|
Post by lakers on Nov 10, 2016 3:23:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 10, 2016 4:51:20 GMT -5
Maine is still too close to call as of 5AM Thursday 11/10/16.
|
|
|
Post by cgiscgis on Nov 10, 2016 10:01:50 GMT -5
We will hear more end of November as to milestone payments
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 10, 2016 11:45:14 GMT -5
Maine is still too close to call as of 5AM Thursday 11/10/16. Maine Question 1 — Legalize Marijuana — Results: “Yes” in the Lead By The New York Times Nov. 10, 2016, 11:40 AM ET
Answer | Votes | Pct.
Yes | 377,920 | 50.2% No | 375,172 | 49.8%
99% reporting (583 of 589 precincts)
The “Yes” vote leads by less than 1 point with 99 percent of precincts reporting.
Source: www.nytimes.com/elections/results/maine-ballot-measure-1-legalize-marijuana
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Nov 10, 2016 14:00:06 GMT -5
For those of you who think that RLS will capture the market for recreational users. Recreational users like the THC; but for people who are using for medical purposes they want the chemical BPD. Marijuana renders THC in the beginning of flowers maturity. As the plant's flowers gets ripe and ready to harvest the tricomes (crystals covering the flower) change with time from THC to BPD. Therefore, recreational users are not the same audience as medical users. RLS in their application to get past the FDA would provide higher concentrations in BPDs. In understanding there are two markets for marijuana is just a clarification. The demand for medicine, I think, wil be strong. There are many people (the vast majority) who wouldn't do well with the psycotropic affects of THC. There are many patients with real medical problems who benefit from the use of medicinal marijuana... which is still by large; restricted, for now. If you want to know more... this is directly from a grower. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS53quemzOw
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 14:09:44 GMT -5
For those of you who think that RLS will capture the market for recreational users. Recreational users like the THC; but for people who are using for medical purposes they want the chemical BPD. Marijuana renders THC in the beginning of flowers maturity. As the plant's flowers gets ripe and ready to harvest the tricomes (crystals covering the flower) change with time from THC to BPD. Therefore, recreational users are not the same audience as medical users. RLS in their application to get past the FDA would provide higher concentrations in BPDs. If you want to know more... this is directly from a grower. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS53quemzOwwho's to say, RLS cant load the THC too on technosphere and mark it for recreational use.. so no fda involved and u get high with so smoke/smell...
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 10, 2016 14:25:11 GMT -5
For those of you who think that RLS will capture the market for recreational users. Recreational users like the THC; but for people who are using for medical purposes they want the chemical BPD. Marijuana renders THC in the beginning of flowers maturity. As the plant's flowers gets ripe and ready to harvest the tricomes (crystals covering the flower) change with time from THC to BPD. Therefore, recreational users are not the same audience as medical users. RLS in their application to get past the FDA would provide higher concentrations in BPDs. If you want to know more... this is directly from a grower. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS53quemzOwwho's to say, RLS cant load the THC too on technosphere and mark it for recreational use.. so no fda involved and u get high with so smoke/smell... There is probably a large market for non-FDA approved medicinal use, where consistency of dosing and fast action may be drivers. True recreational users I doubt are going to want to pass around a dreamboat, popping in cartridges. There simply are too many other options for recreational, and believe it or not many people like the act of smoking... hence why cigarettes haven't been totally replaced by nicotine gum. Further, many recreational users treat their weed like wine or beer... they like finding new varieties and comparing the quality of the product and the high they get. With regard to recreational, technosphere pot would be a solution searching for a problem. IMHO
|
|
|
Post by mango on Nov 10, 2016 14:31:20 GMT -5
For those of you who think that RLS will capture the market for recreational users. Recreational users like the THC; but for people who are using for medical purposes they want the chemical BPD. Marijuana renders THC in the beginning of flowers maturity. As the plant's flowers gets ripe and ready to harvest the tricomes (crystals covering the flower) change with time from THC to BPD. Therefore, recreational users are not the same audience as medical users. RLS in their application to get past the FDA would provide higher concentrations in BPDs. If you want to know more... this is directly from a grower. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS53quemzOwwho's to say, RLS cant load the THC too on technosphere and mark it for recreational use.. so no fda involved and u get high with so smoke/smell... MannKind will not be associated with recreational use. Alfred Mann's mission was to fill the gap in unmet needs. Recreational cannabis use is not an unmet need, and not something Alfred Mann would ever support. Alfred Mann would, however, support what Israel is doing and that is laying the foundation to fill the unmet need of medical cannabis, medical cannabis derived medicines, and also compounds that will help achieve homeostasis of the endocannabinoid system. As of right now, Phytecs is the authority on this subject. Phytecs is the only company that Alfred Mann would support and invest in. Dr. Raphael Mechoulam is world renowned, and Israel is lead by his guidance on this matter as the Israeli government highly respects and honors him. Getting high is not an unmet need. Recognizing what the ECS does, and is responsible for and creating therapies that work on this system is the unmet need. The ECS regulates every physiological process.
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Nov 10, 2016 14:33:24 GMT -5
For those of you who think that RLS will capture the market for recreational users. Recreational users like the THC; but for people who are using for medical purposes they want the chemical BPD. Marijuana renders THC in the beginning of flowers maturity. As the plant's flowers gets ripe and ready to harvest the tricomes (crystals covering the flower) change with time from THC to BPD. Therefore, recreational users are not the same audience as medical users. RLS in their application to get past the FDA would provide higher concentrations in BPDs. If you want to know more... this is directly from a grower. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS53quemzOwwho's to say, RLS cant load the THC too on technosphere and mark it for recreational use.. so no fda involved and u get high with so smoke/smell... There is no reason why RLS couldn't "load" THC instead of BPD. But, that market is saturated with edibles, vape pens, and some prefer just to smoke it. Vape pens are the least expensive way to go... You buy the oil and reload he pen and it's easy to use without a stigma.. All I'm say is that there are two different markets. My guess is that the FDA would be more inclined to approve for Medicinal application first and would be RLS's focus.
|
|
|
Post by mannmade on Nov 10, 2016 15:12:23 GMT -5
Also likely with Dreamboat and cartridges you can "distill" and dispense different %'s of THC so depending on its use and the tolerance of the user/patient.
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Nov 10, 2016 15:29:28 GMT -5
pot gets tested for THC and BPD in california when sold at dispensaries. the staff are informed as to which hybrids they are selling and what the content of THC and BPD is in each offering. Edible meds are the same... tested and weighted for a specific amount of chemical. These are not random tests in california, they are clinical tests by companies who only test. dispensaries have to know what percentage of each before it can be sold. When colorado adopted recreational use; edible meds available in california cut the product content in 1/2 for the sales in colorado and nationally. 1/2 the content for the same cost.
I think it would be easier to hybridize for higher (pun intended) BPD than to try to distill it later. It's an art to grow marijuana despite the perception from people who don't partake.
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 10, 2016 17:05:50 GMT -5
Maine is now officially "Yes" to legal MJ.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 18:58:31 GMT -5
who's to say, RLS cant load the THC too on technosphere and mark it for recreational use.. so no fda involved and u get high with so smoke/smell... MannKind will not be associated with recreational use. Alfred Mann's mission was to fill the gap in unmet needs. Recreational cannabis use is not an unmet need, and not something Alfred Mann would ever support. Alfred Mann would, however, support what Israel is doing and that is laying the foundation to fill the unmet need of medical cannabis, medical cannabis derived medicines, and also compounds that will help achieve homeostasis of the endocannabinoid system. As of right now, Phytecs is the authority on this subject. Phytecs is the only company that Alfred Mann would support and invest in. Dr. Raphael Mechoulam is world renowned, and Israel is lead by his guidance on this matter as the Israeli government highly respects and honors him. Getting high is not an unmet need. Recognizing what the ECS does, and is responsible for and creating therapies that work on this system is the unmet need. The ECS regulates every physiological process. While I dont disagree. Cash at this point, will take what we can get. And if that means extra $$. So be it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2016 19:09:37 GMT -5
Mannkind licensed the technology so it's up to RLS to do what they want. I don't believe the licensing came with dictating what they can and can't do
|
|
|
Post by mannmade on Nov 10, 2016 22:24:16 GMT -5
Mannkind licensed the technology so it's up to RLS to do what they want. I don't believe the licensing came with dictating what they can and can't do While I do not know the terms of the deal I am guessing it does set guidelines and parameters for what they can and cannot do. For example, otherwise what is to stop them from competing with MannKind if they could? Also am sure MannKind does not want them presenting a conflict for other possible deals using TS.
|
|