|
|
Post by jkendra on Feb 1, 2023 10:18:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cedafuntennis on Feb 1, 2023 11:40:32 GMT -5
Good dig but I hope it's not a matter that Motley was wrong then and they will be wrong now. At least with Mannkind, the reality is right in front of us and they proof of execution is here.
|
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Feb 1, 2023 12:22:51 GMT -5
Motley Fool is barely a step above Seeking Alpha, most of their articles are click bait that don't really say anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by phdedieu12 on Feb 1, 2023 14:14:04 GMT -5
Seems pretty spot on to me. They were right then, the company was on the brink then and to suggest it might not live to see 2020 was very accurate. I don't think any of us disagree that the company is most certainly worth a second look
|
|
|
|
Post by RainbowUnicorn on Feb 1, 2023 15:24:07 GMT -5
Seems pretty spot on to me. They were right then, the company was on the brink then and to suggest it might not live to see 2020 was very accurate. I don't think any of us disagree that the company is most certainly worth a second look Agree, it's all about context. |
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Feb 1, 2023 17:13:58 GMT -5
Motley Fool is barely a step above Seeking Alpha, most of their articles are click bait that don't really say anything. This is correct. The barrier to be a "contributor" for MF is pretty low (MF subscription services are better quality). They were click-baiting with their doom and gloom "might go out of business" bs hype years ago, and this one is also click bait though I'd rather see it on the positive side because some people actually give credence to their stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by cedafuntennis on Feb 1, 2023 19:07:01 GMT -5
I was only taking issue with their initial contention that none of those have a good chance of survival. Two if the three made it. No issue with the second part as MNKD certainly is not the company it once was and it is certainly in far better position for a 2nd, 3rd and n-th look.
|
|
