|
Post by itellthefuture777 on Jun 14, 2020 21:30:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rfogel on Jun 15, 2020 14:23:28 GMT -5
If I were diabetic, I don't know that I would find that conclusion -- "persistent significant decline in FEV1 during the use of TI was uncommon" -- very reassuring. The study also doesn't specify the doses so there's no way of knowing whether higher doses may have contributed to the FEV changes.
|
|
|
Post by bill on Jun 15, 2020 15:46:11 GMT -5
If I were diabetic, I don't know that I would find that conclusion -- "persistent significant decline in FEV1 during the use of TI was uncommon" -- very reassuring. The study also doesn't specify the doses so there's no way of knowing whether higher doses may have contributed to the FEV changes. Gotta love the way people write in ways that confuse and obfuscate. They could have said something like "it was uncommon to see any persistent significant decline in FEV during use of TI." Of course, it begs the question of why "persistent" and "significant" were even important, i.e., what did the data show that made this observation report worthy.
|
|