|
Post by itellthefuture777 on Jul 26, 2020 20:11:40 GMT -5
First of all N1 survives Covid-19 warrants a questionnaire. The reason is in medical statistics you must consider "severity" which tosses out basic statistics when death is the severity and you have one N1 Afrezza user reporting he survived it required to make mandatory root cause investigation. E.g.. A questionnaire to all Afrezza users to collect information directly related to the original condition Covid-19...and the Afrezza user outcomes. That is where you will see greater statistical N to do a calculation of Afrezza occurrence of Covid-19 survival. If Afrezza has high survival rates in Covid-19 cases..that would be huge..just saying..where's the questionnaire..the data?...go get it! After all existing FDA approved drugs are supposed to be evaluated..my guess is Mannkind May already have that and has #2 nano professor doing some deep research into biomechanics of action..I dunno just make logical sense..to me anyways Does N1 survives COVID warrant a questionnaire? In a world of unlimited resources, why not? In the real world, not going to happen. Thousands of diabetics have survived COVID, why is the fact N1 survived significant enough to assign resources for as opposed to each of those other diabetics? The balance of probability heavily favors N1 to survive COVID since they are on Afrezza so you can rule out any lung comorbidities, and presumably their HbA1c is well controlled. If Mannkind wanted to do this (because nobody else will) then the way to go would be a retrospective survey of claims data from a big insurer tied against admissions and outcomes. That may well require an intermediary like a Satish Garg at the University of Colorado to do the actual research. The other source would be VDEX, but the sample size may be a bit small. Again my guess is Mannkind already has done this phase 1 questionnaire ..maybe has the #2 nano professor in the world looking at the biomechanics of what's going on at the cellular nano levels..just because we hear of an Afrezza user doesn't mean Mannkind has only one positive response..maybe they have more..maybe they already figured out the why...maybe..hmm
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Jul 26, 2020 21:21:05 GMT -5
Does N1 survives COVID warrant a questionnaire? In a world of unlimited resources, why not? In the real world, not going to happen. Thousands of diabetics have survived COVID, why is the fact N1 survived significant enough to assign resources for as opposed to each of those other diabetics? The balance of probability heavily favors N1 to survive COVID since they are on Afrezza so you can rule out any lung comorbidities, and presumably their HbA1c is well controlled. If Mannkind wanted to do this (because nobody else will) then the way to go would be a retrospective survey of claims data from a big insurer tied against admissions and outcomes. That may well require an intermediary like a Satish Garg at the University of Colorado to do the actual research. The other source would be VDEX, but the sample size may be a bit small. Again my guess is Mannkind already has done this phase 1 questionnaire ..maybe has the #2 nano professor in the world looking at the biomechanics of what's going on at the cellular nano levels..just because we hear of an Afrezza user doesn't mean Mannkind has only one positive response..maybe they have more..maybe they already figured out the why...maybe..hmm A questionnaire isn't necessary (although you could ask Joey, I think he had COVID a while back so he would be on the list) as the aggregate data is all in the insurer's database. I think it is safe to say if they have reached a positive conclusion we would have heard by now - if you have a treatment for COVID that works why would you not immediately share it? I still think there is zero chance they are researching this, but if they did that's how I would do it. Who is the #2 nano professor in the world?
|
|
|
Post by itellthefuture777 on Jul 26, 2020 23:07:43 GMT -5
Again my guess is Mannkind already has done this phase 1 questionnaire ..maybe has the #2 nano professor in the world looking at the biomechanics of what's going on at the cellular nano levels..just because we hear of an Afrezza user doesn't mean Mannkind has only one positive response..maybe they have more..maybe they already figured out the why...maybe..hmm A questionnaire isn't necessary (although you could ask Joey, I think he had COVID a while back so he would be on the list) as the aggregate data is all in the insurer's database. I think it is safe to say if they have reached a positive conclusion we would have heard by now - if you have a treatment for COVID that works why would you not immediately share it? I still think there is zero chance they are researching this, but if they did that's how I would do it. Who is the #2 nano professor in the world? Vladimir P. Torchilin..check it..here I'll do it.. news.northeastern.edu/2011/01/24/torchilincited/
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Jul 27, 2020 8:22:09 GMT -5
Thanks. He is interesting. I will have to look at him more.
|
|
|
Post by itellthefuture777 on Jul 27, 2020 11:23:14 GMT -5
Thanks. He is interesting. I will have to look at him more. yeah I mean an Afrezza user getting through Covid-19 ARDS without ICU..you want the best right?
|
|
|
Post by sayhey24 on Jul 27, 2020 12:56:40 GMT -5
Joey - there have been some people asking about COVID-19 on the facebook group. You may want to share your experience there.
|
|
|
Post by joeypotsandpans on Jul 27, 2020 13:05:36 GMT -5
Joey - there have been some people asking about COVID-19 on the facebook group. You may want to share your experience there. I'm not on facebook, so maybe someone can feel free to direct them here? Thx!
|
|
|
Post by neil36 on Jul 27, 2020 18:02:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Jul 27, 2020 18:13:22 GMT -5
That doc's apparent success is not as clear cut as he makes it (but he is a former politician, so truth and accuracy and science may not be his main concerns). Not going to bother posting links, people can google for themselves. Still, it would be nice if he really has something.
|
|
|
Post by neil36 on Jul 27, 2020 18:43:30 GMT -5
That doc's apparent success is not as clear cut as he makes it (but he is a former politician, so truth and accuracy and science may not be his main concerns). Not going to bother posting links, people can google for themselves. Still, it would be nice if he really has something. Not advocating or supporting his suggested treatment. But interesting that it is another is inhaled
|
|