|
|
Post by liane on Feb 2, 2018 6:53:56 GMT -5
I notice lately that there are a lot of threads getting off topic or constantly dissing a particular article or author. We welcome all viewpoints here, but please keep it constructive and on topic. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by whale1r1 on Feb 2, 2018 8:24:37 GMT -5
You should be more specific...who what and when...
Regarding Spencer, when he is contested, he becomes confrontational and fails to answer the question.
Specifically, I would like to point out that he failed to identify where (what base) and far how long he was stationed in the Middle East. For spencer to claim that he knows a lot about the Middle East, but fails to identify the very basics of where he served is highly questionable to say the least.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Feb 2, 2018 8:28:33 GMT -5
You should be more specific...who what and when... Regarding Spencer, when he is contested, he becomes confrontational and fails to answer the question. Specifically, I would like to point out that he failed to identify where (what base) and far how long he was stationed in the Middle East. For spencer to claim that he knows a lot about the Middle East, but fails to identify the very basics of where he served is highly questionable to say the least. this explains a lot. Plenty of nerve agents used and weapon systems tested in the Middle East. A playground of sorts. |
|
|
|
Post by tchalaa on Feb 2, 2018 8:36:51 GMT -5
You are right and thanks for making the call, we have constantly be trying to be objective overhere. I suspect the fact that in the olddays we had topic like the new science, the marketing plan, company strategy it was easy to stay focus. Now it is all about Sales/ Marketing and just like in company it often get blurred  till the positive awaited outcome emerged |
|
|
|
Post by otherottawaguy on Feb 2, 2018 10:49:33 GMT -5
Nice to see that we stayed on topic about staying on topic...just sayin'
OOG
|
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Feb 2, 2018 12:29:10 GMT -5
Yeah, well, liane didn't specify which topic we're supposed to stay on, now did she?  |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 2, 2018 13:26:08 GMT -5
Yeah, well, liane didn't specify which topic we're supposed to stay on, now did she? No, just the important ones. What I heard today is that Mike is commuting with a few shareholders via email, they seem to like the back-and-forth and his communication and responses. One is that he understands about the shorts and feels the same way we do about them. |
|
|
|
Post by bioexec25 on Feb 2, 2018 13:33:34 GMT -5
I just liked that the term "dissing" was used.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Feb 2, 2018 13:35:12 GMT -5
Yeah, well, liane didn't specify which topic we're supposed to stay on, now did she? No, just the important ones. What I heard today is that Mike is commuting with a few shareholders via email, they seem to like the back-and-forth and his communication and responses. One is that he understands about the shorts and feels the same way we do about them. But, does he imagine he sees shorts where they don't exist |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Feb 2, 2018 14:13:16 GMT -5
No, just the important ones. What I heard today is that Mike is commuting with a few shareholders via email, they seem to like the back-and-forth and his communication and responses. One is that he understands about the shorts and feels the same way we do about them. But, does he imagine he sees shorts where they don't exist He sees dead men:-) |
|
|
|
Post by babaoriley on Feb 2, 2018 16:02:00 GMT -5
Yeah, well, liane didn't specify which topic we're supposed to stay on, now did she? No, just the important ones. What I heard today is that Mike is commuting with a few shareholders via email, they seem to like the back-and-forth and his communication and responses. One is that he understands about the shorts and feels the same way we do about them. Are those the emails he was engaged in when he forgot that he'd put the head of United Health on hold? |
|
|
|
Post by digger on Feb 2, 2018 20:20:55 GMT -5
No, just the important ones. What I heard today is that Mike is commuting with a few shareholders via email, they seem to like the back-and-forth and his communication and responses. One is that he understands about the shorts and feels the same way we do about them. Are those the emails he was engaged in when he forgot that he'd put the head of United Health on hold? Speaking of United Health, has MNKD ever simply asked them what would be required to get favorable tire placement? From a business perspective, it seems like whatever MNKD chooses to do should always be directed first at meeting the insurers demands. |
|
|
|
Post by xanet on Feb 2, 2018 20:33:47 GMT -5
Are those the emails he was engaged in when he forgot that he'd put the head of United Health on hold? Speaking of United Health, has MNKD ever simply asked them what would be required to get favorable tire placement? From a business perspective, it seems like whatever MNKD chooses to do should always be directed first at meeting the insurers demands. Well... what other initial approach do you think they might have used? I can't speak for MNKD, but I'm sure that was done long ago. |
|
till the positive awaited outcome emerged
