|
|
Post by liane on Nov 14, 2013 11:48:45 GMT -5
Anyone else listening? Matt seems to be cramming a lot of info into a short amount of time. Hitting all the major concerns. Will have to replay it later to catch everything.
|
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Nov 14, 2013 12:06:22 GMT -5
Those conferences can be tough, sometimes one needs to power read through a lot of material in the 20 minutes or so they typically give you. Fortunately, many of those in attendance know what to listen for, but it certainly not a great way to educate the uneducated or to win an oratory award.
|
|
|
|
Post by savzak on Nov 14, 2013 12:17:35 GMT -5
I caught most of it. It's clear that a partnership is not going to occur within the next few days unless he was intentionally being coy. I don't know why he mentioned the possibility of a panel. That was part of the call I missed some of. I thought the general consesus was that there will be no need for a panel. Why did it come up at all? If I heard him correctly, he said he can understand why a partner would not want to sign until it was determined that there would be no panel review or such a reveiw was completed. That doesn't sound like a guy who expects a partnership real soon. Accordingly, on the partnership front, I'm disappointed in his comments. I thought the rest was solid.
|
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 14, 2013 12:28:45 GMT -5
As to the Adcom, various nefarious types keep suggesting that a panel will be necessary (in order to cast doubt on the whole process). None was needed for the previous 2 NDAs. And while the FDA could always surprise us and decide to go that route, I think the odds are extremely low. These are more for general safety issues. I think Matt was simply trying to acknowledge that this has been brought up so it doesn't appear management is hiding anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Nov 14, 2013 18:58:43 GMT -5
As to the Adcom, various nefarious types keep suggesting that a panel will be necessary (in order to cast doubt on the whole process). None was needed for the previous 2 NDAs. And while the FDA could always surprise us and decide to go that route, I think the odds are extremely low. These are more for general safety issues. I think Matt was simply trying to acknowledge that this has been brought up so it doesn't appear management is hiding anything. Just listened to the conf call and I was thinking the same thing too. Just the shorts making more FUD about a panel being a potential obstacle. |
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Nov 14, 2013 19:08:08 GMT -5
Funny he mentions about the amount of time people had to check their glucose levels in the trials and also update their journals, noting how can someone go through all of this and not quit the trials midstream. I remember Afrezzauser mentioning about how much a pain in the xxx this was when he was hearing his PDA beep all the time for him to update his data points. Another win for Afreszzuser!! LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Nov 14, 2013 19:09:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by spiro on Nov 14, 2013 20:31:55 GMT -5
Savzak,
It's nice to see that you have decided to join this message board. I am pretty sure that your opinions and comments will be respected and appreciated here. I also think that you don't have to worry about your personal registration information being outed by the Administrator. I think that there are a lot of good people posting here on this board. I am probably the craziest guy they let post here. Heck, just look at my picture. i am looking forward to reading your future posts.
Spiro
|
|
|
|
Post by savzak on Nov 14, 2013 22:02:21 GMT -5
Thanks Spiro. I just couldn't get over what a cowardly thing that was to do. On the other hand, it's no real surprise. We all know that there is a certain percentage of society that lacks integrity, character, even self respect. There's no reason to expect them all to stay away from an annonymous message board where they are free to act out as they please under the protection of a secret identity (or in his case, multiple identities). You'll probably see me here more often but I'll use Yahoo too. Take care.
|
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 15, 2013 6:10:23 GMT -5
savzak -
Great to see you here. I use the same strategy - I keep track of YMB, but only rarely post there. Someone there uniformly gives me a thumbs down even when I'm stating facts and not opinion. Very childish. Just wondering - who's your Avatar?
|
|
|
|
Post by savzak on Nov 15, 2013 6:24:48 GMT -5
liane, my avitar is Bastiat. He was a 19th Century French economist and was a dedicated advocate of economic liberty. His writings are both very coherent and prolific. In short, he was a terrific ambassador for liberty, particularly laissez faire capitalism.
|
|
