|
|
Post by nemzter on Nov 1, 2016 9:33:54 GMT -5
Someone needs to lock this thread up, the pumping is strong with this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by promann on Nov 1, 2016 9:50:03 GMT -5
Someone needs to lock this thread up, the pumping is strong with this one. Hurry hurry get your shares before they are gone lol |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 1, 2016 10:51:19 GMT -5
Not to be rude, but must you always piss on people's hopes? I happen to think that Epinephrine is a hot item in the market right now. I don't think you realize the impact you might have on investors. You are a sharp guy, and a moderator of this board. One might assume you know more than the average investor. You have alluded to being friends with Matt P. Now if you mix this all in with some of your claims its IMO a recipe for disaster. If you keep striking out on your predictions you have to expect people to criticize future ideas. (Sigh) It's amazing how things get put out of context around here.
First, I posted last year that I've had friendly emails/chats with former CFO Matt Pfeffer and that I consider him a friend in a business sense, not personal. I made that quite clear. Matt has never, nor would he ever, provided me with insider information. Every investor has the ability to pick up a phone, pen a letter, or send an email to the Investor Relations department. Getting a response doesn't make one an insider. So you can put that idea out of your mind.
Second, if I know "more than the average investor" than I suppose it may be because I research more than the average investor. When I post my discoveries, I nearly always include my source(s). I post this information so that others may benefit from my DD, just as I benefit from the work done by many others at ProBoards. You will not find a single post from me where I tell people to buy or sell. If you assume that my posting good information is a signal to buy, then you presume too much.
Third, it's amusing (to a degree) how often others will take any number of my posts and turn them into another "MnHoldem's prediction". An observation is not a prediction. Listing the possibilities, even ranking them into probabilities is not making a prediction. I often explain a number of possible scenarios on a given topic. Does that mean I'm predicting that any one of them is likely to happen? One good example is matt , who many think to be a biotech-savvy poster who often lays out multiple scenarios to help clarify an issue. Should we interpret his educational posts to mean that he is predicting any of those scenarios is what will happen? Nope. There are some members on ProBoards who will use that "prediction" label in a manner that, when used to mock, seems to be an attempt to discredit or to silence posters who share positive (or negative) viewpoints. That rarely will meet with success against me, but these efforts do seem to have silenced others who used to post quite frequently.
As for me, I'll continue to share my thoughts with friends here (I've made many) and if others find it beneficial, I'm happy to be at your service. However, in the interest of fairness, I will say this: Everything I write may be a recipe for disaster. Okay? Great! Now that I've made that disclaimer, people who utilize ProBoards to get information can decide for themselves whether my posts are useful or not.
Good Fortune All. 
|
|
|
|
Post by rayskum on Nov 1, 2016 10:59:42 GMT -5
MNHoldem - Please keep going. I certainly value your perspective. Thank you for those.
|
|
|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Nov 1, 2016 11:01:50 GMT -5
I don't think you realize the impact you might have on investors. You are a sharp guy, and a moderator of this board. One might assume you know more than the average investor. You have alluded to being friends with Matt P. Now if you mix this all in with some of your claims its IMO a recipe for disaster. If you keep striking out on your predictions you have to expect people to criticize future ideas. (Sigh) It's amazing how things get put out of context around here.
First, I posted last year that I've had friendly emails/chats with former CFO Matt Pfeffer and that I consider him a friend in a business sense, not personal. I made that quite clear. Matt has never, nor would he ever, provided me with insider information. Every investor has the ability to pick up a phone, pen a letter, or send an email to the Investor Relations department. Getting a response doesn't make one an insider. So you can put that idea out of your mind.
Second, if I know "more than the average investor" than I suppose it may be because I research more than the average investor. When I post my discoveries, I nearly always include my source(s). I post this information so that others may benefit from my DD, just as I benefit from the work done by many others at ProBoards. You will not find a single post from me where I tell people to buy or sell. If you assume that my posting good information is a signal to buy, then you presume too much.
Third, it's amusing (to a degree) how often others will take any number of my posts and turn them into another "MnHoldem's prediction". An observation is not a prediction. Listing the possibilities, even ranking them into probabilities is not making a prediction. I often explain a number of possible scenarios on a given topic. Does that mean I'm predicting that any one of them is likely to happen? matt is a knowledgable poster who lays out multiple scenarios to help clarify an issue. Should we interpret his educational posts to mean that he is predicting any of those scenarios is what will happen? Nope. There are some members on ProBoards who will use that "prediction" label in a manner that, when used to mock, seems to in an attempt to discredit or to silence posters who share positive (or negative) viewpoints. That rarely will meet with success against me, but these efforts do seem to have silenced others who used to post quite frequently.
As for me, I'll continue to share my thoughts with friends here (I've made many) and if others find it beneficial, I'm happy to be at your service. However, in the interest of fairness, I will say this: Everything I write may be a recipe for disaster. Okay? Great! Now that I've made that disclaimer, people who utilize ProBoards to get information can decide for themselves whether my posts are useful or not.
Good Fortune All.
I for one, really appreciate your posts. You provide a great service like many other posters with your in-depth research. |
|
|
|
Post by slugworth008 on Nov 1, 2016 11:18:44 GMT -5
I think fundamentals trump technicals every day of the week. If MNKD can't secure operating cash, gain profitability, eventually reduce debt and sell Afrezza better than the anemic numbers we've seen so far, there isn't going to be any reversal. That chart is pretty scary. Over $20 a few years ago to mere pennies today. I'd call that a nightmare. I gotta give you that one silentknight. It's bottomline time for MNKD. Period. |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 1, 2016 11:31:34 GMT -5
Thank you! Sorry if I went off, but I simply don't see how my position is so illogical that it should prompt anybody to call me a dreamer, you know?
On January 21, 2016 MannKind Corporation announced that it had entered into a License and Collaboration Agreement with Receptor Life Sciences. Can anybody say that they saw that deal coming?
Today, MannKind has three terrific API in their pipeline supported by a proven pulmonary delivery system. Every single one of those API has been identified as having the potential to target some unmet medical need within the U.S. and globally, so I just happen to think that it's perfectly logical that one or more of the API-TS in MannKind's pipeline will attract a partner.
Especially the epinephrine candidate. |
|
|
|
Post by MnkdWASmyRtrmntPlan on Nov 1, 2016 11:31:53 GMT -5
MNHoldem - Please keep going. I certainly value your perspective. Thank you for those. I second that, and CCI's comment about MN. Keep up the good work, man ... I mean MN. |
|
|
|
Post by compound26 on Nov 1, 2016 11:33:14 GMT -5
MNHoldem - Please keep going. I certainly value your perspective. Thank you for those. I second that, and CCI's comment about MN. Keep up the good work, man ... I mean MN. strongly support. Please keep going. |
|
|
|
Post by derek2 on Nov 1, 2016 11:41:10 GMT -5
From the viewpoint of a "Debbie Downer" who is not nearly as optomistic as mnholdem , and as a mod on another board, I think he walks a difficult line quite well. Actually the mod team as a whole does a great and sometimes thankless job. Thumbs up! |
|
|
|
Post by 2011mnkdguy on Nov 1, 2016 11:58:33 GMT -5
Not to be rude, but must you always piss on people's hopes? I happen to think that Epinephrine is a hot item in the market right now. I don't think you realize the impact you might have on investors. You are a sharp guy, and a moderator of this board. One might assume you know more than the average investor. You have alluded to being friends with Matt P. Now if you mix this all in with some of your claims its IMO a recipe for disaster. If you keep striking out on your predictions you have to expect people to criticize future ideas. Epinephrine is a hot item on the market, that is a fact not a prediction. Also about moving up earnings he said "could be", that also is not a prediction. My prediction you aren't the sharpest tool in the shed, wait is that a prediction or a fact? hmm |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 1, 2016 12:28:56 GMT -5
Frankly, your remark about reverselo is a supposition. In my opinion, these guys are all okay. I suspect that they are just a bit discouraged these days. Given the state of things, I don't think we should be too critical.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeypotsandpans on Nov 1, 2016 13:13:37 GMT -5
I dont see something scary as the silence is scary enough on another note joeypotsandpans did talk about invese H&S at one point of time. may be the technicians can chime in Didnt dude go into hibernation rip van winkle mode? Someone should wake him and let him know. That guy never worried. This "dude" is still Zzzzz Zzzzz  still long, just not obsessed like a certain SO is lol. Iam2 sorry was off the board for a while so since you mentioned it in this thread and MN added the chart, yes that would still be in play from a technical standpoint. Maybe a surprise on Tues. will shake up certain landscapes, lord knows they need to be (one could only hope but don't want to turn this into a political thread)....actually just hope that Hamburg eventually meets her maker and has some serious explaining to do ...with the other scandals she's been involved in between her and her husband, one way or the other I'm sure kharma as defined: "The totality of a person's actions and conduct during successive incarnations, regarded as causally influencing his or her destiny" will come home to roost at some point...ok back to Zzzz Zzzz |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 1, 2016 13:16:19 GMT -5
Oh, and before I forget, since this was a Halloween thread that was suppose to be about scary things:
SideNote: I agree that SO is obsessed, Joey. I also think he's not very scary. Sweet dreams. |
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 1, 2016 13:21:08 GMT -5
|
|
still long, just not obsessed like a certain SO is lol. Iam2 sorry was off the board for a while so since you mentioned it in this thread and MN added the chart, yes that would still be in play from a technical standpoint. Maybe a surprise on Tues. will shake up certain landscapes, lord knows they need to be (one could only hope but don't want to turn this into a political thread)....actually just hope that Hamburg eventually meets her maker and has some serious explaining to do 
