|
Post by LosingMyBullishness on Feb 11, 2016 3:59:08 GMT -5
Relative trend comparision using google trends: Blue: Afrezza Red: Toujeo Yellow: Tresiba Time intervall: 12 month Region: U.S. Categories: All The volume is too small to verify a shift from NY and CA to a broader regional interest, but a comparision of 12m vs 7d gives some indication. My take-aways: - Huge marketing budgets work, social media for afrezza had no effect yet. - Afrezza searches are mainly by investors or early adopters, Toujeo searches are by doctors and patients. Indication based on kind of search Toujeo leads significantly for web searches. Afrezza is basically alone when filtering by News searches
Sadly embedding the script that links directly to google trend does not work here so Link to comparision at google trendsSome other inside I found remarkable: - On a world-wide comparision there have been no significant searches from other countries beside U.S. --> There is basically no awareness beyond the U.S.
|
|
|
Post by benyiju on Feb 11, 2016 6:27:10 GMT -5
Well, that sucks.
|
|
|
Post by LosingMyBullishness on Feb 11, 2016 7:01:08 GMT -5
True. At least we have a (declining) baseline to evaluate the success of future marketing against. You can see (when you filter Feb 2015 to Feb 16) the increase of awareness of Toujeo marketing against Afrezza. For me another proof of SNY's lack of marketing effort: They did not create awareness in the first place: it was not just not subscribed due to spiro issues, price, insurance etc., but it was not googled.
|
|
|
Post by esstan2001 on Feb 11, 2016 9:15:09 GMT -5
I would think that in making his case for a partner or more $, Matt will need 10 presentation slides highlighting all the objective, clear evidence that Sanofi did not market Afrezza. The deck needs to include these google trends results, excerpts of the Amy T ADA report, the Dance CEO comments, and any other similar published article comments. A review of this board would make an excellent starting point.
|
|
|
Post by esstan2001 on Feb 11, 2016 9:34:02 GMT -5
I would think that in making his case for a partner or more $, Matt will need 10 presentation slides highlighting all the objective, clear evidence that Sanofi did not market Afrezza. The deck needs to include these google trends results, excerpts of the Amy T ADA report, the Dance CEO comments, and any other similar published article comments. A review of this board would make an excellent starting point. And I am sure there are professional research outfits that can provide ad metrics for Matt to cite also; just requires some $...
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Feb 11, 2016 9:37:43 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 10:21:23 GMT -5
I would think that in making his case for a partner or more $, Matt will need 10 presentation slides highlighting all the objective, clear evidence that Sanofi did not market Afrezza. The deck needs to include these google trends results, excerpts of the Amy T ADA report, the Dance CEO comments, and any other similar published article comments. A review of this board would make an excellent starting point. I feel like any big pharma will know what the deal was. Its not secreacy to these guys. If certain funds had access to knowing Afrezza was going to be back burnered I think big pharma has to know also.
|
|
|
Post by symbil on Feb 11, 2016 10:50:16 GMT -5
|
|