|
Post by mnkdmorelong on Jan 6, 2016 21:01:45 GMT -5
There are many on this Board who know the sales numbers quite well. I need your help.
What is underway now at MNKD is number crunching. Maybe we can peek into their world.
The follow scenario is predicated on MNKD going alone in marketing Afrezza. If a partner was found, they would share the profits and generally make it more difficult for MNKD to attain cash flow neutrality.
The current run rate of Afrezza sales is about $20 mln/yr. MNKD's loss for year 1 (9 months) was about $15 mln; implying a full year total loss of $57 mln for the enterprise. This loss included large training costs, typical RA costs, very little DTC, and nothing for the long term safety study. If MNKD lowers Afrezza prices by half, naturally losses would be greater if sales do not rise materially above $20 mln/yr. How much would sales have to rise for Afrezza to be cash flow positive? It seems to me that sales need to be $150 mln to make Afrezza work with lower prices.
We must then bring in Corporate MNKD who is burning cash at $60-80 mln per year. What would Afrezza sales have to be to cover these expenses also? My estimate is $300 mln/yr.
Is $300 mln/yr Afrezza sales possible? A year ago, this was a $1 bln/yr opportunity so the answer is yes.
The final and biggest question is how long will it take to ramp up to $300 mln/yr and now much cash does MNKD need to get to that point?
My guess is 3 years and $200 mln.
What are your guesses?
|
|
|
Post by ricguy on Jan 6, 2016 21:06:44 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2016 21:11:37 GMT -5
Thats the author's interpretation of Matt's statement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2016 21:14:31 GMT -5
I came across the article about Hakan right before Thanksgving after reading the link you posted. Short-sellers frenzy: MannKind has faced intense pressure from short sellers, investors who are betting that the company's stock will fall. "It certainly is very frustrating," Edstrom said. "There's so much being written on the message boards. It's not reflecting the true situation, and you suspect it's being written because it can benefit them. There's not much we can do about that.... We are very much aware that you can have a conversation with the SEC and they can find a reason to look into it. I cannot talk about it because of confidentiality reasons." This really makes me wonder if they had no idea SNY was dropping them
|
|
|
Post by ricguy on Jan 6, 2016 22:16:25 GMT -5
Thats the author's interpretation of Matt's statement. Your correct thanks for clearing that up. I went back and re-listened to the conference call.
|
|