Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 20:05:34 GMT -5
I heard many people believe DD has quit his position after receiving news of Sanofi departure. I was asked to email Matt and have them update their website as proof that he will still be with MannKind. Since it is late Friday evening, I called, unfortunately he is not in but the receptionist instructed to read the press release regarding JPM. In the release, it states both Matt and DD will be attending the conference.
In addition, Matt will be traveling next week. I will email Matt expressing everyone's concern that the website has not been updated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 20:16:27 GMT -5
I heard many people believe DD has quit his position after receiving news of Sanofi departure. I was asked to email Matt and have them update their website as proof that he will still be with MannKind. Since it is late Friday evening, I called, unfortunately he is not in but the receptionist instructed to read the press release regarding JPM. In the release, it states both Matt and DD will be attending the conference. In addition, Matt will be traveling next week. I will email Matt expressing everyone's concern that the website has not been updated. Someone already emailed him and posted it on twitter a couple of days ago. His answer was he has not been able to sit down for photo yet and he expects him to be there at the JPM conference. Anyone ever heard of a cell phone pic or maybe a stronger delivery like DSuane will def be there ready to take this head on. These guys have no testicles. I hope duane is different. Now it I know its Netflix and you cont compare the two but did anyone here his speech yesterday. The guy light the room on fire. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Jan 8, 2016 20:25:00 GMT -5
We don't even need a pic. He is not listed as the CEO. Al is. Its stuff like this that causes people to bash on Twitter. They are saying the press release stating that he and Matt will be at the JP Morgan CC is dated before SNY dumped us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 20:35:42 GMT -5
Matt and DD have tremendous issues that require their immediate attention. I would prefer them deal with insurance and partnership issues instead of updating their website with photos.
It has been a stressful week, month and year, how about putting the BK supposition on ice until there is data to support such claims.
|
|
|
|
Post by sccrbrg on Jan 8, 2016 20:56:20 GMT -5
Is this just like how you said there was ABSOLUTELY NO WAY SNY would punt us???
If he's the CEO they need to update their information pages - absolutely ridiculous that they provide this little clarity.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnkdfann on Jan 8, 2016 20:59:58 GMT -5
Is this just like how you said there was ABSOLUTELY NO WAY SNY would punt us??? If he's the CEO they need to update their information pages - absolutely ridiculous that they provide this little clarity. But things are so great, why would they change their modus operandi now? According to so many posters, the break-up is the best thing to happen since the slicing of bread! |
|
|
|
Post by lyric14882 on Jan 8, 2016 21:30:16 GMT -5
Matt and DD have tremendous issues that require their immediate attention. I would prefer them deal with insurance and partnership issues instead of updating their website with photos. It has been a stressful week, month and year, how about putting the BK supposition on ice until there is data to support such claims. I am not expecting either Matt or DD to personally update the website. I guess I expected they hired a web person to do that. |
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Jan 8, 2016 22:13:00 GMT -5
The company is getting slaughtered and they can't update their website with accurate CEO information? Really???
A few possible explanations for this lack of website update:
1. They are just clueless and don't know 'little things' like having the wrong CEO listed on their website is confusing and does them harm. Possible?
or
2. They don't have the HR 'talent' to update their website. Less likely?
or
3. Al Mann still is the CEO and the January 5th start date for their new guy isn't working out since Sanofi walked. Highly possible?
Which one is better from an investment point of view? Under which scenario would you invest? Before anyone calls me a basher who can argue with these simple possibilities?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 22:18:07 GMT -5
All possibilities but if DD did not take the position, it would have been reported the next day.
|
|
|
|
Post by nylefty on Jan 8, 2016 22:32:29 GMT -5
Matt and DD have tremendous issues that require their immediate attention. I would prefer them deal with insurance and partnership issues instead of updating their website with photos. It has been a stressful week, month and year, how about putting the BK supposition on ice until there is data to support such claims. I am not expecting either Matt or DD to personally update the website. I guess I expected they hired a web person to do that. They've laid off a lot of people. I suspect that the "web person" was among them. |
|
|
|
Post by lyric14882 on Jan 8, 2016 22:38:25 GMT -5
I am not expecting either Matt or DD to personally update the website. I guess I expected they hired a web person to do that. They've laid off a lot of people. I suspect that the "web person" was among them. Okay, well then we are in serious sh(* if stockholders are right in thinking that the CEO and CFO are responsible for updating html. |
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Jan 8, 2016 22:41:14 GMT -5
I am not expecting either Matt or DD to personally update the website. I guess I expected they hired a web person to do that. They've laid off a lot of people. I suspect that the "web person" was among them. So basically a mix of # 1 and # 2. Not reassuring. After Matt's "I expect" hedging as to DD showing up maybe 1, 2 and 3... |
|
|
|
Post by lyric14882 on Jan 8, 2016 22:48:14 GMT -5
I am not expecting either Matt or DD to personally update the website. I guess I expected they hired a web person to do that. They've laid off a lot of people. I suspect that the "web person" was among them. I fixed it for them: <p align=left><img alt="" src="/Collateral/Images/English-US/Duane_DeSisto_thumbnail.jpg"></p> <h3>Duane M. DeSisto</h3> <p>Duane M. DeSisto is our Chief Executive Officer. <br><a href="/about-us-executive-management-duane.htm" target=_self>more</a></p></td> <td class=table-row style="WIDTH: 25%" vAlign=top align=left> |
|
|
|
Post by lorcan458 on Jan 8, 2016 22:49:23 GMT -5
There should be no need for a web developer. Modern websites are built on content management frameworks that allow content (even menus and new pages based on templates) to be added with editing tools as simple as this message board. There is no excuse for not keeping the website up to date.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsrancho on Jan 8, 2016 23:40:54 GMT -5
The company is getting slaughtered and they can't update their website with accurate CEO information? Really??? A few possible explanations for this lack of website update: 1. They are just clueless and don't know 'little things' like having the wrong CEO listed on their website is confusing and does them harm. Possible? or 2. They don't have the HR 'talent' to update their website. Less likely? or 3. Al Mann still is the CEO and the January 5th start date for their new guy isn't working out since Sanofi walked. Highly possible? Which one is better from an investment point of view? Under which scenario would you invest? Before anyone calls me a basher who can argue with these simple possibilities? I'll have to go with one because I've just been reminded by a friend that many times Matt has had to be reminded to up date the website. |
|
