|
|
Post by goyocafe on Jun 22, 2018 9:39:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joeypotsandpans on Jun 22, 2018 9:50:48 GMT -5
The Kendall effect, notice how they are emphasizing the delivery via lungs now and the benefits as opposed to the FUD that has been used, he is taking the correct perspective via the physiological aspects and technology of Afrezza and TI. |
|
|
|
Post by rayskum on Jun 22, 2018 10:00:44 GMT -5
I am sure they meant higher A1C “goals” in the statement below found on the site
“To achieve higher A1C, PPG control needs to be addressed.”
|
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Jun 22, 2018 10:10:00 GMT -5
I am sure they meant higher A1C “goals” in the statement below found on the site “To achieve higher A1C, PPG control needs to be addressed.” Or maybe “To achieve lower A1C...” |
|
|
|
Post by sellhighdrinklow on Jun 22, 2018 10:32:06 GMT -5
The website needs to be corrected, ASAP. Sheesh
|
|
|
|
Post by kc on Jun 22, 2018 11:25:12 GMT -5
The Kendall effect, notice how they are emphasizing the delivery via lungs now and the benefits as opposed to the FUD that has been used, he is taking the correct perspective via the physiological aspects and technology of Afrezza and TI. Talking directly to the Doctor's..... nice web site change
When your patients are not at glycemic target, choose Afrezza, the only available inhaled option that delivers a rapid insulin response
|
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Jun 22, 2018 13:55:30 GMT -5
I am sure they meant higher A1C “goals” in the statement below found on the site “To achieve higher A1C, PPG control needs to be addressed.” Or maybe “To achieve lower A1C...” How about "tighter"? That what I read on the site now, unless you were viewing a different section. |
|
|
|
Post by porkini on Jun 22, 2018 14:19:36 GMT -5
Or maybe “To achieve lower A1C...” How about "tighter"? That what I read on the site now, unless you were viewing a different section. It was on the front page. They edited it from "higher" to "tighter" - I figured they had to use specific wording on that one since it contained a footnote reference. |
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Jun 22, 2018 14:39:24 GMT -5
How about "tighter"? That what I read on the site now, unless you were viewing a different section. It was on the front page. They edited it from "higher" to "tighter" - I figured they had to use specific wording on that one since it contained a footnote reference. That's cool that they fixed it so fast. Maybe they read this thread? Or someone tweeted it.... |
|
