|
Post by kball on Feb 3, 2016 18:16:08 GMT -5
Nothing on Deerfield, Al or Insulin purchase agreement that i heard, but was bounced off the first 7 minutes. Although Matt did say agreements were trying to be redone as can be agreed on
|
|
|
Post by BlueCat on Feb 3, 2016 18:19:10 GMT -5
And that he'd let us know as soon as something tangible resolved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2016 18:24:50 GMT -5
Rev, with Bio and especially with disruptive technology it can be a little secret, but having said that, I personally have never seen a company so secret as Mnkd, but the more we learn about the Sny deal, it sounds like they absolutely have a stranglehold on things, more than I thought. What I hate, is Apr 5th and they ask for more time. Great about the time the money begins to run out (absent a deal), we get control back. Wonderful. Sure am counting on a very sweet goodbye kiss from Sny, but they do not play nice so not holding out much hope for that. IMO This will not be done on April 5th. I think it was pretty obvious since he stated asking for more time. This was always my concern from the day SNY dropped MNKD. A slow death to the share price while we are strung along. It would make sense for MNKD to be more transparent to keep share holder sentiment up. If they had cash go ahead beat the pps as much as you want but they need to raise cash. I have to go back and listen to the call. I was being open minded as possible but Corey kinda messed with my head a bit
|
|
|
Post by factspls88 on Feb 3, 2016 18:44:35 GMT -5
I'd like someone with authority to ask GS why it was so important for Jay Olsen to be on the call. What exactly is in it for them other than to see Afrezza dead and buried once and for all? And why is that so important to them?
|
|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Feb 3, 2016 18:47:16 GMT -5
I'd like someone with authority to ask GS why it was so important for Jay Olsen to be on the call. What exactly is in it for them other than to see Afrezza dead and buried once and for all? And why is that so important to them? Spot on. He just wanted to be on the call to say bankruptcy as many times as he could. Pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by BlueCat on Feb 3, 2016 18:59:20 GMT -5
I'd like someone with authority to ask GS why it was so important for Jay Olsen to be on the call. What exactly is in it for them other than to see Afrezza dead and buried once and for all? And why is that so important to them? Imagine being Matt presenting to this group and taking questions from them. And here you've just been saying that you've been engaged with the SEC (and certainly GS has been under microscope), while GS analyst keeps plugging away BK, BK, BK ..... Interesting dynamic. GS are brazen.
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Feb 3, 2016 19:55:02 GMT -5
I think the "B" word is fair game; it's a real shame, but it is. What a difference a year makes! I haven't listened yet, but my expectations have been lowered, so I'll probably think it was fine. Don't forget, most of us clamored for transparency, updates, etc., well, this is what they have now, they shouldn't make stuff up.
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:11:33 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by patten1962 on Feb 3, 2016 20:11:33 GMT -5
I think the "B" word is fair game; it's a real shame, but it is. What a difference a year makes! I haven't listened yet, but my expectations have been lowered, so I'll probably think it was fine. Don't forget, most of us clamored for transparency, updates, etc., well, this is what they have now, they shouldn't make stuff up. I am a little lost. My takes. #1. Insider buying. Matt said insiders are not allowed to buy back now. I believe he was alluding that there may be information coming. 2. Overseas sales in the works. 3 NJ clinic's. 3. No reverse merger. 4. Receptor Life Sciences is really not a new company but one that is established. Bad news people wanted to hear but did not. No buyout. And I have a question on this, could mannkind even sell with the Sanofi deal in place?
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:13:41 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by vestful on Feb 3, 2016 20:13:41 GMT -5
I think the "B" word is fair game; it's a real shame, but it is. What a difference a year makes! I haven't listened yet, but my expectations have been lowered, so I'll probably think it was fine. Don't forget, most of us clamored for transparency, updates, etc., well, this is what they have now, they shouldn't make stuff up. Yes, Matt did exactly what we were asking for, communication. It seems many here were expecting more but he responded to investor driven questions which was more than we have seen in the past.
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:16:22 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by patten1962 on Feb 3, 2016 20:16:22 GMT -5
I think the "B" word is fair game; it's a real shame, but it is. What a difference a year makes! I haven't listened yet, but my expectations have been lowered, so I'll probably think it was fine. Don't forget, most of us clamored for transparency, updates, etc., well, this is what they have now, they shouldn't make stuff up. Yes, Matt did exactly what we were asking for, communication. It seems many here were expecting more but he responded to investor driven questions which was more than we have seen in the past. What did u think about Matt's answer on inside buying? I thought that was very interesting!
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:20:34 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by vestful on Feb 3, 2016 20:20:34 GMT -5
I'm more pessimistic about any possible outcome but it was good to hear they have taken action.
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:21:26 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by goldfish on Feb 3, 2016 20:21:26 GMT -5
My thoughts. Was this conference call just to prop the sp overone dollar? Once again my hopes dashed.. no real new information or progress
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:28:04 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by biffn on Feb 3, 2016 20:28:04 GMT -5
If insiders know who is behind RLS, that would prevent purchases. At the same time, RLS can buy up to 4.99% MNKD without disclosure.
|
|
|
Shoutbox
Feb 3, 2016 20:34:55 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by patten1962 on Feb 3, 2016 20:34:55 GMT -5
If insiders know who is behind RLS, that would prevent purchases. At the same time, RLS can buy up to 4.99% MNKD without disclosure. Maybe they are! Would we know?
|
|