Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2016 8:59:48 GMT -5
What you are saying is not theory. It's how it should be read . Say hey is as bad as Kevin if not worse. If rls had 2.5 bil invested in cannibas I would be damned. If you read only drops is ready now. Mnkd market cap is less than 300 mil lol Quote: 2.5 bil invested. Mnkd market cap is less than 300 mil lol Reply: I do not see humor.
I know peppy . I dont see the humor too. but better to keep spirits lightened than panic. as nothing else for me to do except watch as at this levels as I am cornered with my investment
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2016 9:02:00 GMT -5
Most here are assuming the page from RLS leaked recently with the pot inhaled is true.. Is that most of you posters theory? I am very interested to hear from a web site knowlegable person to either debunk the recent page or say it is more then likely the real thing.. If it is real I have many questions of its nature. I read the page many times over and it looks like the real thing but i have to ask why they would have this page in the first place? Why would it be marked Confidential if its for promotion or likely to get funding if they are fully Pattened. Its not theory. receptor home page had a passcode menu item that which I think led to this document. now both have been taken down. most of the documents will be marked confidential as its for limited audience.
|
|
|
Post by kbrion77 on Oct 13, 2016 9:09:55 GMT -5
41 pages of nonsense about RLS and will probably get to 75 by the end of the year. The below was posted on the 2nd page of this thread back in January and absolutely nothing has changed since then. The "leaked" document about RLS confirms everything that Mannkind stated in the January FAQ but as with always with this stock people try to connect dots that are fantasies.
Highlights
the first material milestone is expected to be received this year, if all goes according to plan
We can confirm that the company is funded by an important investor group, supported by prominent business leaders in the Seattle area. Alfred Mann is not an investor or in any way affiliated with Receptor. MannKind did significant diligence in regards to Receptor and its financial backers, and came away quite impressed
Is the agreement exclusive in any way?
The agreement is exclusive only to the compounds used by the licensee, which are proprietary to them in any case. It does not prevent us from entering into other licensing agreements with other companies, even in the same therapeutic area, so long as they use different active compounds.
|
|
|
Post by cathode on Oct 13, 2016 9:23:19 GMT -5
Here is the metadata on the pdf file that I could pull easily.
Author: Traci Carman Creator: Microsoft® Word 2013 Producer: Microsoft® Word 2013 CreationDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT ModDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page rot: 0 File size: 549257 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.5
|
|
|
Post by madog365 on Oct 13, 2016 9:43:34 GMT -5
Here is the metadata on the pdf file that I could pull easily. Author: Traci Carman Creator: Microsoft® Word 2013 Producer: Microsoft® Word 2013 CreationDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT ModDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page rot: 0 File size: 549257 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.5 Wow this is an absolute bombshell. I cannot believe that anybody still uses the 2013 version of Microsoft Word. I think based on this, it is time to sell.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2016 9:45:18 GMT -5
Here is the metadata on the pdf file that I could pull easily. Author: Traci Carman Creator: Microsoft® Word 2013 Producer: Microsoft® Word 2013 CreationDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT ModDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page rot: 0 File size: 549257 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.5 Wow this is an absolute bombshell. I cannot believe that anybody still uses the 2013 version of Microsoft Word. I think based on this, it is time to sell. My company still uses word 2010. what does your company use?
|
|
|
Post by lakon on Oct 13, 2016 9:47:20 GMT -5
Note to RLS: 1. If you do not intend to release a document, don't put it online. 2. See #1. 3. If you must put it online for convenience, use multiple layers of password protection and encryption. (Caveat: You are the US Secretary of the State. Then, just send e-mail all you want. Who gives a rat's ass when it's so convenient.) 4. ***If you get caught, quietly delete all of the files, but don't change anything else. For God's sake, don't say a word.*** 5. Lather, rinse, repeat. There's clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, here I am, Stuck in the middle with you [MNKD]. Oh, BTW, if you can do CBD, you can do THC. If you can do THC, you can do Nicotine. Don't rest on your laurels. Pick a fight with the Cartel and Big Tobacco. I mean the FDA was child's play, right? I'm looking for a fight. Just give me a call. Can you put lead on Technosphere, too? We might need it.
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Oct 13, 2016 11:25:25 GMT -5
So currently only the drops appear to be ready for "immediate commercialization and licensing". Thus I wonder if they have been approved by the FDA for medical use or if they somehow have a value for recreational use? They mention available for licensing which leads me to believe they might not be planning on marketing these on their own; perhaps not enough capital to do so?
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Oct 13, 2016 11:28:03 GMT -5
I noticed that Peppy's post disappeared. Liane, if you don't want this posted, feel free to delete. I assume it was deleted for violation of forum rules (as spottily applied as they sometimes are). mnkd.proboards.com/thread/11/"6.1.1. Any article and/or photo that is protected by copyright against re-publishing without a publisher or author providing written permission is not allowed to be re-printed / re-posted on ProBoards for legal reasons and may be deleted immediately." The document in question has a copyright mark on it, not to mention the 'confidential and proprietary' marking. So it seems clear the publisher does not want it re-printed / re-posted. Pretty sure Liane posted a special announcement about this a couple of weeks ago, though I can't find / see the announcement now.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Oct 13, 2016 11:35:44 GMT -5
DISCLOSURE - I deleted the above-mentioned post and sent peppy a message explaining why it was removed. As you correctly state, liane stated a few days ago why we are removing the proprietary document. Please keep in mind that the Administrators/Moderators must comply with the rules of the company that hosts this forum. Frankly, it's not worth the risk of having our entire ProBoard-MNKD forum shut down.
Thank you for your understanding.
P.S. If we miss a few, that does NOT mean that we condone the posting of proprietary information.
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Oct 13, 2016 11:37:44 GMT -5
This is just more speculation of course, but I can't help to think that RLS might be planning on an IPO to raise funds and that those "1500 patents and $2.5 billion invested " into this inhalable discrete and precise dosage device will play a huge role in raising funds for RLS to become whole. I also wonder if perhaps MNKD''s milestone payment(s) might not be at least somewhat dependent upon how much the stock offering would raise. I have a different theory on the "1500 patents and $2.5B invested"...namely, that those numbers are the amount that MannKind has invested in the development of Technosphere / Afrezza, and RLS is using the numbers for credibility. I don't see how a company as seemingly new as RLS could invest that much money and obtain that many patents in secrecy. I could be wrong if they have a longer history than what it seems. When RLS started up, there were many theories flying about. One I recall is that RLS was going to do a reverse merger with MNKD (see link below). The second was that RLS was created to take over MNKD's patents in advance of MNKD's bankruptcy (or something like that, I forget how this was supposed to work). Anyway, my sardonic point is that maybe RLS just got ahead of itself with that patents line. To wit, it plans to own the patents soon enough. mnkd.proboards.com/thread/5030/reverse-merger
|
|
|
Post by audiomr on Oct 13, 2016 18:05:15 GMT -5
Here is the metadata on the pdf file that I could pull easily. Author: Traci Carman Creator: Microsoft® Word 2013 Producer: Microsoft® Word 2013 CreationDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT ModDate: Fri Oct 7 16:49:02 2016 EDT Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page rot: 0 File size: 549257 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.5 Wow this is an absolute bombshell. I cannot believe that anybody still uses the 2013 version of Microsoft Word. I think based on this, it is time to sell. It's been a long time since there was a compelling reason to move to a new version of Word. (Which is kind of an awful word processor to begin with, but I digress.)
|
|
|
Post by compound26 on Oct 13, 2016 18:16:05 GMT -5
Wow this is an absolute bombshell. I cannot believe that anybody still uses the 2013 version of Microsoft Word. I think based on this, it is time to sell. It's been a long time since there was a compelling reason to move to a new version of Word. (Which is kind of an awful word processor to begin with, but I digress.) I am an attorney in a major us law firm and we are still using Word 2010.
|
|
|
Post by liane on Oct 13, 2016 18:19:12 GMT -5
Chalk me up as another Word 2010 user.
|
|
|
Post by sayhey24 on Oct 13, 2016 18:20:41 GMT -5
I have a different theory on the "1500 patents and $2.5B invested"...namely, that those numbers are the amount that MannKind has invested in the development of Technosphere / Afrezza, and RLS is using the numbers for credibility. I don't see how a company as seemingly new as RLS could invest that much money and obtain that many patents in secrecy. I could be wrong if they have a longer history than what it seems. What you are saying is not theory. It's how it should be read . Say hey is as bad as Kevin if not worse. If rls had 2.5 bil invested in cannibas I would be damned. If you read only drops is ready now. Mnkd market cap is less than 300 mil lol What we know is MNKD does not have $2.5B invested. I am not sure where they are getting that number but I suspect its mostly MNKD's about $2B and the rest is RLS development. If they have drops already available for commercial distribution they clearly have been working on this awhile most likely way before Andrea got involved. I bet if you took some of the old-line MSFT money you could scrape together at least a billion pretty easily.
|
|