dang
Newbie
Posts: 20 
|
Post by dang on Aug 30, 2017 13:30:00 GMT -5
Is it real this time or just another illusion? As long as I've had this stock and everything us extra-longs have gone through.... its not real.  |
|
|
|
Post by kite on Aug 30, 2017 13:30:59 GMT -5
Let's break $2 and never look back!
|
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Aug 30, 2017 13:33:29 GMT -5
My prediction was for $2 on Friday ... don't jinx me !
LOL
?? Or did I say by Friday? I just checked and Alice said by Friday!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 30, 2017 13:36:47 GMT -5
We need to break the 200 day on high volume. Then the real rally starts. We need some really good news. Otherwise, it's just traders chasing the momentum. The really good news is Afrezza is a very fine insulin. The powers that be tried their hardest to take it down. stories that Afrezza was not selling. no where in the stories did I read, the insurance companies and pharmacy purchasing managers were not paying for afrezza. The true story is, once insurance pays for afrezza, see ya, rapid acting subq analogs. you are old and lousy, Afrezza, new and improved. (No matter what agedhippee endocrinologists' say. the chit aged is on is old and lousy.)
|
|
|
|
Post by joeypotsandpans on Aug 30, 2017 13:43:04 GMT -5
the slow daily grind higher has been accumulation as opposed to swing trading, if you chart and pull up OBV (on balance volume) it will show you the price increase is following the increased volume recently. Increased SP takes care of a lot of things including size of dilution. This one is for you RSR, you need to play this at your next gig....any lovin is good lovin, a little BTO...Joey is awake!!  www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFRk0FfaQi0 |
|
|
|
Post by novafett on Aug 30, 2017 13:44:09 GMT -5
Horey smokeys 20%!!
|
|
|
|
Post by casualinvestor on Aug 30, 2017 13:47:06 GMT -5
A combination of confirmation of Deerfield debt extension to Oct 31st (which I haven't seen any news about, but some people would know), and the VA news? The contract may have been from a couple months ago, but the posted date was 8/29/17. So it's new to the public domain
Synopsis:
Added: May 18, 2017 2:41 pm Modified: Aug 29, 2017 3:25 pmTrack Changes
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 30, 2017 13:50:44 GMT -5
A combination of confirmation of Deerfield debt extension to Oct 31st (which I haven't seen any news about, but some people would know), and the VA news? The contract may have been from a couple months ago, but the posted date was 8/29/17. So it's new to the public domain Synopsis: Added: May 18, 2017 2:41 pm Modified: Aug 29, 2017 3:25 pmTrack Changes or label change leak. or label change uppy. or UAE leak. uppy.
Or, they just couldn't keep a good insulin down. (no refrigeration required.)
|
|
|
|
Post by kc on Aug 30, 2017 13:53:15 GMT -5
Something is up. I have a new view using ML system and see a lot of "INTER MARKET SWEEP ORDER" Showing up. I had not ever seen or heard of this but here is what IB says its about.
ibkr.info/node/1734
Intermarket Sweep
overview:
An intermarket sweep order is generally a large quantity limit order that is sent to multiple exchanges simultaneously. The trader submitting this type of order is required to fulfill Regulation NMS order protection obligations and exchange rules by simultaneously sending orders to market centers with better prices than the defined order limit.
Background:
Traders may see, on occasion, execution prices reported to time and sales that are at price levels through an order that they may have had working at the time. Some time and sales service providers reflect these prints with a special designation (intermarket sweep). The TWS software does not display these designations, therefore, it may appear as if a order was due an execution when it may not have been.
This article is being written in attempt to assist traders in understanding intermarket sweep transactions.
When an intermarket sweep order is being executed, only the inside quote (NBBO) at each available exchange is "protected". This means that orders resting on an exchange at prices that are inferior to the best bid or ask prices at the time of the intermarket sweep print are not considered to be "protected" and may be traded through.
Example:
An order is submitted in the pre market to sell at a price of 40.80 and is sent to exchange A.
The best offer price on exchagne A is 40.63.
Exchange B receives an intermarket sweep order to buy 800 shares of the stock at a limit price of 40.88.
The best offer price on exchange B is 40.88
The trader that enters the intermarket sweep order would be required to fulfill their Regulation NMS requirement by executing the maximum available quantity on exchange A at 40.63 and then may execute the balance of the order on exchange B at 40.88 even though it is at a price that is inferior to the 40.80 order resting in the book on exchagne A. The 40.80 price is not the inside quote and is therefore not "protected" in terms of the balance of the sweep order executing at exchange B at a price of 40.88.
A wealth of information is available on the web regarding intermarket sweep orders and SEC regulation NMS. The following are some links that may be useful in terms of providing additional information on these topics;
SEC Regulation NMS Rule June 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
Post by rockstarrick on Aug 30, 2017 13:54:18 GMT -5
Sold my Jan 2019 $1.50 calls, my Jan 2018 $1.00 calls and bought 70% as many shares (Had to add some cash on top of the proceeds). Cost basis = $.67 per share, and no expiry! Takes advantage of a successful trade and lowers the volatility. Not a huge position, but the price is right, and makes up for the risk in the investment. rockstarrick - how's that for a bit of optimism? Great News !!! In @ .67/share, that's a really good average. What the heck happened today ?? I just checked in and we seem to have Volume, and we're up. I guess I better catch up. Good Luck Derek |
|
|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Aug 30, 2017 13:54:36 GMT -5
I must say I would not have thought I would be cheering for $2.00 today. I was thinking up 5 cents. It's good to be wrong sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by promann on Aug 30, 2017 13:54:49 GMT -5
A combination of confirmation of Deerfield debt extension to Oct 31st (which I haven't seen any news about, but some people would know), and the VA news? The contract may have been from a couple months ago, but the posted date was 8/29/17. So it's new to the public domain Synopsis: Added: May 18, 2017 2:41 pm Modified: Aug 29, 2017 3:25 pmTrack Changes Yes Casual, Probably a combination of them things plus others like Label change decision. Lets get this over 2.00 today and don't look back. Nice day Today |
|
|
|
Post by kbrion77 on Aug 30, 2017 13:57:47 GMT -5
Have seen this before folks watch the traders take it right down without anything material.
|
|
|
|
Post by lojothehus on Aug 30, 2017 14:00:37 GMT -5
Have seen this before folks watch the traders take it right down without anything material. Hopefully, you're wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by casualinvestor on Aug 30, 2017 14:09:42 GMT -5
Profit-taking is what happens with any large gain. As much as I love seeing +20%, +10% or +15% is still a good day |
|
