Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2016 22:09:00 GMT -5
Matt does and if so when must the trust alert the market of a sale of shares. Is the trust the same as any investor owning 5%. Is it possible the fund has sold shares?
|
|
|
|
Post by rockstarrick on Oct 28, 2016 22:13:10 GMT -5
I personally think all this BK talk is a bunch of crap, I don't care what your reasoning is, I have my own reasons to believe otherwise. Nobody here knows when the scripts may gap up, (as Derek said). If I believed as some of the people on this forum, I would sell and move on !! Not saying I'm right, but I'm just as right as all the doomsday posters because due to the silence, nobody knows for sure. So you guys go ahead and stress about BK, I'll be hunting with my grandson while I wait for the scripts to increase. Time will tell who's right.
No disrespect to any of you, you are all seasoned investors, I respect every single one of you, I just don't agree with you.
I hope everybody has a great weekend !!
Remember, I'll get the lights, and I'll do it with a smile on my face.
Good luck to all
Rock
|
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Oct 28, 2016 22:35:57 GMT -5
I am also of a mind that BK is not going to happen, but that doesn't mean the alternative is going to be much better for retail investors. I expect someone to make a bid to buy the company out for a very, very cheap price.
|
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Oct 28, 2016 23:07:09 GMT -5
A company isn't going to sell cheap just because they might go BK. They can easily take the assets down with the ship. .. why would an acquiring company want to risk the chance on missing out on Afrezza and techno by nickel and diming. ... i don't think a b/o is in the works but even at 44 cents.. i don't think this company gets sold for less than 3 billion.. or about $6 bucks whenever that happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Oct 28, 2016 23:23:16 GMT -5
A company isn't going to sell cheap just because they might go BK. They can easily take the assets down with the ship. .. why would an acquiring company want to risk the chance on missing out on Afrezza and techno by nickel and diming. ... I've seen it happen before is all I can say. |
|
|
|
Post by nylefty on Oct 29, 2016 0:25:04 GMT -5
A company isn't going to sell cheap just because they might go BK. They can easily take the assets down with the ship. .. why would an acquiring company want to risk the chance on missing out on Afrezza and techno by nickel and diming. ... i don't think a b/o is in the works but even at 44 cents.. i don't think this company gets sold for less than 3 billion.. or about $6 bucks whenever that happens. Six bucks sounds good to me...I'd more than double my investment. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2016 0:30:46 GMT -5
I mean this the nicest way possible but there is something really wrong with your thought process if you think anyone is paying 3 billion for mnkd.
|
|
|
|
Post by nylefty on Oct 29, 2016 0:49:14 GMT -5
I mean this the nicest way possible but there is something really wrong with your thought process if you think anyone is paying 3 billion for mnkd. Gotta love people who preface their insults with "I mean this the nicest way possible..." No, you don't. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2016 9:53:31 GMT -5
I mean this the nicest way possible but there is something really wrong with your thought process if you think anyone is paying 3 billion for mnkd. Gotta love people who preface their insults with "I mean this the nicest way possible..." No, you don't. You are out of your mind if you think anyone is paying $6 a share. Better? |
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Oct 29, 2016 10:00:41 GMT -5
I'd be happy with $ 2/share  |
|
|
|
Post by promann on Oct 30, 2016 5:44:24 GMT -5
All I ever see on this Board is talk of Bankruptcy! Are you all holding a short position here because you are really frightening me and other true longs into thinking of selling our position.. IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT  . I believe Mannkind will survive and BK is IMO not in Matt P or Mike C or any executive's at Mannkinds Plan. I believe they still are moving forward and will live Al's dream. CMon people lets be a little more positive here!! I'm not trying to pump this I'm just Saying this is far from over.. Stay Tuned!! Are you for real man? Mike and Matt might very be doing there best but at what point do you realize things are nearing an end. Have you seen the script numbers. How does a company survive if they can't sell there only product? The whole company is based on afrezza and they can't figure out how to sell it. Also why is it every time someone says something realistic they are automatically a short. Grow up guy. What is your problem? I think Nimrod says it all ! I know I don't deserve to be insulted! I also know that telling me to grow up is very insulting considering I just started my retirement. Your beginning quote (Are you for real man) is also uncalled for. |
|
|
|
Post by gtay87 on Oct 30, 2016 9:19:27 GMT -5
Getting back on topic, as I read the 10-Q, Mannkind has pledged all of its assets to its debt holders. The best the family and foundation could do is retain whatever is left after the 225 plus million dollars in debt is paid off.
|
|
|
|
Post by nylefty on Oct 30, 2016 9:19:32 GMT -5
Gotta love people who preface their insults with "I mean this the nicest way possible..." No, you don't. You are out of your mind if you think anyone is paying $6 a share. Better? No, it's not. I never said I thought anyone would pay that much...was just objecting to your insulting someone who raised the possibility. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2016 11:10:52 GMT -5
You are out of your mind if you think anyone is paying $6 a share. Better? No, it's not. I never said I thought anyone would pay that much...was just objecting to your insulting someone who raised the possibility. Its an insult to not comment on such an absurd buyout price. Its an insult to not respond and have some other board member think there is any logical reasoning behind $6 a share. If you know its not possible why throw gas on the fire with how much your investment would be worth? |
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Oct 30, 2016 11:44:49 GMT -5
No, it's not. I never said I thought anyone would pay that much...was just objecting to your insulting someone who raised the possibility. Its an insult to not comment on such an absurd buyout price. Its an insult to not respond and have some other board member think there is any logical reasoning behind $6 a share. If you know its not possible why throw gas on the fire with how much your investment would be worth? Not saying it is going to happen. Saying this did happen. Remember? 1 dollar to 5.25 was it when it happened? Nortel. Bankruptcy. Patent. Bidding war. Took the stock price up. What was the final bids for the patents. Was it three corporate enterprise bought patents?
Note: THE TIME FRAME> 2006
|
|
