|
Post by awesomo on May 2, 2019 9:45:58 GMT -5
Appears to be the storm before the calm. My money's on Mike coming through. GLTA What storm are you talking about? The PPS bleeds down every day, scripts are flat, the TV campaign was completely ineffective in terms of script growth (with management slinking away saying they would “evaluate” performance), not a word from management on the DTC and Brazil. We’re all just waiting around for the earnings call which never has had any material developments. All while hoping more dilution doesn’t drop out of nowhere which seems more likely now that we are below the $1.60 warrants. It is like clockwork for this stock.
|
|
|
Post by winstonsmith on May 2, 2019 10:00:11 GMT -5
There's definitely script growth or there wouldn't be revenue growth. Product is being distributed differently so that's obscuring things. Listen, I'm not a big MC fan because he wasn't smart enough to know that he used an ineffective commercial. He's also made other sales team blunders and lies about dilution. I think we're stuck with him and I'd be hesitant to buy more shares since you can't trust him in terms of dilution. I'm 50% down on my new position after the split. Seems like a sink hole until they get it right.
|
|
|
Post by #NoMoreNeedles on May 2, 2019 10:16:58 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands.
|
|
|
Post by traderdennis on May 2, 2019 10:20:16 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands. Not enough shares in the vault to dilute right now. But I do believe a deal has been strict with Deerfield and they are selling shares before they receive delivery. Probably around 1.40 a share for their payment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2019 10:22:55 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands. NO WAY.....That would be SUICIDE.
|
|
|
Post by longliner on May 2, 2019 10:33:55 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands. I am expecting some type of a deal that LLY enters into with some conbination of UTHR, MNKD and RLS that moves them into the CBD/MJ space, allows excusivity to extend patent protection with Technosphere Cialis. And moves them into organ transplant. Since they currently license UTHR to use the PAH treatment to be used in Trepostinil Technosphere and the UTHR CEO has stated that this poduct will double, then double again the value of the company in the 2020s it would seem like a prudent blockbuster deal.
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on May 2, 2019 10:43:21 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands. Not enough shares in the vault to dilute right now. But I do believe a deal has been strict with Deerfield and they are selling shares before they receive delivery. Probably around 1.40 a share for their payment. You’re right, they are using the ATM, that’s what’s going on here. Or seems to be.
|
|
|
Post by pat on May 2, 2019 10:46:16 GMT -5
Boy, guess I better sell all my shares.
Or go back to sleep.
Meh. I’ll go back to sleep.
Wake me in January when some of my options expire.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2019 10:54:31 GMT -5
I am expecting another round of dilution prior to ASM at $1.25 or lower with Leerink, BTIG, HCW and our friends from the Cayman Islands. Not enough shares in the vault to dilute right now. But I do believe a deal has been strict with Deerfield and they are selling shares before they receive delivery. Probably around 1.40 a share for their payment. Dennis, Do you think any warrants were included in the current Deerfield deal you speak of? If warrants used, would there have to be shares available, 1 deliverable share (ie authorized, issued & outstanding) for each warrant?
|
|
|
Post by traderdennis on May 2, 2019 11:09:44 GMT -5
Not enough shares in the vault to dilute right now. But I do believe a deal has been strict with Deerfield and they are selling shares before they receive delivery. Probably around 1.40 a share for their payment. Dennis, Do you think any warrants were included in the current Deerfield deal you speak of? If warrants used, would there have to be shares available, 1 deliverable share (ie authorized, issued & outstanding) for each warrant? Warrants count against total authorized shares. I don't know if DF is a participant and holder of warrants. What I believe I am seeing is selling before an announce of DF payment in shares over the last two days. I may open a short long swing if there is an announcement of payment. I won't hold the position over earnings if I do it.
|
|
|
Post by joeypotsandpans on May 2, 2019 11:17:00 GMT -5
LOL!! Great thread for the trolls Lot of insane folks here, bitching year after year and continue to hold or speak like their holders etc. and for the sour ones that continue to hold, be careful what you wish for...you can have all the CEO's you can possibly dream of but at the end of the day it doesn't change the hand the company was dealt. Afrezza is phenomenal, will continue to be phenomenal and as stated before why torture yourselves month in and month out...sell and move on. I believe if you don't have someone managing your funds for you and you're doing it yourself than Caveat Emptor applies to buying into your companies via purchasing stock. Don't blame anyone and everyone else and accept responsibility for your own due diligence. No one held a gun to anyone's head to push the buy button...and you're free to push the sell button at anytime as well...or you can just continue to feed the trolls You may not care for what I'm writing but it's the simple truth. If you don't like or approve of the CEO, vote with your shares either annually or by unloading them...so mytakeonit and others can continue to accumulate ca·ve·at emp·tor /ˌkavēˌät ˈem(p)ˌtôr/ noun the principle that the buyer alone is responsible for checking the quality and suitability of goods before a purchase is made. "caveat emptor still applies when you are buying your house"
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on May 2, 2019 11:58:08 GMT -5
Joey, it seems you are overlooking a basic dynamic at play here. Many long time holders who you characterize as insane and "bitching year after year and continue to hold" - these long time holders believe in the phenomenal and unprecedented efficacy of Afrezza. And that belief grounds their investment. Why would they sell now as you suggest, with the share price in the tank? To the contrary, it is their right to continue holding, expecting the market to eventually figure it out. That does not mean they shouldn't be allowed to voice concerns in the way the company is being run. You don't have to agree with those concerns, it's a message board and so inherently everyone won't agree with each other.
You're not the only one who does it Joey, but it isn't right for folks who post facts or opinions that aren't rosy and bubbly to be automatically labelled trolls or shorts. It's inaccurate and does this message board a disservice.
|
|
|
Post by wgreystone on May 2, 2019 12:53:03 GMT -5
It's just dumb to request pay/bonus cut for folks working in Mannkind. If anyone believes they are not qualified, cutting pay will not make them qualified. If they are qualified, then it's better to worry about how to retain them instead.
|
|
|
Post by cedafuntennis on May 2, 2019 12:59:02 GMT -5
It's just dumb to request pay/bonus cut for folks working in Mannkind. If anyone believes they are not qualified, cutting pay will not make them qualified. If they are qualified, then it's better to worry about how to retain them instead. The pay should be mostly performance metric based and strictly enforced. Shareholder value must be the second pillar on the metrics, right after net income growth metric. No way around it. And the evaluation should be team based, not individual vertical based as they all must work as a team or we all fail.
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on May 2, 2019 13:10:42 GMT -5
Yeah joey ... go sit in the corner ! Is the Criticism Fair? Yes. But only fair. Not really Bad ... or really Great ... just fair. As for people not having patience ... kinda seems like that. But, you must know that we have patients ... many, many diabetic patients who are trickling in at the moment due to word of mouth. The eruption is about to start and the lava will be flowing to over run these trolls and shorts and people with short long swings (whatever that means). Probably not meant to be on a kid's playground. But, that's mytakeonit
|
|