|
|
Post by mnlearner on Nov 15, 2017 11:40:30 GMT -5
mnlearner Avatar 21 hours ago mnlearner said: I AM SORRY, I AM SORRY! YES, I DID BUY RECENTLY and I am now underwater with all shares. How long will THIS drubbing continue?? I shall try and stop it by saying I will NOT buy any more shares! Think I have learned my lesson. mnlearner, the board also has a minnlearner. just letting everyone know. two different human beings. Read more: mnkd.proboards.com/thread/8702/volume-tree?page=65#ixzz4yWEPnx7CI am 'minnlearner' [as in Minnesota learner] and I admit I haven't got a clue. MNLEARNER has their stuff together! FYI Read more: mnkd.proboards.com/thread/8702/volume-tree#ixzz4yWFSaxJPNO WAIT, THIS IS TOO CRAZY! IT APPEARS , DUE TO AUTO FILL IN, THAT I AM BOTH MNLEARNER AND MINNLEARNER or at least I can sign in as both! What the frack? SOOOO I have to change my previous post. When I sign in as mnlearner or minnlearner : I admit I haven't a clue. Now, where is the number of my therapist? I'm loosing it faster than I thought! |
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Nov 15, 2017 11:54:51 GMT -5
Tested 50 day moving average twice, repelled both times. Will we try it again?
|
|
|
|
Post by nz10k on Nov 15, 2017 12:09:54 GMT -5
Tested 50 day moving average twice, repelled both times. Will we try it again? today is the day. |
|
|
|
Post by rombic33 on Nov 15, 2017 15:41:07 GMT -5
So why did the Unknown decided to move PPS up today?
|
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Nov 15, 2017 16:00:00 GMT -5
So why did the Unknown decided to move PPS up today? We've been stuck in a trading pattern since the end of October. Price doesn't look ready to go anywhere, but that can change in a hurry once we break out of the pattern. |
|
|
|
Post by rombic33 on Nov 15, 2017 16:07:03 GMT -5
Behind that pattern are some blurry silhouettes which I can't see.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 15, 2017 17:00:27 GMT -5
Huge collection of uncoordinated actors with scant information to truly value the shares. Maybe the Deerfield min conversion price has some psychological attractor effect in the chaos theory of MNKD shares.
|
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Nov 15, 2017 17:08:16 GMT -5
DBC, are you trying to say that more stock traders know about MNKD than diabetics know about Afrezza?  |
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Nov 15, 2017 18:54:50 GMT -5
Huge collection of uncoordinated actors with scant information to truly value the shares. Maybe the Deerfield min conversion price has some psychological attractor effect in the chaos theory of MNKD shares. Couple that with consolidation just below the 50 day moving average. The longer it consolidates, the more the price is likely to move when it finally breaks out, in either direction. I don't expect a lot to change prior to the vote in the absence of material developments, but with this stock, who knows? |
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 15, 2017 19:02:01 GMT -5
Huge collection of uncoordinated actors with scant information to truly value the shares. Maybe the Deerfield min conversion price has some psychological attractor effect in the chaos theory of MNKD shares. Couple that with consolidation just below the 50 day moving average. The longer it consolidates, the more the price is likely to move when it finally breaks out, in either direction. I don't expect a lot to change prior to the vote in the absence of material developments, but with this stock, who knows? I checked the tea leaves and cat entrails as well and they give me no reason to doubt what you say What do you predict it will do after the vote? Feel free to offer two scenarios for up/down votes. |
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Nov 15, 2017 19:09:29 GMT -5
Couple that with consolidation just below the 50 day moving average. The longer it consolidates, the more the price is likely to move when it finally breaks out, in either direction. I don't expect a lot to change prior to the vote in the absence of material developments, but with this stock, who knows? I checked the tea leaves and cat entrails as well and they give me no reason to doubt what you say What do you predict it will do after the vote? Feel free to offer two scenarios for up/down votes. Fresh out of tea leaves, but a YES vote removes a lot of uncertainty, so I'll go with a small dip on the news, followed by upward movement. Of course, it may stick around $3.25 until January, unless the Deerfield curse is lifted. A NO vote, I say the price drops. Increases expense and uncertainty. Other views welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Nov 15, 2017 19:12:10 GMT -5
The vote is a non-issue, and should be a share price non-event. It is assumed by most that it will pass, but if it doesn't by some miracle, there will be a reaction.
|
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Nov 15, 2017 19:35:41 GMT -5
The vote is a non-issue, and should be a share price non-event. It is assumed by most that it will pass, but if it doesn't by some miracle, there will be a reaction. It was also assumed by most that the US would have its first female president. I would not assume it to pass, and encourage everyone to vote as they see fit. |
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Nov 15, 2017 19:46:18 GMT -5
The vote is a non-issue, and should be a share price non-event. It is assumed by most that it will pass, but if it doesn't by some miracle, there will be a reaction. It was also assumed by most that the US would have its first female president. I would not assume it to pass, and encourage everyone to vote as they see fit. Irrespective of what you or I assume, xanet, most big holders of the stock will vote for it (the big holders are people like Sports, Facts, Sla - women hold the wealth in the nation as well as MNKD shares, and perhaps polling them will tell us which way this will go). If it does not pass, the share price will suffer, unless a few really good things happen and become public in the meantime. Of course, the company may have to try to pass it again, maybe with fewer shares being authorized, and I would urge them to consult with DBC before setting that number. |
|
|
|
Post by helmut8056 on Nov 15, 2017 20:02:48 GMT -5
What is Peppy; chopped liver?
|
|
