Post by babaoriley on Feb 27, 2014 14:35:47 GMT -5
Okay, I’m throwing this out for the consideration of those of you who do trade options. I've been trying to figure how to get some defensive leverage, as just buying puts is too expensive. I will tell you, even if we get hammered by the Advisory Committee and the FDA, this strategy is not guaranteed to rescue you, but here goes.
I’ve done one basic thing, a bear put calendar spread, but done it with a couple of things in mind, so actually have entered into two distinct trades.
Trade 1: I bought May 17th, $8 strike puts, and sold an equal number of April 4th, $8 strike puts. The difference in price was about .39 (May, of course, selling for more than April), so, let’s use round numbers, so for 100 contracts of each, the net price to me was about $4,000. Here’s the general thinking: suppose that on April 1st, AdCom is moderately to very favorable, I could easily see the April 4th $8 strike puts expiring worthless or close to it (stock price gets close to or above $8). If that’s the case, I now hold 100 May 17th $8 strike put contracts (for which I'm out $4,000 plus whatever it may cost to close out the April 4th $8 puts), which places me in a position to salvage money if the FDA does us in. I purposely did not do purchase the April 19th puts (although that would have cut the net price to about .20), because I can easily see the FDA putting off the decision for a week or two, which could annihilate that strategy, but surely (or so the theory goes) they will love us or hate us by May 17th.
So, if the FDA kills us, and we go down to, say around $2, I would have a $60,000 or so profit on my 100 put contracts.
Of course, if AdCom is nasty to us on April 1, the stock will likely drop and this strategy doesn’t work all that well, because I will have to sell a bunch of my May 17th puts, in order to cover the April 4th puts on which I am obligated. I may break close to even in that scenario, or lose an acceptable amount. But we will all be devastated from the poor AdCom result, and have to rely on a Hail Mary from the FDA.
The above transaction is obviously a big loser if the FDA approves and the stock goes up above $8 and stays there – that would be okay with me!!!!!!
Trade 2 will be discussed in a separate post.
If anyone can see why the above is stupid as a defensive strategy only, please, please let me know!!!
I’ve done one basic thing, a bear put calendar spread, but done it with a couple of things in mind, so actually have entered into two distinct trades.
Trade 1: I bought May 17th, $8 strike puts, and sold an equal number of April 4th, $8 strike puts. The difference in price was about .39 (May, of course, selling for more than April), so, let’s use round numbers, so for 100 contracts of each, the net price to me was about $4,000. Here’s the general thinking: suppose that on April 1st, AdCom is moderately to very favorable, I could easily see the April 4th $8 strike puts expiring worthless or close to it (stock price gets close to or above $8). If that’s the case, I now hold 100 May 17th $8 strike put contracts (for which I'm out $4,000 plus whatever it may cost to close out the April 4th $8 puts), which places me in a position to salvage money if the FDA does us in. I purposely did not do purchase the April 19th puts (although that would have cut the net price to about .20), because I can easily see the FDA putting off the decision for a week or two, which could annihilate that strategy, but surely (or so the theory goes) they will love us or hate us by May 17th.
So, if the FDA kills us, and we go down to, say around $2, I would have a $60,000 or so profit on my 100 put contracts.
Of course, if AdCom is nasty to us on April 1, the stock will likely drop and this strategy doesn’t work all that well, because I will have to sell a bunch of my May 17th puts, in order to cover the April 4th puts on which I am obligated. I may break close to even in that scenario, or lose an acceptable amount. But we will all be devastated from the poor AdCom result, and have to rely on a Hail Mary from the FDA.
The above transaction is obviously a big loser if the FDA approves and the stock goes up above $8 and stays there – that would be okay with me!!!!!!
Trade 2 will be discussed in a separate post.
If anyone can see why the above is stupid as a defensive strategy only, please, please let me know!!!