|
Post by peppy on Apr 7, 2017 20:24:45 GMT -5
I can't DM you and I don't have Twitter, so this is the only way to say you might have been right several months ago when we spoke via DM as to where MNKD might be heading. This is based on this evenings new filing by MNKD. I just DM'd you. Heh, report back.
|
|
|
Post by kingedxxxxx on Apr 9, 2017 14:02:31 GMT -5
it's not robot... it's real people. real stupig idiotic people like me... I alone get back into this trap for 20k shares using up all my margin. deeply regretted that! Did anyone confirm where the misinformation on script numbers started? Was it just from one poster that started what became a rumor of a huge jump on the script count or were the numbers incorrectly posted elsewhere? I have followed MNKD since I sold out early in morning of the partnership announcement dumping last shares above $10. Have not bought back since. Friday morning, I saw the immediate pop in share price and found the postings of a huge jump in scripts. I readied a 100k purchase and held off to see how share price reacted and then had to head out for the day. Decided not to buy. Then, I found out that the numbers were incorrect and was very glad I did not pull the trigger. I find it staggering that one poster (if that was the case) could cause this much of a move in share price by posting misinformation. I have stated for a long time that a real move up in scripts was the only reason to think about buying into MNKD. So far, I have been proven right. Sorry that this was not the beginning of something positive for shareholders.
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 9, 2017 14:14:33 GMT -5
it's not robot... it's real people. real stupig idiotic people like me... I alone get back into this trap for 20k shares using up all my margin. deeply regretted that! Did anyone confirm where the misinformation on script numbers started? Was it just from one poster that started what became a rumor of a huge jump on the script count or were the numbers incorrectly posted elsewhere? I have followed MNKD since I sold out early in morning of the partnership announcement dumping last shares above $10. Have not bought back since. Friday morning, I saw the immediate pop in share price and found the postings of a huge jump in scripts. I readied a 100k purchase and held off to see how share price reacted and then had to head out for the day. Decided not to buy. Then, I found out that the numbers were incorrect and was very glad I did not pull the trigger. I find it staggering that one poster (if that was the case) could cause this much of a move in share price by posting misinformation. I have stated for a long time that a real move up in scripts was the only reason to think about buying into MNKD. So far, I have been proven right. Sorry that this was not the beginning of something positive for shareholders. The numbers are posted every Friday here and on ST. So it wasn't really a rumor. It was a mistake. And the very first one ever. I do believe it caused many to do what you almost did king. The monthly numbers got posted instead of the weekly.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Apr 9, 2017 14:54:41 GMT -5
it's not robot... it's real people. real stupig idiotic people like me... I alone get back into this trap for 20k shares using up all my margin. deeply regretted that! Did anyone confirm where the misinformation on script numbers started? Was it just from one poster that started what became a rumor of a huge jump on the script count or were the numbers incorrectly posted elsewhere? I have followed MNKD since I sold out early in morning of the partnership announcement dumping last shares above $10. Have not bought back since. Friday morning, I saw the immediate pop in share price and found the postings of a huge jump in scripts. I readied a 100k purchase and held off to see how share price reacted and then had to head out for the day. Decided not to buy. Then, I found out that the numbers were incorrect and was very glad I did not pull the trigger. I find it staggering that one poster (if that was the case) could cause this much of a move in share price by posting misinformation. I have stated for a long time that a real move up in scripts was the only reason to think about buying into MNKD. So far, I have been proven right. Sorry that this was not the beginning of something positive for shareholders. Quote: Did anyone confirm where the misinformation on script numbers started? Reply: I say it can not be ruled out, that the script numbers were input wrong into Bloomberg, and then corrected.
|
|
|
Post by seanismorris on Apr 9, 2017 15:17:47 GMT -5
Russian proverb: "Доверяй, но проверяй" {Doveryai, no proveryai}
(trust, but verify)
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 9, 2017 15:34:53 GMT -5
Peppy, so do you think we will no longer get numbers?
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Apr 9, 2017 16:43:01 GMT -5
Peppy, so do you think we will no longer get numbers? I think we will keep getting numbers.
Ripano said he checked the numbers twice. I believe ripano.
I think there is a good chance the numbers were keyed in wrong at the Bloomberg terminal end, then corrected. That's all.
Like you said, mistakes happen. I make mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by boytroy88 on Apr 9, 2017 17:06:20 GMT -5
Peppy, so do you think we will no longer get numbers? I think (hope) that Ripano just won't post on ST.
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 9, 2017 17:10:23 GMT -5
Peppy, so do you think we will no longer get numbers? I think (hope) that Ripano just won't post on ST. Didn't his account on ST get canceled?
|
|
|
Post by sla55 on Apr 9, 2017 17:16:16 GMT -5
I think (hope) that Ripano just won't post on ST. Didn't his account on ST get canceled? Yes, he said his Stock Twits account was suspended.
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Apr 9, 2017 17:35:15 GMT -5
Didn't his account on ST get canceled? Yes, he said his Stock Twits account was suspended. Un real:-( I guess they considered it fake news. In that case half the world would lose their accounts on ST and Twitter.. What about the people that posts lies on ST week after week!
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Apr 9, 2017 17:40:52 GMT -5
Personally, I think we can put to rest the mistake of script numbers. It appears to be an accident. The volume continued much higher even after the correction at 10:00 EST. there was still 5 hours left of trading and volume continued to increase over the average volume per day.. GL
|
|
|
Post by kingedxxxxx on Apr 9, 2017 20:04:23 GMT -5
Personally, I think we can put to rest the mistake of script numbers. It appears to be an accident. The volume continued much higher even after the correction at 10:00 EST. there was still 5 hours left of trading and volume continued to increase over the average volume per day.. GL Fine. I do thank those that responded. I also think that it is possible that the numbers were originally inputted incorrectly and then adjusted as some suspect. My point is that this type of thing can cause people to lose some serious money. Many years ago my brother was holding puts in American Airlines (not 100% sure if this was the one.) I think the stock had been trading around $7. Suddenly, there was some kind of info that hit the wires that they were filing BK (or thinking about it) and the stock suddenly dropped below $2. My brother quickly tried to sell his puts for what would have been ridiculous short-term gains. It may have been something like $50-100k profit on a $2-3k investment in a matter of a few days holding the puts if he could have sold. Before he could find a buyer, the stock was halted. During the halt, the information was proven false and the stock reopened close to its prior share price before the dramatic plunge. Not sure if they backed out all of the trades that occurred during the drop, but this is an example of what can happen when bad information gets out there. If my brother did get to sell and the trade was not reversed, that buyer stood to lose significantly when the stock recovered. Luckily, in the case Friday, the shares did not trade much higher than they did.
|
|
|
Post by madog365 on Apr 9, 2017 21:38:35 GMT -5
Personally, I think we can put to rest the mistake of script numbers. It appears to be an accident. The volume continued much higher even after the correction at 10:00 EST. there was still 5 hours left of trading and volume continued to increase over the average volume per day.. GL Fine. I do thank those that responded. I also think that it is possible that the numbers were originally inputted incorrectly and then adjusted as some suspect. My point is that this type of thing can cause people to lose some serious money. Many years ago my brother was holding puts in American Airlines (not 100% sure if this was the one.) I think the stock had been trading around $7. Suddenly, there was some kind of info that hit the wires that they were filing BK (or thinking about it) and the stock suddenly dropped below $2. My brother quickly tried to sell his puts for what would have been ridiculous short-term gains. It may have been something like $50-100k profit on a $2-3k investment in a matter of a few days holding the puts if he could have sold. Before he could find a buyer, the stock was halted. During the halt, the information was proven false and the stock reopened close to its prior share price before the dramatic plunge. Not sure if they backed out all of the trades that occurred during the drop, but this is an example of what can happen when bad information gets out there. If my brother did get to sell and the trade was not reversed, that buyer stood to lose significantly when the stock recovered. Luckily, in the case Friday, the shares did not trade much higher than they did. Let's put anecdotes aside for a second, the fact of the matter is you were going to make a significant trade based on anonymous information that was posted on a message board. Anyone doing that should reconsider their trading strategy. If you were lose your money on false information, it would be no one else's fault but your own.
|
|
|
Post by uvula on Apr 9, 2017 21:43:37 GMT -5
King, one should never make important decisions based on unverified information from 1 anonymous person you don't know who posted on a free internet message board. Particularly when the data were puzzling and seemed too good to be true.
|
|