’s posts before you make false accusations like you did just now with awesomo. I mean that sincerely and in the spirit of fair debating. I know you’re an intelligent person. Cheers! Yup. No quotes (except in my mind's eye), but I'll add some here with the citation.
"So the PPS gets propped up to $4 coincidentally when Mike unloads shares, now it drops back down." - awesomo
The words and phrases "propped up", "coincidentally", and "unloads" very clearly imply something was amiss. That's also called "casting aspersions". Merriam-Webster defines "cast aspersions" as "to criticize (someone or someone's actions or character) harshly or unfairly".
Some might say it was also defamatory and libelous.
I'm not going back through your posts to quote your remarks as you piled on post after post, but to me it definitely appeared to be the same kind of aspersion casting. Quite the show, but not very entertaining.
Please find something more constructive to spend your time doing...seriously. |
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Dec 19, 2023 17:52:12 GMT -5
Yup. No quotes (except in my mind's eye), but I'll add some here with the citation.
"So the PPS gets propped up to $4 coincidentally when Mike unloads shares, now it drops back down." - awesomo
The words and phrases "propped up", "coincidentally", and "unloads" very clearly imply something was amiss. That's also called "casting aspersions". Merriam-Webster defines "cast aspersions" as "to criticize (someone or someone's actions or character) harshly or unfairly".
Some might say it was also defamatory and libelous.
I'm not going back through your posts to quote your remarks as you piled on post after post, but to me it definitely appeared to be the same kind of aspersion casting. Quite the show, but not very entertaining.
Please find something more constructive to spend your time doing...seriously. Back at ya. |
|
|
|
Post by porkini on Dec 19, 2023 18:17:52 GMT -5
MNKD Nasdaq real time volume, Volume: 2,043,190..................was 1,659,452 shares on close. $3.91. +4.83%. +0.18..... closed high of the day, support and resistance in this price chop. inside day. chop chop until t is not. MNKD daily chart. schrts.co/WsaUywHxEnough of the chagrin. Volume. |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Dec 19, 2023 19:04:50 GMT -5
Please find something more constructive to spend your time doing...seriously. Back at ya. I'm not the one imagining "quotes" to show your own bias and then analyzing every single last word of a random post to prove that you are somehow correct in your mind. |
|
|
|
Post by BD on Dec 19, 2023 19:06:16 GMT -5
Wow, my post sure helped didn't it?
Look, once and for all, the statement by awesomeo:
"So the PPS gets propped up to $4 coincidentally when Mike unloads shares, now it drops back down."
is NOT libelous, defamatory, or even the slightest bit against our rules.
STOP IT!
The staff reserves the right to lock this thread if you guys keep it up.
|
|
