|
Post by cjm18 on Oct 29, 2024 21:27:24 GMT -5
83% short today. Most volume was at $7 in the morning. Bond holders shorting? How does a stock go up w 83% shorting? Perhaps a pre-determined trade and shorted when it was above 7. So stock is currently below the short price.
|
|
|
Post by BD on Oct 29, 2024 21:56:57 GMT -5
Seems like a meaningless number to me, only because: who has data on every trade and whether the selling party is borrowing those shares first or not? Is this publicly available somewhere I was not aware of?
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Oct 30, 2024 0:16:33 GMT -5
FINRA provides a report, but not sure if you have to pay for it. My memory is the free information is limited and potentially stale, but I haven't looked at it in quite a while so would like to see your question answered by someone who knows.
|
|
|
Post by cjm18 on Oct 30, 2024 5:00:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BD on Oct 30, 2024 8:25:23 GMT -5
Here's what Google AI says in response to "is finra short sale volume data accurate"
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Oct 30, 2024 8:52:46 GMT -5
Inaccurate and stale and incentive to keep it that way. Transparency is not welcome.
|
|
|
Post by ktim on Oct 30, 2024 11:41:56 GMT -5
83% short today. Most volume was at $7 in the morning. Bond holders shorting? How does a stock go up w 83% shorting? Because that number is almost meaningless. If a money market firm buys from you and immediately sells the share to someone else earning the spread as profit, that is not a short sale. If the market maker sells you a "market price" share they don't have and immediately turns around and buys one from someone else earning the spread as profit, that records a short sale. Yet there is no practical difference that has occurred. A share has been moved from one retail investor to another... and no increase in open short interest.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Oct 30, 2024 11:49:15 GMT -5
83% short today. Most volume was at $7 in the morning. Bond holders shorting? They are going to get their asses handed to them. It is only Wednesday.
|
|
|
Post by ktim on Oct 30, 2024 13:43:29 GMT -5
How does a stock go up w 83% shorting? Because that number is almost meaningless. If a money market firm buys from you and immediately sells the share to someone else earning the spread as profit, that is not a short sale. If the market maker sells you a "market price" share they don't have and immediately turns around and buys one from someone else earning the spread as profit, that records a short sale. Yet there is no practical difference that has occurred. A share has been moved from one retail investor to another... and no increase in open short interest. I think I had a senior moment... that's market making firm not money market firm.
|
|
|
Post by BD on Oct 30, 2024 14:50:00 GMT -5
So we all had similar senior moments and read it as "market making" lol
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Oct 30, 2024 17:46:30 GMT -5
So we all had similar senior moments and read it as "market making" lol I totally did. And as always ktim, thanks for the accurate post especially if it helps dispel any myths.
|
|
|
Post by letitride on Oct 30, 2024 17:58:43 GMT -5
Schwab has Mannkind with an ETB (Easy to borrow) designation guess they want them to go all in.
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Oct 31, 2024 12:03:47 GMT -5
Schwab has Mannkind with an ETB (Easy to borrow) designation guess they want them to go all in. That sort of designation, or a low cost to borrow, tells you that the short position is small. If there really was an 83% short position shares would definitely not be easy to borrow!
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Oct 31, 2024 12:19:00 GMT -5
Schwab has Mannkind with an ETB (Easy to borrow) designation guess they want them to go all in. That sort of designation, or a low cost to borrow, tells you that the short position is small. If there really was an 83% short position shares would definitely not be easy to borrow! 240 million shares/ 100 % = 40 million short shares/ x 16.666666%
|
|
|
Post by BD on Oct 31, 2024 12:51:34 GMT -5
Schwab has Mannkind with an ETB (Easy to borrow) designation guess they want them to go all in. That sort of designation, or a low cost to borrow, tells you that the short position is small. If there really was an 83% short position shares would definitely not be easy to borrow! I think the 83% was supposed to be referring to the ratio of "buys" vs. "sells" or something within some time period (a day?), I don't think there's any point in taking it too seriously.
|
|