|
|
Post by mannmade on Mar 10, 2014 11:57:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Mar 10, 2014 12:56:21 GMT -5
Always nice to have good ole Georgie hit the shorts in the ...
|
|
|
|
Post by mannmade on Mar 10, 2014 13:29:45 GMT -5
Yes it is... but he seems to be losing his super powers if today is any indication... LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by liane on Mar 10, 2014 13:39:39 GMT -5
I deleted the duplicate posting of this in "Calendar of Events"
liane
|
|
|
|
Post by spiro on Mar 10, 2014 14:09:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ashiwi on Mar 10, 2014 15:14:36 GMT -5
Also from MNKD website. 13 indications where Technosphere technology can be utilized. www.mannkindtechnologies.com/Capabilities.aspxMannKind’s Capabilities MannKind Corporation specializes in innovative technologies that enable pulmonary delivery of medicine. Dry powder, device and advanced development technologies are uniquely integrated at MannKind to enable real world translational medicine. We strive to get medicinal concepts rapidly progressed into sensible, patient-friendly treatment solutions. Inhaled drug delivery provides many benefits, including: Rapid onset of action Avoidance of first pass metabolism Needle-free administration for systemic or local drug effect These are important differentiators within the growing market of self-administered medicines. Application for our MannKind technologies exists in many areas, and we are seeking collaborative interest from the medical industry to create new opportunities for treatment of: Pain Migraine Anti-nausea Anti-obesity Osteoporosis GI disorder Pulmonary arterial hypertension Diabetes Immunosuppression Vaccination Respiratory disorder Adjuvant therapy Reconstituted powders |
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Mar 10, 2014 16:01:07 GMT -5
Yup, the shorts have lots to worry about, all right. Putting aside all that technical stuff, what I'm most hoping is that they are worried about the share price!!! I've gotta think there's a market in Colorado and Washington for administration of cannabis (no smoke or heat to the lungs!).
Well, we fought back to no change today; it's going to be a tough war over the remainder of March - I hope you guys are all up for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by alcc on Mar 10, 2014 16:55:46 GMT -5
What happens in March makes no difference whatsoever, unless you've been waiting for the back up the truck moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Mar 11, 2014 0:32:53 GMT -5
What happens in March makes a big difference to me, cuz I plan to HEDGE before the AdCom; I want to back up the truck and unload some shares at a higher price than today. Can I be any more honest about things?
|
|
|
|
Post by spiro on Mar 11, 2014 9:24:42 GMT -5
Kathleen's response to George Rho. I could never win an argument with her.
Kathleen74
Comment (1)
Dear George,
Thanks for your clear, balanced assessment of what lies ahead with respect to Mannkind. I always enjoy reading your articles. As you may have guessed, I am the Kathleen referred to in your piece. Thanks for your kind words. Readers should be aware that yesterday (Sunday) Feuerstein blocked me from posting on his blog what were intended to be my final comments regarding his piece on Mannkind. Here is what I attempted to post (several times) as a response to his last exchange with me:
"Adam, I am not going to engage in a silly tit for tat here. You miss the point of my response to your article which was to separate out the fact that you provided from the negative conjecture and innuendo - and what I perceived to be blatant attempts to mislead the reader. I'll post after PDUFA - either to put together a case for why Afrezza has huge market potential - that is where my background and experience (emphasis on the latter) will be put to good use, or to admit that I was wrong in my expectation that Afrezza had a good chance to be approved. I have no illusions here. I realize that I could lose the bulk of my investment in Mannkind if it suffers another FDA rejection, but I have not yet seen a cogent bear case that holds water. I truly would love to see one. I don't want to lose money that I don't have to - I have more in this speculative play than I would have normally put into one, but I believe it is worth the risk."
George, thanks for the opportunity to post my comments intended for Feuerstein here - and thanks for your insightful ongoing commentary regarding Mannkind.
10 Mar, 03:07 PMReply! Report AbuseLike21
George Rho , Contributor
Comments (395)
Author’s reply » Hi Kathleen74,
Thank you for your kind words. Thank you also for the comments you posted on AF's article, I thoroughly enjoyed the back and forth between you two, even though I don't normally appreciate mismatches. I almost felt bad for Adam.
Any thoughts about taking the baton and writing the next article on MNKD?
|
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Mar 11, 2014 9:52:15 GMT -5
Thanks for posting, Spiro, Kathleen is, indeed, a very clear thinker! But don't sell yourself short in an argument, my friend, I'm confident that there are several topics where you'd clean her clock!
|
|
|
|
Post by spiro on Mar 11, 2014 10:12:56 GMT -5
Babaoriley, OK, maybe on golf and Miami Heat basketball, but definitely not kayaking.
|
|
