|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 6, 2017 20:29:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Dec 6, 2017 20:36:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by centralcoastinvestor on Dec 6, 2017 20:39:48 GMT -5
Interesting. So I guess this means that we won't get to see the redacted sections of the Sanofi agreement. I really want to know what kind of information is being concealed and why it is so important to keep it a secret? I am assuming that's what this is regarding. Right? |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Dec 6, 2017 20:42:53 GMT -5
I know the secret ... but, it'll cost you $20 to find out. Shhh ...
|
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Dec 6, 2017 20:43:14 GMT -5
Interesting. So I guess this means that we won't get to see the redacted sections of the Sanofi agreement. I really want to know what kind of information is being concealed and why it is so important to keep it a secret? I am assuming that's what this is regarding. Right? Agreed. Especially considering none of us would expect MNKD to ever have anything further to with them. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 6, 2017 20:43:49 GMT -5
I know the secret ... but, it'll cost you $20 to find out. Shhh ... $27:-))) |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 6, 2017 20:44:48 GMT -5
Interesting. So I guess this means that we won't get to see the redacted sections of the Sanofi agreement. I really want to know what kind of information is being concealed and why it is so important to keep it a secret? I am assuming that's what this is regarding. Right? Agreed. Especially considering none of us would expect MNKD to ever have anything further to with them. not none of us:-) |
|
|
|
Post by goyocafe on Dec 6, 2017 20:45:17 GMT -5
I know the secret ... but, it'll cost you $20 to find out. Shhh ... $27:-))) Wouldn’t that be $135 now?  |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 6, 2017 20:46:25 GMT -5
Wouldn’t that be $135 now? I wish, but I don’t believe so,better buy up:-) |
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Dec 6, 2017 21:59:20 GMT -5
Interesting. So I guess this means that we won't get to see the redacted sections of the Sanofi agreement. I really want to know what kind of information is being concealed and why it is so important to keep it a secret? I am assuming that's what this is regarding. Right? Withholding full information about the MannKind-Sanofi Agreement borders on MannKind breaching fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. I never thought that I'd seriously consider taking legal action against MannKind until today. This is deeply troubling to me as a shareholder.  |
|
|
|
Post by doctorgreenback on Dec 6, 2017 22:28:04 GMT -5
The initial FDA label and the spirometry requirements coupled with the lack of near term insurance coverage left Al Mann in the weakest negotiating position possible. 3 yrs of disaster and shareholder torment could have been avoided with a 2014 shelf offering just after the SNY deal was announced. 50m shares could have funded 3 TS drugs and covered all of the company's expenses to date. There is obviously something in that agreement that prevented MNKD from raising capital in late 2014. Be careful what you wish for.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Dec 6, 2017 22:45:13 GMT -5
But they have been withholding this information about SNY for a long time.
Maybe they didn’t think they needed to raise capital because SNY was planning on buying in?
Just a thought....but agree of course they should have raised the money.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Dec 6, 2017 23:00:23 GMT -5
The initial FDA label and the spirometry requirements coupled with the lack of near term insurance coverage left Al Mann in the weakest negotiating position possible. 3 yrs of disaster and shareholder torment could have been avoided with a 2014 shelf offering just after the SNY deal was announced. 50m shares could have funded 3 TS drugs and covered all of the company's expenses to date. There is obviously something in that agreement that prevented MNKD from raising capital in late 2014. Be careful what you wish for. well doctor whatever, sanofi had the euglycemic clamp information MNKD used to change the label and never acted on it. MNKD could not use the information until we got it back.
Sanofi did not work on the label change or insurance.
spirometry testing is nothing. so what?
www.mannkindcorp.com/Collateral/Documents/English-US/Baughman%20poster%20100-LB%20FINAL%20X2.pdf
sanofi sandbagged afrezza.
the problem here is the system sucks. Physicians are not in charge. NON Inferior is non inferior. insurance companies are making the decisions. We thought licensed physicians, our licensed physicians got to make the decisions. just another lie the USA has been sold.
Al Mann was 90. you are correct, 90 is a weak position. tom petty only made it to 67. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvlTJrNJ5lA
we will be back, we are eternal beings.
I am thinking of changing my proboards nick to doctorfakeo.
|
|
|
|
Post by brentie on Dec 6, 2017 23:13:10 GMT -5
Interesting. So I guess this means that we won't get to see the redacted sections of the Sanofi agreement. I really want to know what kind of information is being concealed and why it is so important to keep it a secret? I am assuming that's what this is regarding. Right? Withholding full information about the MannKind-Sanofi Agreement borders on MannKind breaching fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. I never thought that I'd seriously consider taking legal action against MannKind until today. This is deeply troubling to me as a shareholder. Matt: "You can expect us to be much more open with things that are going out with the company and forthcoming and transparent in the days to come." Jan 13, 2016. |
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Dec 6, 2017 23:15:55 GMT -5
heh, who killed JFK?
("You can expect us to be much more open with things that are going out with the company and forthcoming and transparent in the days to come.")
We human beings are lied to all the time. Interesting gig. Just lie.
|
|
