|
Post by peppy on Feb 12, 2019 9:59:11 GMT -5
well looky there, some volume came into MNKD shares. 234,772 shares. in 26 mins. the reason it is noteworthy is total realtime shares traded the last few trading days has been between 500,000 and 600,000 shares. a hold of 1.37, is a measured move to $1.47. It would be nice if price demand was strong enough to get there, commercials and all. www.nasdaq.com/symbol/mnkd/real-timeAdded 597,766 shares in 32 mins, $1.41 something is gong on. $1.44. 810,361 shares in 36 mins.
|
|
|
Post by Clement on Feb 12, 2019 10:01:42 GMT -5
crossed the 50 day MA
|
|
|
Post by sexychefski on Feb 12, 2019 10:01:50 GMT -5
Here we go, fingers crossed
|
|
|
Post by Clement on Feb 12, 2019 10:12:14 GMT -5
Stock price increasing with good volume usually implies "not a head fake".
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Feb 12, 2019 10:14:51 GMT -5
926,790 real time shares in 42 mins. $1.44. someone is covering. Through here, the downtrend line from the 3 dollar UTHR top , $1.50 the next hard resistance. the UTHR gap low.
|
|
|
Post by slugworth008 on Feb 12, 2019 10:19:01 GMT -5
Someone covering makes the most sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by novafett on Feb 12, 2019 10:31:24 GMT -5
Interesting.. wonder if something is up?
|
|
|
Post by bigchungus91354 on Feb 12, 2019 10:57:09 GMT -5
It really wants to break 1.45
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Feb 12, 2019 16:22:28 GMT -5
MNKD Nasdaq real time volume, 2,316,883 shares. MNKD Nasdaq summary volume, 4,275,927 shares. MNKD $1.45. + 0.12. +9.02% www.nasdaq.com/symbol/mnkd
Last summary volume for last week was 5.9 million. (This chart, the only pattern I can see.) Price needs to get through the downtrend lines. $1.66 closes the gap.
|
|
|
Post by seanismorris on Feb 12, 2019 16:40:25 GMT -5
Interesting.. wonder if something is up? It’s the super secret MannKind pipeline. The little guy/gal investors are the last to know...
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Feb 12, 2019 16:41:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by traderdennis on Feb 12, 2019 16:43:53 GMT -5
Someone covering makes the most sense to me. Too low volume for any covering other than some small retail shorts.
|
|
|
Post by prcgorman2 on Feb 13, 2019 6:59:06 GMT -5
Someone covering makes the most sense to me. Too low volume for any covering other than some small retail shorts. Makes sense. They’re the ones least able to endure quickly escalating losses so more skittish. And they can’t manipulate the price using large scale naked shorting and bid/ask widen spread or hide their purchases in dark pools like the MMs. Spoiler Alert: There is a scene towards the end of Molly’s Game where the judge throws out the government’s case saying there was more crime committed on Wall Street in the morning than in all of Molly’s career. I enjoyed that. It would have been even better if he had gone into detail why he said it.
|
|
|
Post by uvula on Feb 13, 2019 8:07:48 GMT -5
Too low volume for any covering other than some small retail shorts. Makes sense. They’re the ones least able to endure quickly escalating losses so more skittish. And they can’t manipulate the price using large scale naked shorting and bid/ask widen spread or hide their purchases in dark pools like the MMs. Spoiler Alert: There is a scene towards the end of Molly’s Game where the judge throws out the government’s case saying there was more crime committed on Wall Street in the morning than in all of Molly’s career. I enjoyed that. It would have been even better if he had gone into detail why he said it. This isn't how you do spoiler alerts. You're supposed to mention the name of the movie BEFORE you say "spoiler alert". It is difficult to stop reading in the middle of a sentence. Thank you for telling me about an interesting movie I never heard about. And thanks for spoiling it 2 seconds later
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Feb 13, 2019 8:12:41 GMT -5
Makes sense. They’re the ones least able to endure quickly escalating losses so more skittish. And they can’t manipulate the price using large scale naked shorting and bid/ask widen spread or hide their purchases in dark pools like the MMs. Spoiler Alert: There is a scene towards the end of Molly’s Game where the judge throws out the government’s case saying there was more crime committed on Wall Street in the morning than in all of Molly’s career. I enjoyed that. It would have been even better if he had gone into detail why he said it. This isn't how you do spoiler alerts. You're supposed to mention the name of the movie BEFORE you say "spoiler alert". It is difficult to stop reading in the middle of a sentence. Thank you for telling me about an interesting movie I never heard about. And thanks for spoiling it 2 seconds later It’s worth watching all the same. Fascinating story.
|
|