|
Post by mango on May 28, 2017 18:01:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by uvula on May 28, 2017 19:08:48 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this. Blood glucose increased? Really? Blood glucose decreased? Is this a bad thing? 3 deaths? The percentage of cases seems like a weird metric. It doesn't include the total number of people using Afrezza. It just looks at the number of case reports.
Maybe we can take up a collection to come up with the $60 needed for the detailed report.
|
|
|
Post by boytroy88 on May 28, 2017 19:40:11 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this. Blood glucose increased? Really? Blood glucose decreased? Is this a bad thing? 3 deaths? The percentage of cases seems like a weird metric. It doesn't include the total number of people using Afrezza. It just looks at the number of case reports. Maybe we can take up a collection to come up with the $60 needed for the detailed report. NM
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on May 28, 2017 19:42:20 GMT -5
uvula I suggest that you read the footnotes. The FDA states that death may be an "outcome" (patients die of diabetes all the time, unfortunately with this disease) that sometimes are erroneously recorded as an "event". The deaths may not be directly attributed to a patient's use of Afrezza.
|
|
|
Post by boytroy88 on May 28, 2017 19:43:20 GMT -5
I suggest that you read the footnotes. The FDA states that death Is often an "outcome" (patients die of diabetes all the time, unfortunately with this disease) but deaths may sometimes be erroneously recorded as an "event". These deaths can be outcomes that are not directly attributed to a patient's use of Afrezza. Yep...just noticed it and was in the process of "wiping" out my comment...
|
|
|
Post by mango on May 28, 2017 19:50:29 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this. Blood glucose increased? Really? Blood glucose decreased? Is this a bad thing? 3 deaths? The percentage of cases seems like a weird metric. It doesn't include the total number of people using Afrezza. It just looks at the number of case reports. Maybe we can take up a collection to come up with the $60 needed for the detailed report. If there is enough interest, I will request a detailed report. Personally, I think this holds its on weight. Some of these would have Afrezza listed as a Secondary Suspect or as a Concomitant. So not every Adverse Event necessarily has Afrezza listed as Primary Suspect. • For example, all of the adverse events associated with the word injection would obviously not have Afrezza listed as the Primary Suspect. • The three deaths are these: • I personally think there is nothing to worry about. Only 347 individual patient reports are associated with the use of Afrezza. I think all the black box warnings should be removed based off this data, but I do not know if the FDA has ever done that using solely this data, however, no case studies have been published post-approval about a patient developing bronchospasms or non-reversable FEV1s or developing lung cancer or amyloidosis specifically from Afrezza either. So...seems unbelievably safe. This is everything reported since approval. • More than likely there are other meds listed that contributed to the increased/decreased blood glucose. • Meanwhile... FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA confirms increased risk of leg and foot amputations with the diabetes medicine canagliflozin (Invokana, Invokamet, Invokamet XR)www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm557507.htm
|
|
|
Post by myocat on May 28, 2017 21:19:17 GMT -5
Thanks for shooting. I think those are established events recording during and after FDA approval. All developed and approved drugs would have a long laundry list of adverse events.
Did you Know skin rash associated with wearing the CGM is an adverse event?
|
|
|
Post by mango on May 28, 2017 21:56:26 GMT -5
Thanks for shooting. I think those are established events recording during and after FDA approval. All developed and approved drugs would have a long laundry list of adverse events. Did you Know skin rash associated with wearing the CGM is an adverse event? They are from January 1st, 2014—May 20th, 2017. Second pic in OP under FDA Received Date.
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on May 28, 2017 21:58:19 GMT -5
good stuff. Thank you Forresttrees
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on May 28, 2017 22:50:41 GMT -5
I am drooling because there is nothing like concrete data to help make a sound decision!
I would suggest we all contribute to get the detailed reports but not just for Afrezza. I would suggest we get detailed reports on...
1. Exubera (similar drug but failed for obvious reasons. Still good to know where they stood with results) 2. Another popular and widely used RAA 3. Afrezza
It would be nice to see where our percentage breakdowns are and how we compare to current widely used RAAs.
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on May 28, 2017 22:57:41 GMT -5
we saw some of that recently for other insulins boomboom. It's nasty.
|
|
|
Post by boomboom on May 29, 2017 0:54:59 GMT -5
Thanks brotherm1. Was the data presented as shown above? Is Afrezzas spread similar or different to the current RAAs?
|
|
|
Post by mango on May 29, 2017 18:32:49 GMT -5
Thanks brotherm1. Was the data presented as shown above? Is Afrezzas spread similar or different to the current RAAs? All the RAAs have a dangerous profile. Same with the first line T2D treatment, Metformin.
|
|