|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 28, 2017 17:36:11 GMT -5
DBC, nice typo! "furry" Nonetheless, excellent use of the famous phrase, and you know what Will said in the same quote - "tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" and that does sound a lot like MNKD, so kudos to you!  Don't you know about the "furry" pattern in technical analysis? I'm sure Peppy can explain the significance better than I. I think you have to be able to discern which animal to know whether it is a good pattern or a bad pattern. |
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 28, 2017 17:40:13 GMT -5
Well, I don't see any up "trend" over a one week period... looks like a lot of sound and furry amounting to nothing for a month now. Though taken over 6 months we're up... so I'll chalk that up as a win for management. Suppose if you were to look at the competing scripts and saw less this week than past week(s)? Probably doesn't mean anything. Hopefully you aren't suggesting that you think you see Afrezza eating into Novolog or Humalog at this point. Our sales are still well under a rounding error for their sales. I'm somewhat encouraged by the script growth, but what is really needed is many more doctors writing scripts and I think the slow increase in NRx still shows that a lot of new doctors aren't yet jumping on board. I'm guessing we're still far under the number of active prescribers that there were right before SNY pulled the plug on marketing. |
|
|
|
Post by liane on Nov 28, 2017 18:18:02 GMT -5
She should have died hereafter.
There would have been a time for such a word.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by esstan2001 on Nov 28, 2017 18:43:36 GMT -5
DBC, nice typo! "furry" Nonetheless, excellent use of the famous phrase, and you know what Will said in the same quote - "tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" and that does sound a lot like MNKD, so kudos to you! Don't you know about the "furry" pattern in technical analysis? I'm sure Peppy can explain the significance better than I. I think you have to be able to discern which animal to know whether it is a good pattern or a bad pattern. yeah, and don't they apply furry logic in the decision process? I know that members in Congress do... |
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Nov 28, 2017 19:10:08 GMT -5
She should have died hereafter. There would have been a time for such a word. Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day To the last syllable of recorded time, And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. Ahh Macbeth! |
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Nov 28, 2017 19:14:23 GMT -5
Don't you know about the "furry" pattern in technical analysis? I'm sure Peppy can explain the significance better than I. I think you have to be able to discern which animal to know whether it is a good pattern or a bad pattern. yeah, and don't they apply furry logic in the decision process? I know that members in Congress do... Hell hath no furry..................wait! |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Nov 28, 2017 19:41:12 GMT -5
Actually, it's fuzzy logic ... and fuzzy wuz he wuz a bear ... who had no hair?
|
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 28, 2017 21:37:40 GMT -5
DBC, nice typo! "furry" Nonetheless, excellent use of the famous phrase, and you know what Will said in the same quote - "tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" and that does sound a lot like MNKD, so kudos to you! Don't you know about the "furry" pattern in technical analysis? I'm sure Peppy can explain the significance better than I. I think you have to be able to discern which animal to know whether it is a good pattern or a bad pattern. I'm wondering if DBC meant "fuzzy" pattern.
Fuzzy mathematics forms a branch of mathematics related to fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. It started in 1965 after the publication of Lotfi Asker Zadeh's seminal work Fuzzy sets. A fuzzy subset A of a set X is a function A:X→L, where L is the interval [0,1]. This function is also called a membership function. A membership function is a generalization of a characteristic function or an indicator function of a subset defined for L = {0,1}. More generally, one can use a complete lattice L in a definition of a fuzzy subset A.
The evolution of the fuzzification of mathematical concepts can be broken down into three stages: - straightforward fuzzification during the sixties and seventies,
- the explosion of the possible choices in the generalization process during the eighties,
- the standardization, axiomatization and L-fuzzification in the nineties
Rumor has it that the next stage in the evolution of fuzzy mathematics is...
4. peppy-fuzzification.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 29, 2017 9:14:18 GMT -5
All I know is that when I try to interpret her graphs, it gets a little fuzzy...  |
|
|
|
Post by minnlearner on Nov 29, 2017 9:27:14 GMT -5
Up 2%, with some volume, Pre trading. Any ideas what is going on?
|
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Nov 29, 2017 10:17:43 GMT -5
She should have died hereafter. There would have been a time for such a word. Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day To the last syllable of recorded time, And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. I am in blood Stepp'd in so far that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as go o'er. |
|
|
|
Post by casualinvestor on Nov 29, 2017 11:48:48 GMT -5
From Oct 15 to Oct 31st, 4 million more shares were sold short, due to increased supply. With no new good news, and after a big price spike, that's going to drive PPS down
That price action drove PPS down below $3.25. Meaning that at any time Deerfield could have pulled the trigger and gotten their 10M debt paid in shares (I don't think we would be informed?). We've seen in the past year that Deerfield has sold shares after they've been acquired but the timeframe is tough to gauge. So it's possible they have been selling some too, and that amount of shares is ~3.4 million.
From Nov 1st to Nov 15th, 600k more shares were sold short
Stock gamesmanship is one of the factors in pushing PPS down here, with the upcoming vote for more shares keeping longs from doing much buying. I'm hoping we get some good news at the vote. Not huge news, just that we hit guidance. I think this year is too soon to see any results from regional ads.
Missed my chance to buy more at $2.80, ah well. There may be other opportunities
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Nov 29, 2017 12:47:03 GMT -5
From Oct 15 to Oct 31st, 4 million more shares were sold short, due to increased supply. With no new good news, and after a big price spike, that's going to drive PPS down That price action drove PPS down below $3.25. Meaning that at any time Deerfield could have pulled the trigger and gotten their 10M debt paid in shares (I don't think we would be informed?). We've seen in the past year that Deerfield has sold shares after they've been acquired but the timeframe is tough to gauge. So it's possible they have been selling some too, and that amount of shares is ~3.4 million. From Nov 1st to Nov 15th, 600k more shares were sold short Stock gamesmanship is one of the factors in pushing PPS down here, with the upcoming vote for more shares keeping longs from doing much buying. I'm hoping we get some good news at the vote. Not huge news, just that we hit guidance. I think this year is too soon to see any results from regional ads. Missed my chance to buy more at $2.80, ah well. There may be other opportunities Being below $3.25 means the opposite. Deerfield, as with anyone, is not going to pay $3.25 to get shares when they are trading below that in the open market. |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Nov 29, 2017 12:57:55 GMT -5
"...Deerfield may, subject to the terms of the Deerfield Amendment, convert the principal amount under the Deerfield Notes from time to time into an aggregate of up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock after the effective date of the Deerfield Amendment. The conversion price will be the greater of (i) the average of the volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock for the three trading day period immediately preceding the date of any election by Deerfield to convert principal amounts of the Deerfield Notes and (ii) $3.25 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances described in the Deerfield Notes. Any conversions of principal by Deerfield under the Deerfield Notes will be applied first to reduce the October Payment, and after the October Payment has been satisfied, to reduce other principal payments due under the Deerfield Notes."
If Deerfield elects to convert the principal of MannKind debt it would be a material event that would require a SEC filings, so shareholders would definitely be informed.
|
|
Don't you know about the "furry" pattern in technical analysis?
