|
Post by agedhippie on Sept 5, 2016 16:07:53 GMT -5
He is reply to the two people who asked who the IP belongs to. As to the hope most everyone already knows this it never does any harm to repeat and those that don't already know it probably appreciate the information. In other words, you encourage people to blindly accept information from someone on the internet who didn't provide a source for all these people that did not know already or needed it repeated? What good does it do to share info and claim it factual if you don't provide a source? I had a whole long reply to this but scrapped it as Sophie said it better.
|
|
|
Post by factspls88 on Sept 5, 2016 16:25:43 GMT -5
Bryan Wilson? Well, God only knows if he did this on MNKD's behalf, wouldn't it be nice if we could be sure. I don't know about you but I'm feeling good vibrations.
|
|
|
Post by tayl5 on Sept 5, 2016 17:23:57 GMT -5
Bryan Wilson? Well, God only knows if he did this on MNKD's behalf, wouldn't it be nice if we could be sure. I don't know about you but I'm feeling good vibrations. Yeah, well Brian Wilson (not the Bryan in question) was also wrong when he said "The girls on the beach, are all within reach, if you know what to do..." You try it, see how far you get. Maybe I just didn't know what to do.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Sept 6, 2016 6:58:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slapshot on Sept 6, 2016 7:21:58 GMT -5
The uspto.gov website shows a little more info, namely that this application was first filed August 23, 2005, based on a provisional filed 8-23-2004... it shows they are still pursuing coverage over something invented over 10 years ago. There is no implication that the inventors are now employed at Mannkind.
Parent Continuity Data
Description Parent Number Parent Filing or 371(c) Date AIA(First Inventor to File) Parent Status Patent Number
This application is a Division of 14/150,474 01-08-2014 No Patented 9,259,471
is a continuation of 13/592,142 08-22-2012 No Patented 8,653,085
is a Division of 12/886,226 09-20-2010 No Patented 8,278,308
is a Division of 11/210,710 08-23-2005 No Patented 7,820,676
Claims Priority from Provisional Application 60/603,761 08-23-2004
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 19:10:13 GMT -5
The uspto.gov website shows a little more info, namely that this application was first filed August 23, 2005, based on a provisional filed 8-23-2004... it shows they are still pursuing coverage over something invented over 10 years ago. There is no implication that the inventors are now employed at Mannkind. Parent Continuity Data Description Parent Number Parent Filing or 371(c) Date AIA(First Inventor to File) Parent Status Patent Number This application is a Division of 14/150,474 01-08-2014 No Patented 9,259,471 is a continuation of 13/592,142 08-22-2012 No Patented 8,653,085 is a Division of 12/886,226 09-20-2010 No Patented 8,278,308 is a Division of 11/210,710 08-23-2005 No Patented 7,820,676 Claims Priority from Provisional Application 60/603,761 08-23-2004 Never said that ALL inventors were still currently employed at MannKind, now please, show me where you created this assumption. Also, like anyone with a brain that can write a message on the internet, you should know how to use the internet: copy and paste each person's name seperately and also individually (thus, creating unique and seperate internet seaches, resulting in all three being unique because they are independent upon one another aka individual) into the internet search bar of your choice, and see where they are currently employeed. Now, look at their work history, it is there, I know because I have done this simple search technique that is also elementary for using the internet. Now, Compare those dates with the patent dates and any other relevant imformation you wish to know. It is not rocket science to use the internet. Do not try this shit with me, I am not that naive and gullible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 19:17:21 GMT -5
Also, for anyone that keeps up with MannKind's patent's, he/she would know that this patent has been granted and expanded upon previously. That is WHY I said it was a patent APPLICATION that was just PUBLISHED. You realiy think I will let you derail this?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2016 2:33:02 GMT -5
Not all information is neatly packaged to be sourced. Some information comes about from experience and acquired knowledge. It is why courts summon experts in their fields instead of googling answers for evidence. Interpretation of information is also a highly developed skill that takes time and can't always be streamlined with an internet link. Sources aren't always helpful. I can find a source that still purports the earth is flat. Proof
I use this site to research the stuff I don't know about. If people bring up interesting information, I'll go check it out for myself. A message board poster shouldn't be trusted even if they do provide sources.
yes, ALL information is packaged to be source. Give me something, anything, and I will provide you a source. You just showed how ignorant you really are with your flat earth theory SOURCE. maybe you need to LEARN what a source is.
|
|
|
Post by prvs on Sept 9, 2016 6:32:54 GMT -5
Could we tone it down a little here? The sniping, name calling, is starting to resemble YMB. Thought we were better than that
|
|
|
Post by qwertqwert on Sept 9, 2016 7:37:47 GMT -5
Could we tone it down a little here? The sniping, name calling, is starting to resemble YMB. Thought we were better than that I guess you can blame that on mnkd as well. I mean, really not much to talk about these days. I'm off, to hit f5 on www.receptorlife.com again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2016 3:44:36 GMT -5
Could we tone it down a little here? The sniping, name calling, is starting to resemble YMB. Thought we were better than that I completely understand, and agree I should not say certain things, but if I held back I would not be my true self, and I don't like fakes. And I mean no disrespect towards you in saying that. Understand, there are people on this message board who make it their mission to try to instill disinformation and fear into vulnerable newcomers and even self-doubting long time investors. This is my first and only investment in the stock market. I did myresearch, and there is still a lot I do not know, however, I am not new to debate, presenting information, online discussion, and spotting a fake when I see one. I care more about seeing the visions of all the people I have talked about on this forum succeed, and because I have done my DD and believe in them, I am unwilling to let people with an opposite agenda, one that is obvious and should be to you all, spread misleading and/or disinformation. I don't do it for the sake of arguement, I do it because I believe and care about what MannKind represents and also what their affiliates represent. I don't apologize for anything I have said or any language I have used though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2016 4:02:12 GMT -5
Look at my post history. I have laid my deepest thoughts about this stuff on here for all to read. I have provided a lot of factual information as well. I won't stop being me until I am banned from this forum.
|
|