|
|
Post by mango on Nov 21, 2019 14:38:57 GMT -5
What does everyone think? How long until the PPS is $5 or above?
|
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Nov 21, 2019 14:50:05 GMT -5
What? No category for a week? Oh well, guess I have to play by the rules ... for a change.
But, that's mytakeonit
|
|
|
|
Post by mounts on Nov 21, 2019 15:58:57 GMT -5
What does everyone think? How long until the PPS is $5 or above? A potentially equally insightful poll would be how tolerable it is if it takes a couple of years for PPS to appreciate (assuming it will ultimately soar). |
|
|
|
Post by radgray68 on Nov 21, 2019 16:10:34 GMT -5
As soon as interim trial results start coming out of either India or U.S. pediatric trials, whichever comes first. Sanofi dropped us saying the product didn't work. We need to disprove that failure in the eyes of WS. There is always the chance of another UT like partnership announcement. (jumped over $6 last time, which probably more closely reflects the true stock price when shorts start to exit en mass)JMHO
|
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Nov 21, 2019 16:43:09 GMT -5
As soon as interim trial results start coming out of either India or U.S. pediatric trials, whichever comes first. Sanofi dropped us saying the product didn't work. We need to disprove that failure in the eyes of WS. There is always the chance of another UT like partnership announcement. (jumped over $6 last time, which probably more closely reflects the true stock price when shorts start to exit en mass)JMHO The jump to $6 was the pump and dump fund raise. It jumped to around $2 on the UTHR partnership. |
|
|
|
Post by ktim on Nov 21, 2019 17:33:15 GMT -5
As soon as interim trial results start coming out of either India or U.S. pediatric trials, whichever comes first. Sanofi dropped us saying the product didn't work. We need to disprove that failure in the eyes of WS. There is always the chance of another UT like partnership announcement. (jumped over $6 last time, which probably more closely reflects the true stock price when shorts start to exit en mass)JMHO I think Sanofi said it wasn't commercially viable. I don't believe they made any statements about Afrezza not working from a physiological perspective. Granted what they did hasn't helped the commercial viability, but MNKD's history of trying to market it on their own has certainly made it difficult argue Sanofi was totally off base in their assertion that Afrezza has issues with market acceptance. As for the poll, I think it reasonable to assume that $5 would require TreT revenue to start showing promise and that is more than a year away. I'm not voting, however, as the history of my investment in MNKD has proven that I've consistently under predicted the difficulties MNKD faces. I could pull a "Nate" and simply say I think it will eventually get there. |
|
|
|
Post by radgray68 on Nov 21, 2019 17:35:41 GMT -5
As soon as interim trial results start coming out of either India or U.S. pediatric trials, whichever comes first. Sanofi dropped us saying the product didn't work. We need to disprove that failure in the eyes of WS. There is always the chance of another UT like partnership announcement. (jumped over $6 last time, which probably more closely reflects the true stock price when shorts start to exit en mass)JMHO The jump to $6 was the pump and dump fund raise. It jumped to around $2 on the UTHR partnership. Maybe you weren't here back then, but the price went to the equivalent of $50 on speculation of approval the first time. We didn't have an optimal protocol on those trials. Now, we do. History doesn't always repeat itself, but, it does echo. BTW, when it launched to $6, there were still over 20 million shares sold short that needed to be purchased. |
|
|
|
Post by awesomo on Nov 21, 2019 17:57:26 GMT -5
The jump to $6 was the pump and dump fund raise. It jumped to around $2 on the UTHR partnership. Maybe you weren't here back then, but the price went to the equivalent of $50 on speculation of approval the first time. We didn't have an optimal protocol on those trials. Now, we do. History doesn't always repeat itself, but, it does echo. BTW, when it launched to $6, there were still over 20 million shares sold short that needed to be purchased. I've been here since before FDA approval, you specifically mentioned jumping to $6 on the UTHR partnership (saying this is where we would be without shorts, lol) which is extremely false. |
|
|
|
Post by cretin11 on Nov 21, 2019 18:00:07 GMT -5
As soon as interim trial results start coming out of either India or U.S. pediatric trials, whichever comes first. Sanofi dropped us saying the product didn't work. We need to disprove that failure in the eyes of WS. There is always the chance of another UT like partnership announcement. (jumped over $6 last time, which probably more closely reflects the true stock price when shorts start to exit en mass)JMHO If by "last time" you mean the last partnership agreement, then it was $2 not $6. |
|
|
|
Post by radgray68 on Nov 21, 2019 18:12:36 GMT -5
Maybe you weren't here back then, but the price went to the equivalent of $50 on speculation of approval the first time. We didn't have an optimal protocol on those trials. Now, we do. History doesn't always repeat itself, but, it does echo. BTW, when it launched to $6, there were still over 20 million shares sold short that needed to be purchased. I've been here since before FDA approval, you specifically mentioned jumping to $6 on the UTHR partnership (saying this is where we would be without shorts, lol) which is extremely false. You are correct. I got the events twisted. Doesn't change the possibility of a spike above $5 as I stated. "(saying this is where we would be without shorts, lol) which is extremely false." - How so? Because I believe it will go a lot higher once the shorts truly start to exit. Maybe not the MOASS unicorn that people talk about, but those shares do have to be returned someday. |
|
|
|
Post by porkini on Nov 22, 2019 10:19:25 GMT -5
What? No category for a week? Oh well, guess I have to play by the rules ... for a change. But, that's mytakeonit And here I thought you would have said, "It's $5 somewhere!"  |
|
|
|
Post by mango on Nov 22, 2019 11:06:43 GMT -5
I wonder who the 2 people are that voted in year 2076 😂
Personally, I voted within 12 months, which for me, means not before 6 months (7-12). So many potential catalysts next year and beyond...
|
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Nov 22, 2019 12:07:35 GMT -5
I wonder who the 2 people are that voted in year 2076 😂 I suspect they forgot about the possibility of a RS long before before then.  |
|
|
|
Post by mytakeonit on Nov 22, 2019 13:12:50 GMT -5
I wonder who the 2 people are that voted in year 2076 😂 Personally, I voted within 12 months, which for me, means not before 6 months (7-12). So many potential catalysts next year and beyond... mango - I'm surprised that you didn't choose the year 2525 ... if Mannkind is still alive. www.youtube.com/watch?v=yesyhQkYrQMBut, that's mytakeonit |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Nov 22, 2019 13:48:18 GMT -5
I wonder who the 2 people are that voted in year 2076 😂 Personally, I voted within 12 months, which for me, means not before 6 months (7-12). So many potential catalysts next year and beyond... mango - I'm surprised that you didn't choose the year 2525 ... if Mannkind is still alive. www.youtube.com/watch?v=yesyhQkYrQMBut, that's mytakeonit Perfect..if Mannkind is still alive, and sports can survive🤣 |
|
