|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Oct 20, 2016 11:52:33 GMT -5
Percentage wise, we have a nice move up today. It's good to see for a change.
|
|
|
|
Post by cgiscgis on Oct 20, 2016 11:56:38 GMT -5
I am scared! Matt, what have you done! ?
|
|
|
|
Post by orlon on Oct 20, 2016 12:05:26 GMT -5
Not to worry...going back down.
|
|
|
|
Post by MnkdWASmyRtrmntPlan on Oct 20, 2016 12:12:42 GMT -5
Yeah, started at about noon. Shot from .48 to .53 in heavier volume in the 12:00 hour, but back downward a little and settling at .52 now. I wonder what was the catalyst.
|
|
|
|
Post by mockingjay on Oct 20, 2016 12:20:10 GMT -5
a good run for awhile
|
|
|
|
Post by akemp3000 on Oct 20, 2016 12:22:48 GMT -5
While the catalyst for today's move isn't known, it would be nice to find out it precedes a nice move up in tomorrow's scripts. There will always be those who know in advance.
|
|
|
|
Post by MnkdWASmyRtrmntPlan on Oct 20, 2016 12:29:48 GMT -5
Ah, yes, that would be nice. I have googled for mannkind news for the past couple/few hours and came up empty.
|
|
|
|
Post by saxcmann on Oct 20, 2016 12:32:28 GMT -5
While the catalyst for today's move isn't known, it would be nice to find out it precedes a nice move up in tomorrow's scripts. There will always be those who know in advance. If one week delay you bet they'll know in advance. Maybe options in play? |
|
|
|
Post by mnkdnewb on Oct 20, 2016 12:32:52 GMT -5
Technical move today. RSI was at 19 for a couple days. Called it a few days ago  |
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Oct 20, 2016 12:37:06 GMT -5
Yeah, started at about noon. Shot from .48 to .53 in heavier volume in the 12:00 hour, but back downward a little and settling at .52 now. I wonder what was the catalyst. Fluctuations in the Force representing eddies in the struggle between light and dark. That's my technical analysis and I'm sticking with it. |
|
|
|
Post by victoria on Oct 20, 2016 12:48:30 GMT -5
The stock has moved up 13% this week so far. Worth noting. My LEAP options have not however followed suit as yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by factspls88 on Oct 20, 2016 12:50:30 GMT -5
I believe it was due to this tweet by Mike Castagna (@castagna2011) last night: @_chuck956 smwill77 chuck criticize me all you want, but one day you will thank me. In the meantime thank you for your support of Afrezza. (Sorry - I don't know how to post a shot of the tweet here.) It's also on $MNKD on stock twits and in the blog section of this site. |
|
|
|
Post by victoria on Oct 20, 2016 13:00:49 GMT -5
Still rising: I'm going with advanced info re script figures being the cause. Lets see.
|
|
|
|
Post by factspls88 on Oct 20, 2016 13:06:39 GMT -5
Still rising: I'm going with advanced info re script figures being the cause. Lets see. No reason why we can't have both. Approval of label changes would also be really nice  . And improved positioning in payor formularies would also be a big win. None are out of the realm of possibiity imho. |
|
|
|
Post by mockingjay on Oct 20, 2016 13:17:58 GMT -5
I believe it was due to this tweet by Mike Castagna (@castagna2011) last night: @_chuck956 smwill77 chuck criticize me all you want, but one day you will thank me. In the meantime thank you for your support of Afrezza. (Sorry - I don't know how to post a shot of the tweet here.) It's also on $MNKD on stock twits and in the blog section of this site. I think the Fox5 tv news |
|
. And improved positioning in payor formularies would also be a big win. None are out of the realm of possibiity imho.