|
Post by Cowgirl on Mar 30, 2017 15:23:03 GMT -5
I wonder what has been the fastest time a BOD has had to approve a reverse split after having approved a reverse split. This is just unbelievable....IT IS NOT A POSITION OF STRENGTH MATT!.
It is hard to fathom the such a destruction of assets - almost all of Al Mann's money - lost to what simply appears to be a company content on moving forward with a plan to try to sell Afrezza but up against a community of physicians with safety concerns, relying on trial evidence that doesn't differentiate end results and whom are reluctant to change.
I wonder if they ever ask themselves...What if our strategy and plan doesn't pan out as hoped?
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Mar 30, 2017 15:36:54 GMT -5
I wonder if they ever ask themselves...What if our strategy and plan doesn't pan out as hoped? Bankruptcy and move on to another company with the few millions they got while being management?
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Mar 30, 2017 16:41:56 GMT -5
I wonder what has been the fastest time a BOD has had to approve a reverse split after having approved a reverse split. I don't know what the record is, but at least we're not DRYS: Date Ratio 03/11/2016 1 for 25 08/15/2016 1 for 4 11/01/2016 1 for 15 01/23/2017 1 for 8 www.splithistory.com/drys/Note, the above site has incomplete data so it may not be completely accurate for all stocks.
|
|
|
Post by dejude42 on Mar 31, 2017 8:00:12 GMT -5
I believe all good people understand the most important objective to meet as a stock holder: Afrezza and MANNKIND needs time. Like it or not Afrezza works, Afrezza was compromised and there are traders that think it is right to become a GOD. Their duty and calling to destroy inventive stock funded corporations, Do I need to mention, they become very rich while doing this.
In our current stock market, "How many great inventions would have been stolen and/or companies gone under?" Thomas Edison attempted 1000 different styles of bulbs before success. I as a Mannkind stock holder, "Do not see any corporate comparison to that type of learning curve?"
Long term holders support MNKD, buyers and users in product does grow. A Fad it is not. It is not a pet rock, own your own star or a car everyone must have to be cool. This is a life changing, FDA approved, fast acting human mimicking, one of a kind product. Time, success and support: Mannkind has a product that will travel the world.
NOTE: EDISON did lose to Tesla and spent many bitter years angry in life: he wished a Direct Current (DC) environment instead of the current Alternating Current (AC). He won the right to create, and lost this right by forced buy out. AC is extremely wasteful, it can be transported over large distances cheaply but only useful one time. Low power DC is safer. Solar Power, battery back-up and DC to AC converters are becoming big markets.
|
|
|
Post by otherottawaguy on Mar 31, 2017 13:24:51 GMT -5
Drys is not exactly in the same boat (full pun intended). The parent company the manages the boats is bleeding the sibling dry by design. Drys buys more boats at the insistence of the parent, the parent takes the management fee, drys continues to bleed. They also go into deep oil rigs with ORIG but it looks like that spin off is also being bled dry by the parent too.
Nothing as blatant is apparent here.
OOG
|
|