|
|
Post by sla55 on Jul 17, 2018 11:32:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rockstarrick on Jul 17, 2018 15:48:45 GMT -5
Hmm, I wonder what changed ??
Deerfield is holding,,
I’ll just leave this right here for a bit.
✌🏻😎
|
|
|
|
Post by akemp3000 on Jul 17, 2018 16:32:24 GMT -5
One guess is that after more than 10 years, this tough battle ground company is nearing the ultimate binary moment in its history. Either scripts begin rising, further partnerships are announced, international sales begin, cash rises or well...not. Deerfield should know more than Spencer, Adam, Nate, Michael K and all the other analysts regarding what's likely ahead. Good to see they're holding.
|
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Jul 17, 2018 17:06:50 GMT -5
One guess is that after more than 10 years, this tough battle ground company is nearing the ultimate binary moment in its history. Either scripts begin rising, further partnerships are announced, international sales begin, cash rises or well...not. Deerfield should know more than Spencer, Adam, Nate, Michael K and all the other analysts regarding what's likely ahead. Good to see they're holding. ....or we see another unexplained price jump that leads to dilution at a higher price only to see it fall off a cliff again. Hate to be negative but. |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jul 17, 2018 17:08:49 GMT -5
One guess is that after more than 10 years, this tough battle ground company is nearing the ultimate binary moment in its history. Either scripts begin rising, further partnerships are announced, international sales begin, cash rises or well...not. Deerfield should know more than Spencer, Adam, Nate, Michael K and all the other analysts regarding what's likely ahead. Good to see they're holding. ....or we see another unexplained price jump that leads to dilution at a higher price only to see it fall off a cliff again. Hate to be negative but. At this point, I will gladly take a spike and dilution at a higher price. Certainly beats getting diluted down here (more dilution to raise the same amount of cash, even lower PPS after dilution). |
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Jul 17, 2018 17:09:59 GMT -5
One guess is that after more than 10 years, this tough battle ground company is nearing the ultimate binary moment in its history. Either scripts begin rising, further partnerships are announced, international sales begin, cash rises or well...not. Deerfield should know more than Spencer, Adam, Nate, Michael K and all the other analysts regarding what's likely ahead. Good to see they're holding. ....or we see another unexplained price jump that leads to dilution at a higher price only to see it fall off a cliff again. Hate to be negative but. Be honest. You don’t hate to be negative, you sold at 33 cents. |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jul 17, 2018 17:12:09 GMT -5
....or we see another unexplained price jump that leads to dilution at a higher price only to see it fall off a cliff again. Hate to be negative but. Be honest. You don’t hate to be negative, you sold at 33 cents. He said he sold at 33 cents prior to the reverse split, which equates to $1.65, which is higher than where we are now... |
|
|
|
Post by brotherm1 on Jul 17, 2018 17:15:02 GMT -5
Explains why he’s feeling full of himself now
|
|
|
|
Post by tinkusr8215 on Jul 17, 2018 17:45:22 GMT -5
Be honest. You don’t hate to be negative, you sold at 33 cents. He said he sold at 33 cents prior to the reverse split, which equates to $1.65, which is higher than where we are now... did it trade at 33 cents prior to reverse split? |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Jul 17, 2018 18:06:53 GMT -5
He said he sold at 33 cents prior to the reverse split, which equates to $1.65, which is higher than where we are now... did it trade at 33 cents prior to reverse split? No, it was around 50 cents prior to reverse split, afterwards it bottomed out at around 13 cents pre-split (67 cents post-split). |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Jul 17, 2018 18:13:21 GMT -5
So pre-split isn't prior to reverse split ... okay
|
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Jul 17, 2018 18:25:55 GMT -5
Wouldn’t Deerfield be subjected to insider trading regulations? I would think that, as part of the debt negotiation, they were made aware of certain pivotal events and when they are likely to transpire. As a major shareholder (holding ~10% of outstanding shares) Deerfield may have their trading hands tied for a period of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Jul 17, 2018 18:57:47 GMT -5
Wouldn’t Deerfield be subjected to insider trading regulations? I would think that, as part of the debt negotiation, they were made aware of certain pivotal events and when they are likely to transpire. As a major shareholder (holding ~10% of outstanding shares) Deerfield may have their trading hands tied for a period of time. I tried to find the news article, remember deerfield getting inside information on insurance? 2016 article. Deerfield shorted MNKD all the way down. GS? Mike C did make a kind reference regarding Deerfield the last conference all. |
|
|
|
Post by falconquest on Jul 17, 2018 19:57:55 GMT -5
....or we see another unexplained price jump that leads to dilution at a higher price only to see it fall off a cliff again. Hate to be negative but. Be honest. You don’t hate to be negative, you sold at 33 cents. Pay attention, I said I sold at $0.46 cents or an equivalent $2.30 today. Don't see what's so hard about that. |
|
|
|
Post by gamblerjag on Jul 17, 2018 20:17:31 GMT -5
did it trade at 33 cents prior to reverse split? No, it was around 50 cents prior to reverse split, afterwards it bottomed out at around 13 cents pre-split (67 cents post-split). again and again and again why people never learn see all the confusion mentioning pre-split and reverse split no reason for it. it justs get people confused. People here appear so smart on the difficult part of understanding this drug and all the medical terms, but they can't get past just using a current split numbers. go figure |
|
