|
|
Post by myocat on Oct 5, 2017 9:55:49 GMT -5
For those who near break even at $5 or already break even. The today $5.00 pps is $1.00 pre-split.
Can you imagine it could have been $25 pre-split and multiply your positions.
|
|
|
|
Post by captainwalker on Oct 5, 2017 10:00:08 GMT -5
Much to my dear wife's chagrin, I stupidly doubled my position in the $1s and $2... and today she, thankfully, has agreed to let me back in the house. Been a LONG year! Thanks MNKD?
|
|
|
|
Post by jgv on Oct 5, 2017 10:29:59 GMT -5
My wife wouldn’t let me cost average 😞. Said I was crazy for risking more of our money. I still think I’ll break even at some point
|
|
|
|
Post by pengiep on Oct 5, 2017 10:36:33 GMT -5
Skeptical spouses are the norm when investing with MNKD. My wife hasn't been following MNKD stock price since I recorded huge losses. It's enough that she can lord it over me for my bad investing policies. FOR NOW! The worm is turning and it will be wonderful.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Oct 5, 2017 10:37:28 GMT -5
good point 10 is 2
|
|
|
|
Post by straightly on Oct 5, 2017 16:47:18 GMT -5
The day we reverse split was one of the darkest day for MNKD. Today, it is brighter. A good day. |
|
|
|
Post by patten1962 on Oct 6, 2017 20:54:39 GMT -5
The day we reverse split was one of the darkest day for MNKD. Today, it is brighter. A good day. Can you make an argument that in a strange way to reverse split was good? What I mean by this is the float is smaller And this will help drive the stock price. Is this statement correct? |
|
|
|
Post by straightly on Oct 6, 2017 21:08:46 GMT -5
The day we reverse split was one of the darkest day for MNKD. Today, it is brighter. A good day. Can you make an argument that in a strange way to reverse split was good? What I mean by this is the float is smaller And this will help drive the stock price. Is this statement correct? The argument is easy and obvious: what does not kill you, make you stronger. I take heart in the fact that, in yesterday's crazy up and down, overwhelming majority of the battle tested longs stood like a mountain: strong! |
|
|
|
Post by thekindaguyiyam on Oct 6, 2017 21:27:27 GMT -5
Much to my dear wife's chagrin, I stupidly doubled my position in the $1s and $2... and today she, thankfully, has agreed to let me back in the house. Been a LONG year! Thanks MNKD? You are not alone. I can relate. |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Oct 6, 2017 21:52:34 GMT -5
You guys are making me dizzy talking this split vs pre-split jargon. We need to live and talk in the present period so we are always on the same page. Hard to drink my wine when I feel so dizzy already. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Oct 6, 2017 23:05:11 GMT -5
You guys are making me dizzy talking this split vs pre-split jargon. We need to live and talk in the present period so we are always on the same page. Hard to drink my wine when I feel so dizzy already. LOL hear hear |
|
|
|
Post by ezrasfund on Oct 7, 2017 1:06:35 GMT -5
This thread has me missing Spiro.
|
|
|
|
Post by letitride on Oct 7, 2017 4:38:25 GMT -5
For those who near break even at $5 or already break even. The today $5.00 pps is $1.00 pre-split. Can you imagine it could have been $25 pre-split and multiply your positions. Yes I can imagine what it would have been, but better yet I can imagine what it will be after a couple of forward splits with dividends thrown in. Back to the Future! |
|
|
|
Post by letitride on Oct 7, 2017 4:47:09 GMT -5
You guys are making me dizzy talking this split vs pre-split jargon. We need to live and talk in the present period so we are always on the same page. Hard to drink my wine when I feel so dizzy already. LOL Its not them its this Blue Sky breakout charts like this can have that affect on ya . Have another glass of wine and letitride! |
|
|
|
Post by me on Oct 7, 2017 5:45:14 GMT -5
For those who near break even at $5 or already break even. The today $5.00 pps is $1.00 pre-split. Can you imagine it could have been $25 pre-split and multiply your positions. , enough with the pre-split/post-split references. You are catastrophically wrong here and it demonstrates you either have no concept of what happens when a stock splits, reverse or forward, or you are intentionally obfuscating. No, MNKD could not have had a MC of $12.5 billion pre-split. I am using "pre-split" here only in the sense of designating a point in time and in no way implying a pre-split or post-split count of shares would change the MC. The MC is what it is. |
|
