|
Post by golfeveryday on Mar 12, 2017 15:42:49 GMT -5
Right now is $20 in my opinion, or $4 pre RS. Just ridiculous the amount of manipulation and the continued commentary from management. Holding super long term but something needs to start happening asap. Management speaks a good game...let's see it. If Rx ever starts to gain some traction for any extended period of time this will run like crazy, especially with 5x fewer shares.
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Mar 12, 2017 15:59:30 GMT -5
I posted this yesterday but might not have hit "create post"..... looks like another youngster on Afrezza ... slowly but surely afrezzajustbreathe.com/afre... left hand side of page "afrezza teenage youth"
|
|
|
Post by cedafuntennis on Mar 12, 2017 20:54:25 GMT -5
Are you posting for the sake of posting or you simply want to show your ignorance? There are no 5x fewer shares buddy. Either have no business being allowed next to electronic devices or you are trying to fool others. In any case go away. [1quote author=" golfeveryday" source="/post/98939/thread" timestamp="1489351369"] Right now is $20 in my opinion, or $4 pre RS. Just ridiculous the amount of manipulation and the continued commentary from management. Holding super long term but something needs to start happening asap. Management speaks a good game...let's see it. If Rx ever starts to gain some traction for any extended period of time this will run like crazy, especially with 5x fewer shares. [/quote]
|
|
|
Post by buyitonsale on Mar 13, 2017 0:31:48 GMT -5
95.6M is 5 times fewer than 478M. Looks like an unforced error to me.
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Mar 13, 2017 9:06:10 GMT -5
95.6M is 5 times fewer than 478M. Looks like an unforced error to me. They are partly right, there are fewer shares but not for the reason they think. You buy by value and not by number of shares if you are being disciplined about your investment. When the reverse split happened there are a 1/5th of the shares, but those shares are also worth 5x as much so its'a a wash in terms of position value. Why are they partially right? Because the share price dropped 25% on the RS so there is a mismatch - 1/5th the number of shares, but only 4x the value which means it will take more shares to cover the position. Ultimately it's no big deal for the shorts because it's not a significant amount of shares, and they they just made a quick 25% off the RS.
|
|
|
Post by cedafuntennis on Mar 14, 2017 13:04:05 GMT -5
That is meaningless. It can be 1 share at $200 mil or 50 billion at fractions of a penny. That does not matter one iota. What matter is the future of Afrezza and that the company proves that it is a viable product and sales pick up. A space rocket is available and much faster than the train, but it is feasible for Earth travel? Not really. Afrezza is far superior to anything else on the market but unless they manage to sell it and have improved patient retention, it will join the space rocket for Earth travel regardless of how many share there are.
|
|
|
Post by buyitonsale on Mar 14, 2017 13:57:07 GMT -5
Fewer shares does make a difference from supply and demand prospective. If better news ahead, fewer shares will help the price IMO. The price is important to get next round of financing.
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Mar 14, 2017 19:00:29 GMT -5
Fewer shares does make a difference from supply and demand prospective. If better news ahead, fewer shares will help the price IMO. The price is important to get next round of financing. Not really... people (and funds) don't make decisions that they want to purchase X number of shares without regard for price... at least anyone that I know of. The decision is that "I want to invest X amount of dollars in company Y." After a reverse split it takes fewer shares to equal that dollar amount. So theoretically the demand adjusts in lock step with the supply of shares for RS... or similarly for "forward" splits. If you're reasoning were to be true then companies would not do splits since that would tend to make the share price go down. In either case supply-demand balance does not change, and in fact the psychological aspect of it on investor sentiment seems to have exactly the opposite effect of the one you're hoping for, making gains harder after an RS and easier after a split... which is somewhat logical given that RS is done because of drop in price not expected to quickly reverse on its own and splits are done because of share price rise that is anticipated to continue. Yes, our current market cap would make it difficult to raise equity capital of the magnitude needed.
|
|
|
Post by buyitonsale on Mar 14, 2017 22:39:44 GMT -5
Tell everybody you know to buy some MNKD and hold it till they win!
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Mar 15, 2017 16:16:07 GMT -5
Tell everybody you know to buy some MNKD and hold it till they win! Many of us were burned by advising people to buy MNKD in the past... and some of them were burned by listening to us. Sadly right now there is a very real "or it goes bankrupt" that would need to go at the end of that statement if one were being at all honest about the possibilities facing MNKD. If it is money that one realistic can lose in its entirety then MNKD could be a very high risk, very high potential reward stock. At this point I wouldn't mind recommending it as gambling with better odds than Vegas to someone... but my credibility was shot with everyone I know regarding MNKD because I told people to buy at 20x the price were at now. If one isn't looking to roll the dice, I'd recommend waiting to buy MNKD until there is some change that shows how they will escape current cash flow black hole. We are teetering on the event horizon.
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Mar 15, 2017 19:07:42 GMT -5
Shoot, all I have to say is "Mannkind," and it's like I just brought up the anti-Christ!
|
|
|
Post by kball on Mar 15, 2017 20:07:43 GMT -5
Tell everybody you know to buy some MNKD and hold it till they win! Many of us were burned by advising people to buy MNKD in the past... and some of them were burned by listening to us. Sadly right now there is a very real "or it goes bankrupt" that would need to go at the end of that statement if one were being at all honest about the possibilities facing MNKD. If it is money that one realistic can lose in its entirety then MNKD could be a very high risk, very high potential reward stock. At this point I wouldn't mind recommending it as gambling with better odds than Vegas to someone... but my credibility was shot with everyone I know regarding MNKD because I told people to buy at 20x the price were at now.If one isn't looking to roll the dice, I'd recommend waiting to buy MNKD until there is some change that shows how they will escape current cash flow black hole. We are teetering on the event horizon. If they held, yeah. But maybe they got out at some point while we held? Now if you advised them to keep holding all the way down...thats harder to justify (I finally caved at about $1 pre split)
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Mar 15, 2017 20:18:23 GMT -5
The buy out talk is starting again. Some crazy person said Matt gots one he's been sitting on for $12 pps. Let's see that's really 3 dollars a share right? Let's wait till we have something to show for ourselves!
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Mar 15, 2017 20:22:18 GMT -5
The buy out talk is starting again. Some crazy person said Matt gots one he's been sitting on for $12 pps. Let's see that's really 3 dollars a share right? Let's wait till we have something to show for ourselves! where is that speak going on Sports?
|
|
|
Post by golfeveryday on Mar 15, 2017 20:35:58 GMT -5
The buy out talk is starting again. Some crazy person said Matt gots one he's been sitting on for $12 pps. Let's see that's really 3 dollars a share right? Let's wait till we have something to show for ourselves! $12 pre split would be okay with me at this point.
|
|