|
Post by akemp3000 on Aug 31, 2017 9:09:33 GMT -5
...to tell us what insiders know and we don't. They've already had a 24-hour head start. That should be enough!
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 31, 2017 9:17:21 GMT -5
announcements, announcements, announcements. A terrible way to die. a terrible fate to be talked to death, a terrible way to die.
$2.27 this should be good. a volume runaway.
|
|
|
Post by madog365 on Aug 31, 2017 9:20:18 GMT -5
What do they know? I am dying to find out - this is not some fluke run there is very serious volume.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 31, 2017 9:23:04 GMT -5
What do they know? I am dying to find out - this is not some fluke run there is very serious volume. inappropriately, the thought ran through the brain, perhaps we should call Deerfield. They pay for information like this. I am so inappropriate.
|
|
|
Post by madog365 on Aug 31, 2017 9:26:37 GMT -5
What do they know? I am dying to find out - this is not some fluke run there is very serious volume. inappropriately, the thought ran through the brain, perhaps we should call Deerfield. They pay for information like this. I am so inappropriate.
well at least you have identified at least in your mind who the 'they' is. I'm still not sure about that one.
|
|
|
Post by BD on Aug 31, 2017 9:34:16 GMT -5
I'm having a really hard time buying in to the "insiders buying" theory, because it's illegal and they'd be easily caught. The best-case scenario is some institutional exuberance (I hope it's not irrational).
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 31, 2017 9:37:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BD on Aug 31, 2017 9:42:02 GMT -5
OK, so are you implying this is something they've done before so they're probably at it again, or that since they've been caught they're less likely to do it again?
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Aug 31, 2017 9:48:34 GMT -5
No bad talk about Deerfield here please. We need them. Deerfield is our friend. Period.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 31, 2017 9:48:44 GMT -5
OK, so are you implying this is something they've done before so they're probably at it again, or that since they've been caught they're less likely to do it again? no. I am implying, they did it before, allegedly.
|
|
|
Post by jonny80s on Aug 31, 2017 9:56:31 GMT -5
We have seen many surges like this before.
The options were extremely cheap and the stocks volatility is extremely high/easily manipulated.
Any stock with this much short interest with the end/beginning in sight will have some wild fluctuations.
If there is no news by Monday this is just a case of options players playing the numbers.
|
|
|
Post by jonny80s on Aug 31, 2017 10:00:22 GMT -5
Heavy volume on the Jan $2.5/3 calls today.... maybe there is some hope.
|
|
|
Post by akemp3000 on Aug 31, 2017 10:00:44 GMT -5
We'll know this week whether or not there's insider information and buying. The proof will be if an announcement or possibly a big jump in scripts shows up. If not, this move could be due to exuberance.
|
|
|
Post by cjm18 on Aug 31, 2017 10:05:29 GMT -5
Management should raise cash now (dilute) while the iron is hot. Or maybe the broker doing the offering wanted this run up first before the offering. I suppose they make more money the larger the offering.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Aug 31, 2017 10:09:09 GMT -5
Management should raise cash now (dilute) while the iron is hot. Or maybe the broker doing the offering wanted this run up first before the offering. I suppose they make more money the larger the offering. I think share price is going higher. 4 dollars the analyst target and 6 dollars the wolfe wave target. this triangle worked. Wolfe waves are fast. that is why they are called wolfe waves. if it plays out, 6 would be a better price to raise cash.
|
|