|
Post by kpm1028 on Apr 23, 2015 9:05:13 GMT -5
Pulled this from ymb, would like to get some valuable opinions on the reasoning, could it just be they are going with a different name?
Goods and Services (ABANDONED) IC 005. US 006 018 044 046 051 052. G & S: Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, an inhaler drug delivery system comprised of an inhaler filled with pharmaceutical preparations for the administration by inhalation of a wide variety of therapeutic agents formulated as dry powders
Serial Number 85169782
Filing Date: November 4, 2010
Published for Opposition November 22, 2011
Owner (APPLICANT) MannKind Corporation CORPORATION DELAWARE 28903 North Avenue Paine Valencia CALIFORNIA 91355
Attorney of Record Marc T. Morley, Esq.
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Abandonment Date February 23, 2015
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2015 11:49:59 GMT -5
no clue but im sure the tinfoil hats on YMB will lead down the path of this being a great indication of a buyout. Maybe its already covered under a different patent? Who knows, doubt it means anything like 90% of the stuff brought up there.
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Apr 23, 2015 13:10:23 GMT -5
no clue but im sure the tinfoil hats on YMB will lead down the path of this being a great indication of a buyout. Maybe its already covered under a different patent? Who knows, doubt it means anything like 90% of the stuff brought up there. This is big news: I think it will no longer be called the cricket but will henceforth be called the Gecko. Why Gecko? Because they are much more friendly then pesky crickets and 'it's so obvious' that it doesn't even need further explanation. You know what that means right? Where do you see geckos on TV? Adds for insurance companies... Who owns these insurance companies? Yes Buffet! So it should now be obvious there will be a 1 for 1 swap of Berkshire shares for Mannkind shares! Even YMB couldn't come up with that kind of 'news' I'm certain...
|
|
|
Post by liane on Apr 23, 2015 13:33:31 GMT -5
Don't you wish - jpg!
|
|
|
Post by bradleysbest on Apr 23, 2015 13:42:23 GMT -5
Imagine the possibilities with my new Avatar!!!
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Apr 23, 2015 13:45:24 GMT -5
I suspect they have a new formulation of a proprietary cannabis combined with TS and they needed a catchy name for the inhaler. It will now be known as the "grasshopper". Get it!? grass (cannabis) hopper (holder, container, etc). OK. I know all you brilliant ones will catch why I explained it. Right!?
|
|
|
Post by otherottawaguy on Apr 23, 2015 15:31:58 GMT -5
I be happy with a one for one swap of the Berkshire "B"s...
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Apr 23, 2015 15:57:10 GMT -5
other.. what does that mean to dummies like me?
Does that me MNKD abandoned because a buyout is in the works? so why file? I've always believed a BO would be at least 18 months -24 months away if even that soon.. what's your take on that? Volume doesn't indicate something like a BO is behind this?
|
|
|
Post by james on Apr 23, 2015 16:08:44 GMT -5
I'm confused.
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Apr 23, 2015 20:05:17 GMT -5
I just went through a trademark renewal. You have to show that it is an actively used trademark. I'm not sure of the ins and outs of whether you can maintain a trademark, such as "cricket", indefinitely if it isn't actually being sold. Maybe highlighting it on a website is enough to be considered active, but maybe it isn't. If the registration falls dead for that reason it wouldn't necessarily mean they wouldn't file again later with the same name.
And as for that Gecko suggestion... pish-posh, they are all show and no substance... flashy TV playboy types. How about Chameleon?
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Apr 23, 2015 20:58:35 GMT -5
When I heard five weeks ago that Sanofi wanted to change the name of the inhaler, I thought they were referring to the "DreamBoat" and not the Cricket. I would suggest a naming contest, but with the French coming up with a name like Toujeo, who could possibly guess the name they'll use for the inhaler?
Although I have to admit that the name Caméléon has a certain ring to it, n'est pas?
|
|