|
Post by sophie on Feb 1, 2017 17:44:29 GMT -5
Still think that? Or how about Lakers saying CCO is going to be on the call to discuss partnership? How did that go? Keep posting lunacy and you will continue to get called out. don't have anyone to blame but ourselves. You kill one weed, 2 more sprout up right next to it. Mikesmilitaria came out of nowhere as did Kuka et al. People have the freedom to express whatever they want. It's on us if we believe it.
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Feb 1, 2017 17:56:39 GMT -5
AM: I agree 100% with you! For the 800th time from me; I've never, ever, seen nor experienced a r/s that I've liked or enjoyed, (been thru 2!!!), and just wish all this non stop talk about a r/s would cease and desist. It's a sign of desperation & weakness IMO if MNKD ever went this route, and I would be out for good if it ever happens. And, I suspect that some here perpetuate the talk for the sole purpose of frightening investors which helps to explain why I have so many blocked here. I will not post on this topic ever again. Done with this. GLTA true & genuine investors. With respect ilovekauiai one cannot bury their head in the sand either. Just because someone believes that a reverse split may be inevitable doe not mean they are interested in frightening investors. If Mannkind wants to stay listed on the Nasdaq then they have to do something and soon. What that is, is pure speculation from us. Obviously a reverse is one strategy. You may not want to think about it but you do have to admit that is among the list of possibilities.
|
|
|
Post by mikesmilitaria on Feb 1, 2017 17:59:01 GMT -5
KuKa is not incorrect YET and I too fully believe in an Amgen connection. I continue to have NO FEAR in the final outcome. I just hope I'm above ground to witness it.
|
|
|
Post by sophie on Feb 1, 2017 18:16:56 GMT -5
Can we make a deal? You make me whole on my initial investment if you're wrong. In return, I'll give you all my shares for free if you're right.
|
|
|
Post by mnkdorbust on Feb 1, 2017 19:39:54 GMT -5
When it comes to MNKD i feel like Griswold in Vegas Vacation. Starting to get the feeling Matt could push someone off a bridge while telling them how good it's going to be for them as they go
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Feb 1, 2017 19:57:35 GMT -5
I think it's just two things. Because Mike is involved and the uptick in Sales Force personnel is happening there will be discussion of that. Number 2, I think it's a slam dunk that there will be a reverse split. There's no way that can wait any longer. While a reverse split seems like a big blow and it can be, I bought Lexicon right before a reverse split. The stock LXRX has doubled since then and I think it was important to stay listed on the NASDAQ. I also found one article which looked at historical performance after RS for about 15-20 companies. It was generally positive for the large majority of them. Sluggobear, you nailed it perfectly!!!!
|
|
|
Post by therealcd on Feb 1, 2017 20:03:38 GMT -5
When it comes to MNKD i feel like Griswold in Vegas Vacation. Starting to get the feeling Matt could push someone off a bridge while telling them how good it's going to be for them as they go Funny. Here's the issue(s) coming from a Telecom Perspective. They have all the right people in the wrong places. That's my take. 30 years Telecom. They will doubt me however I have a pretty good track record. ------- Good luck. -------
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Feb 1, 2017 20:06:23 GMT -5
I also found one article which looked at historical performance after RS for about 15-20 companies. It was generally positive for the large majority of them. OTOH: "More broadly, however, recent research suggests that investing in a company that has just done a reverse split is a losing proposition. According to a 2006 paper that looked at 1,600 reverse-split stocks between 1962 and 2001, such stocks substantially underperformed the overall market during the three-year period following the reverse split -- by an average of 1.3 percentage points per month." www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/07/02/do-reverse-splits-ever-work.aspx
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Feb 1, 2017 20:43:01 GMT -5
Can we make a deal? You make me whole on my initial investment if you're wrong. In return, I'll give you all my shares for free if you're right. C'mon sophie, you're risk in that deal is minimal. ;-)
|
|
|
Post by cjm18 on Feb 1, 2017 21:14:07 GMT -5
I also found one article which looked at historical performance after RS for about 15-20 companies. It was generally positive for the large majority of them. OTOH: "More broadly, however, recent research suggests that investing in a company that has just done a reverse split is a losing proposition. According to a 2006 paper that looked at 1,600 reverse-split stocks between 1962 and 2001, such stocks substantially underperformed the overall market during the three-year period following the reverse split -- by an average of 1.3 percentage points per month." www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/07/02/do-reverse-splits-ever-work.aspxThe averages include bankruptcy I imagine. The better question is what percentage of stocks underperformed the market.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2017 21:51:09 GMT -5
Can we make a deal? You make me whole on my initial investment if you're wrong. In return, I'll give you all my shares for free if you're right. You should start a news letter with this strategy you are destined for success!
|
|
|
Post by sophie on Feb 1, 2017 22:39:13 GMT -5
Can we make a deal? You make me whole on my initial investment if you're wrong. In return, I'll give you all my shares for free if you're right. You should start a news letter with this strategy you are destined for success! Ya, I thought about Nate today and his recent double down. Bad timing. It's why I try not to follow anyone. I wanted to get out before today but I just decided to let it ride because I figured I had already prepared myself for RS news, but if I'd pulled out and it was actually a good thing and we were gonna thank Mike C one day, I don't think I'd forgive myself for missing a huge pop. I chose the lesser of two evils in my mind. Hoping I don't regret it.
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Feb 1, 2017 22:48:23 GMT -5
You should start a news letter with this strategy you are destined for success! Ya, I thought about Nate today and his recent double down. Bad timing. It's why I try not to follow anyone. I wanted to get out before today but I just decided to let it ride because I figured I had already prepared myself for RS news, but if I'd pulled out and it was actually a good thing and we were gonna thank Mike C one day, I don't think I'd forgive myself for missing a huge pop. I chose the lesser of two evils in my mind. Hoping I don't regret it. I cut back my position over the last month by 75% because I didn't see how a reverse split was avoidable - the reasoning is in another thread somewhere. I will get back in when this stabilizes and the possible need for further funding clarifies.
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Feb 1, 2017 22:53:13 GMT -5
OTOH: "More broadly, however, recent research suggests that investing in a company that has just done a reverse split is a losing proposition. According to a 2006 paper that looked at 1,600 reverse-split stocks between 1962 and 2001, such stocks substantially underperformed the overall market during the three-year period following the reverse split -- by an average of 1.3 percentage points per month." www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/07/02/do-reverse-splits-ever-work.aspxThe averages include bankruptcy I imagine. The better question is what percentage of stocks underperformed the market. Why would you exclude bankruptcies? You believe MNKD is absolutely immune to that possibility in the next 3 years? I'm sure virtually all of the companies in the RS study felt that way. Obviously that didn't mean that it could never happen.
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Feb 1, 2017 22:58:55 GMT -5
You should start a news letter with this strategy you are destined for success! Ya, I thought about Nate today and his recent double down. Nothing gets Nate down. He's at it on stocktwits, still bullish, happy to hear about the RS, calling for the 10:1 RS ratio. I'm sure he will back up the trucks to load his model portfolios with even more MNKD in the very near future.
|
|