|
|
Post by dstevenson on Mar 2, 2015 23:51:08 GMT -5
is laughable, same with BOA
they downgrade the stock and attach a low price target, however their institutional side keeps accumlating...
GS increased position 176% but downgraded to sell, yea....right
|
|
|
|
Post by abcabcacba1 on Mar 3, 2015 0:19:02 GMT -5
Mannkind stock pps has been checked by too many options retail players, everybody bought a truck load of future and leap calls. No one wants to give up until to be forced or expired worthless.
|
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Mar 3, 2015 3:09:12 GMT -5
They did the same at about the same time in the companies evolution to 2 others of my favourites a few years ago (Crucell and Illumina) only to see the stock rise substantially after that and yes I suspect they and their friends were taking the other side of the selling trade.. With Illumina they probably made a mega killing. With Crucell just a killing... Last reported institutional buying of MNKD: www.nasdaq.com/symbol/mnkd/institutional-holdings?page=2Interesting... Goldman increased there holding rather significantly. Chump change for Goldman but this is only what we know they control directly. Next we will hear they are downgrading but become 5% owners like Black Rock... This would be funny if they weren't so above the law. Crooks. As their CEO said during the hight of the financial crisis: Goldman is doing God's work as they were ripping the faces off their own clients and 'friends'. Make a killing on the crashing of the financial system (and getting bailed out by taxpayers at the same time)... |
|
|
|
Post by kball on Mar 3, 2015 7:35:26 GMT -5
last call?
|
|
|
|
Post by nemzter on Mar 3, 2015 8:48:16 GMT -5
400K more shares to short, maybe? These damn crooks! All of them LOL
Owner Name Date Shared Held Change (Shares) Change (%) Value (in 1,000s)
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 12/31/2014 626,513 400,182 176.81 4,085
|
|
|
|
Post by 1 percenter on Mar 3, 2015 9:09:27 GMT -5
I am sure it is apparent by many that the vast majority of WS firms are as crooked at a dog's leg. Only exception might be RBC (hip hip hooray for Canadians!). It's just another storm to weather. Also be reminded that the company gave AMPLE warning that it would be a slow roll out. GS seems to forget that.
|
|
|
|
Post by abcabcacba1 on Mar 3, 2015 9:41:10 GMT -5
BAC wants to recover 9 millions shares today, GS helps his friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by crpminc on Mar 3, 2015 10:03:09 GMT -5
how did the down grade hit the messages boards last night before released to public ? I searched the web and could find not gs article ?
|
|
|
|
Post by bradleysbest on Mar 3, 2015 10:07:16 GMT -5
Because the crooks leaked it so they could benefit from the price drop!
|
|
|
|
Post by alethea on Mar 3, 2015 10:08:15 GMT -5
how did the down grade hit the messages boards last night before released to public ? I searched the web and could find not gs article ? Because the crooks wanted it to. They are unchecked in their power - at least as it relates to our gutless, corrupt, bought-and-paid-for congress. |
|
|
|
Post by seanismorris on Mar 3, 2015 10:11:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by crpminc on Mar 3, 2015 10:23:16 GMT -5
I just got off phone with gs 800-323-5678, operator has no idea where to transfer my call unless i have an extension # and also says no complaint # ??. I want to confirm how the news comes out on the boards 12hrs before the public and did they down grade to $3. Any one have any names and # to call ? if not i have to choice but to call sec.
|
|
|
|
Post by cubonwallstreet on Mar 3, 2015 10:33:06 GMT -5
Good luck with that battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Mar 3, 2015 10:35:30 GMT -5
BAC wants to recover 9 millions shares today, GS helps his friend. From a posting not too long ago here, someone stated that the terms of the deal give BAC the right to pay MNKD for the loaned shares at a price of $5.50. I presume that when they sold the loaned shares it was for more than this. Isn't their profit already locked in? Granted they could make a little more if the price drops below $5.50, but is this really manipulation over chump change of BAC trying to make a couple of extra million? Wondering if my understanding of the BAC transaction is wrong and there is some imperative for them to drive the stock down. |
|
|
|
Post by crpminc on Mar 3, 2015 10:39:37 GMT -5
just got off phone with gs jay olson, he confirmed he wrote the article, when asked how news came out 12hr before the public, he says you have to have a paid service like bloomberg to get it early (he didn't want to talk much). I am still going to follow up and report back.
|
|
