|
|
Post by mnkdd on Apr 2, 2014 18:15:06 GMT -5
I was unimpressed with Matt's performance. He got teed up a bunch of times and whiffed, it seems like. The reporter was filling in more useful info than he was, reminding him about the fast entry/exit, etc. They should have just brought in one of the public speakers from the ADCOM, lol. Well, yes, a few of the AdCom speakers would have been preferable, but some of those are more used to the spotlight. Matt's a CFO, not a CEO, so this national televised interview was outside of his comfort zone, but as far as bringing up things, I just as soon let Sue H. bring it up, gives more credibility and also makes it seem like she's actually following MNKD some, rather than having read a two paragraph synopsis about it half hour before the interview. I thought the whole thing was fine, and Sue Herrera is a big name on CNBC, so that gave the whole thing a bit more gravitas. But, make no mistake, the shorts will continue to hack and chisel away, until they no longer can. True, I'm just glad MNKD got the plug-- definitely good publicity. |
|
|
|
Post by 4allthemarbles on Apr 2, 2014 23:03:11 GMT -5
I was unimpressed with Matt's performance. He got teed up a bunch of times and whiffed, it seems like. The reporter was filling in more useful info than he was, reminding him about the fast entry/exit, etc. They should have just brought in one of the public speakers from the ADCOM, lol. This was just a case of being a little nervous. It's easy to conduct a conference call with all the time in the world versus live TV with 3 minutes and no room for error. |
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Apr 3, 2014 11:20:39 GMT -5
I like what Matt said as well and his mention of technosphere platform and pain. What I didn't like was the lack of respect of the show to bury the story on page 37 at the bottom corner. The other stories before it were minor and unimportant. This reinforces the power of the media and how they want something portrayed. I still consider the street and the motley fool in combination with others as a strong force moving the market the way Jim Cramer wants it to move. This to me is a monopoly and doesn't represent anything close to equal representation in the press; not that I want MNKD "Hyped" but a little respect would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Apr 3, 2014 12:54:51 GMT -5
I hate your new frickin' avatar. I can't stop watching it... How long does it go on for? I waited over a minute and it still circles. Ban it instead of banning people traveling in Cambodia! JPG |
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Apr 3, 2014 13:29:37 GMT -5
Ha Ha Ha. "I'm neutral on this" with his hands up in the air as if a gun is pointed at him. Nice that he gives himself a neutral when his players have hit this company with everything they had.
|
|
|
|
Post by otherottawaguy on Apr 3, 2014 13:32:52 GMT -5
Do you really believe he is the puppet master and not one of puppets? I am guessing he (Cramer) is but one of the puppets being used to provide the show.
OOG
|
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Apr 3, 2014 13:46:31 GMT -5
Do you really believe he is the puppet master and not one of puppets? I am guessing he (Cramer) is but one of the puppets being used to provide the show. OOG Cramer's show is for entertainment purposes only.. he tells you. But the subject is money. He created "the Street". Has he no influence on what he creates? He says he has no opinion on MNKD; do you believe that. How bout the articles maybe 30 of them the day before and on the adcom All Hit pieces... just a coincidence. Adcom gives approval. Motley fool and The Street go silent. No.. he may not be the only puppeteer but he is certainly one of them. With his body language of Hands up in the Air.. is a psychological profile of someone on the defensive showing he isn't carrying a gun. My opinion; no one else need concur. I've come to recognize that when cramer gives a thumbs up on a stock; the next day it is often plundered. So, with this video that Brentie presented with Cramer saying he's neutral to me is the same as saying to the Short Interest "don't know what to tell ya, but I'm on your side and can't say so". I think the guy is totally full of sh*t. |
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Apr 3, 2014 14:08:07 GMT -5
To those who follow the guy a bit: how often does Cramer say he has no opinion on a company? Why would he say he has no opinion other then to later, if things get ugly for whatever reason, point to the fact he has repeatedly stated he has no opinion?
|
|
|
|
Post by notamnkdmillionaire on Apr 3, 2014 16:30:57 GMT -5
To those who follow the guy a bit: how often does Cramer say he has no opinion on a company? Why would he say he has no opinion other then to later, if things get ugly for whatever reason, point to the fact he has repeatedly stated he has no opinion? Cramer saying he has no opinion on a stock is like Obama saying he has on opinion on health care reform. He's a lying scheming POS just like Obama. Didn't mean to bring politics in it but the comparison makes my point. |
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Apr 4, 2014 11:13:14 GMT -5
I didn't talk politics. If you don't want to bring politics into this then don't bring it up? What is the point? This is a Mannkimd forum and relatively free of pointless political nastiness. There is enough of that everywhere else!
|
|
/production/original_573352236.gif)
