|
|
Post by brentie on Dec 11, 2018 12:13:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Clement on Dec 11, 2018 12:25:32 GMT -5
Many thanks, Brentie!
When shorts read this article, don't you think it will give those cats paws?
When they read the lists of catalysts, might they become catatonic?
|
|
|
|
Post by wsulylecoug on Dec 11, 2018 13:32:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Dec 11, 2018 14:28:48 GMT -5
I'm going to Vegas next week ... this report came out 2 weeks too early. Oh what to do??? Maybe people will take awhile to read the 36 page report. Kinda looks like peppy's charts all bundled together.  Is peppy really Zack |
|
|
|
Post by Clement on Dec 12, 2018 7:48:05 GMT -5
On Yahoo finance, this article is not only the latest news item for MNKD; it is the latest news item for UTHR.
|
|
|
|
Zacks
Dec 12, 2018 13:32:23 GMT -5
sky likes this
Post by awesomo on Dec 12, 2018 13:32:23 GMT -5
I saw the article pop up on my main page Yahoo feed, but that's mostly just because of how well Yahoo/Google knows me. Of course I stupidly checked the comments section and saw the usual mess of "OMG PAID REPORT, FAKE NEWS!!!!", "MNKD SUCKZZZ, GOING BANKRUPT!!!"
|
|
|
|
Post by mango on Dec 12, 2018 13:37:27 GMT -5
I'm going to Vegas next week ... this report came out 2 weeks too early. Oh what to do??? Maybe people will take awhile to read the 36 page report. Kinda looks like peppy's charts all bundled together. Is peppy really Zack Do you need someone to house sit your tent in Hawaii while you're gone? |
|
|
|
Zacks
Dec 12, 2018 16:00:34 GMT -5
Post by mnkdfann on Dec 12, 2018 16:00:34 GMT -5
I saw the article pop up on my main page Yahoo feed, but that's mostly just because of how well Yahoo/Google knows me. Of course I stupidly checked the comments section and saw the usual mess of "OMG PAID REPORT, FAKE NEWS!!!!", "MNKD SUCKZZZ, GOING BANKRUPT!!!" The report is NOT fake news, but according to the disclosures it WAS paid for my Mannkind or its agent: "Zacks SCR has received compensation from the issuer directly or from an investor relations consulting firm engaged by the issuer for providing non-investment banking services to this issuer and expects to receive additional compensation for such non-investment banking services provided to this issuer. The non-investment banking services provided to the issuer includes the preparation of this report, investor relations services, investment software, financial database analysis, organization of non-deal road shows, and attendance fees for conferences sponsored or co-sponsored by Zacks SCR. The fees for these services vary on a per-client basis and are subject to the number and types of services contracted. Fees typically range between ten thousand and fifty thousand dollars per annum. Details of fees paid by this issuer are available upon request." While some might view that as discouraging, the optimist may take it as encouraging in the sense this may indicate that Mannkind is very interested in actively protecting its share price, and may use other promotional tools of the trade to get the share price high enough and soon enough for the outstanding warrants to be exercised. |
|
|
|
Post by mannmade on Dec 12, 2018 16:14:53 GMT -5
While mnkd May have sponsored the article (it was articulate and flowed very logically) they don’t pay for upgrades as far as I know. So zacks upgrades and supports with a very well reasoned article published by mnkd. Good by me!
|
|
|
|
Zacks
Dec 12, 2018 16:29:07 GMT -5
Post by mnkdfann on Dec 12, 2018 16:29:07 GMT -5
While mnkd May have sponsored the article (it was articulate and flowed very logically) they don’t pay for upgrades as far as I know. So zacks upgrades and supports with a very well reasoned article published by mnkd. Good by me! Zacks SCR "initiated" coverage (which I guess just means publishing the article in this case). It didn't upgrade an existing price target. |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Dec 12, 2018 17:00:19 GMT -5
How, exactly, does one upgrade when one initiates coverage? LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Dec 12, 2018 17:11:16 GMT -5
Even if they paid for it, it is a quality report, it's not a pump and dump fabrication. I'm good with it.
|
|
|
|
Zacks
Dec 12, 2018 17:38:30 GMT -5
Post by mnkdfann on Dec 12, 2018 17:38:30 GMT -5
How, exactly, does one upgrade when one initiates coverage? LOL Of course they couldn't, that was my point (and was in response to someone who described it as an upgrade). It was an initiation of coverage, not an upgrade. |
|
|
|
Post by porkini on Dec 13, 2018 10:59:10 GMT -5
While mnkd May have sponsored the article (it was articulate and flowed very logically) they don’t pay for upgrades as far as I know. So zacks upgrades and supports with a very well reasoned article published by mnkd. Good by me! Zacks SCR "initiated" coverage (which I guess just means publishing the article in this case). It didn't upgrade an existing price target. I'm guessing that MNKD did not instruct Zacks SCR how to write the report and how to come up with a value. Zacks SCR is, after all, putting the article out there with their name on it and whatever reputation they have on the line... Source: s1.q4cdn.com/460208960/files/News/2018/Zacks_SCR_Research_12102018_MNKD_Marckx.pdf |
|
|
|
Zacks
Dec 13, 2018 12:05:23 GMT -5
Post by mnkdfann on Dec 13, 2018 12:05:23 GMT -5
Zacks SCR "initiated" coverage (which I guess just means publishing the article in this case). It didn't upgrade an existing price target. I'm guessing that MNKD did not instruct Zacks SCR how to write the report and how to come up with a value. Zacks SCR is, after all, putting the article out there with their name on it and whatever reputation they have on the line... I don't disagree, and FWIW I never claimed MNKD told Zacks SCR what to write, or that they did not stand behind their price target. |
|
Is peppy really Zack 
