|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Jan 19, 2016 22:17:46 GMT -5
If true, one has to wonder how many stocks GS covers on which it has a $0.25 price target. More to the point, how many penny stocks does GS cover? Surely, they can find better stocks to which to assign their highly paid, or should I say, overpaid analysts. It also provide an opportunity for the shorts to shake the weak hands easily when no announcement of any deals this week b/c longs have expected announcement was to be released within a few days after Jan 13! If only I weren't so strong and the shorts had shaken my grip free of my MNKD back when it traded 10x higher... first time I've ever been too strong for my own good.
|
|
|
Post by parrerob on Jan 20, 2016 6:13:37 GMT -5
I would like to know what GSCO has to do with the current state of scripts and current technosphere pipe line
I would like to know why GSCO is still working manipulating the market involved with cartels and big financial entities, instead of going directly to jail.
Just a quinck and absolutely not exhaustive list of their recent financial experience ! - July 2015 1,8 Million fine: because of sending bad data to the Order Audit Trail system, which Finra uses to monitor the trading practices of regulated firms. (Meaning they manipulated the market) - June 2015: 7 Million fine because of Goldman’s control environment was deficient in several ways, significantly disrupted the markets, and failed to meet the standard required of broker-dealers under the market access rule - October 2015: 50 Million fine because stoling secret supervisory information from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Their Great Ethics operate even in Dark Pool (can't imagine): July 2014 fine for trading at lower price in Dark Pool activities - April 2014: 302 Million fine by European competition authorities because Goldman Sachs and 10 other companies were running a secret cartel to block competition in the market for electricity power cables.
GS is manipulating the market for making Billions and for controlling small companies to not create problems to their "cartel" friends. In US SEC is involved receiving fees from GS through this ridiculous fine system that every time GS accept to pay !
Coming back to Your question, GS has nothing to do with poor scripts (this was up to SNY) and TS pipeline. They are only involved in trying to destroy the company manipulating all they can in order to let them alone in US with no possibility to collect cash for their development.
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Jan 20, 2016 7:25:02 GMT -5
I would like to know what GSCO has to do with the current state of scripts and current technosphere pipe line
I would like to know why GSCO is still working manipulating the market involved with cartels and big financial entities, instead of going directly to jail.
Just a quinck and absolutely not exhaustive list of their recent financial experience ! - July 2015 1,8 Million fine: because of sending bad data to the Order Audit Trail system, which Finra uses to monitor the trading practices of regulated firms. (Meaning they manipulated the market) - June 2015: 7 Million fine because of Goldman’s control environment was deficient in several ways, significantly disrupted the markets, and failed to meet the standard required of broker-dealers under the market access rule - October 2015: 50 Million fine because stoling secret supervisory information from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Their Great Ethics operate even in Dark Pool (can't imagine): July 2014 fine for trading at lower price in Dark Pool activities - April 2014: 302 Million fine by European competition authorities because Goldman Sachs and 10 other companies were running a secret cartel to block competition in the market for electricity power cables.
GS is manipulating the market for making Billions and for controlling small companies to not create problems to their "cartel" friends. In US SEC is involved receiving fees from GS through this ridiculous fine system that every time GS accept to pay !
Coming back to Your question, GS has nothing to do with poor scripts (this was up to SNY) and TS pipeline. They are only involved in trying to destroy the company manipulating all they can in order to let them alone in US with no possibility to collect cash for their development.
off topic, I have an opinion as to why, www.newyorkfed.org/markets/pridealers_current.html gs is part of the US government financing arm.
|
|
|
Post by coo2002coo on Jan 20, 2016 9:34:18 GMT -5
Bought more at $0.691 at the opening.....
|
|
|
Post by peppy on Jan 20, 2016 9:35:16 GMT -5
looks like shorts are covering. my take, the world stock market meltdown, margin calls he to have to be paid.
Cover
|
|
|
Post by lakon on Jan 20, 2016 11:08:54 GMT -5
One man's nightmare is another's dream come true. Never would I have expected to be able to buy shares of MNKD this cheap. Perhaps some would call it risky, but I think there is an often recited quote from Warren Buffet that is appropriate here. Perhaps Jim Cramer's, a favorite of this board, "Back up the truck and BUY BUY BUY!" I mean, if you believed at $10/sh, you should be giddy at less than $1/sh. It IS really that SIMPLE.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2016 12:42:31 GMT -5
looks like shorts are covering. my take, the world stock market meltdown, margin calls he to have to be paid. Cover This was my rationale also. As the market crashes they cover as more opportunity opens up on the board. The flip side is maybe MNKD is still the better opportunity but hopefully thats not the case
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2016 12:43:44 GMT -5
I would like to know what GSCO has to do with the current state of scripts and current technosphere pipe line
I would like to know why GSCO is still working manipulating the market involved with cartels and big financial entities, instead of going directly to jail.
Just a quinck and absolutely not exhaustive list of their recent financial experience ! - July 2015 1,8 Million fine: because of sending bad data to the Order Audit Trail system, which Finra uses to monitor the trading practices of regulated firms. (Meaning they manipulated the market) - June 2015: 7 Million fine because of Goldman’s control environment was deficient in several ways, significantly disrupted the markets, and failed to meet the standard required of broker-dealers under the market access rule - October 2015: 50 Million fine because stoling secret supervisory information from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Their Great Ethics operate even in Dark Pool (can't imagine): July 2014 fine for trading at lower price in Dark Pool activities - April 2014: 302 Million fine by European competition authorities because Goldman Sachs and 10 other companies were running a secret cartel to block competition in the market for electricity power cables.
GS is manipulating the market for making Billions and for controlling small companies to not create problems to their "cartel" friends. In US SEC is involved receiving fees from GS through this ridiculous fine system that every time GS accept to pay !
Coming back to Your question, GS has nothing to do with poor scripts (this was up to SNY) and TS pipeline. They are only involved in trying to destroy the company manipulating all they can in order to let them alone in US with no possibility to collect cash for their development.
Anyone who is long mnkd is subject to numerous posts about GSCO fines as its posted non stop across social media. Too many focus on it and its out of our hands. Focus on MNKD and what we need to be successful.
|
|
|
Post by factspls88 on Jan 20, 2016 17:33:02 GMT -5
looks like shorts are covering. my take, the world stock market meltdown, margin calls he to have to be paid. Cover This was my rationale also. As the market crashes they cover as more opportunity opens up on the board. The flip side is maybe MNKD is still the better opportunity but hopefully thats not the case Until something more concrete happens that is specific to mnkd, I view any gains in the pps to be the result of margin calls that need to be covered. I'm not happy that it is that way, but that's how I see it. I am grateful for any one cent gain no matter what the cause given the number of shares I hold.
|
|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Jan 20, 2016 22:14:05 GMT -5
One man's nightmare is another's dream come true. Never would I have expected to be able to buy shares of MNKD this cheap. Perhaps some would call it risky, but I think there is an often recited quote from Warren Buffet that is appropriate here. Perhaps Jim Cramer's, a favorite of this board, "Back up the truck and BUY BUY BUY!" I mean, if you believed at $10/sh, you should be giddy at less than $1/sh. It IS really that SIMPLE. When at $10... the first time? Much dilution since then. How much more to come? That said, if MNKD survives (and to do that Afrezza must succeed) it seems hard to fathom Afrezza sales so low and dilution so severe as to not warrant a market cap higher than where we are. But of course to get at a risk adjusted fair market value now, one must factor in the risk that it is bankruptcy not merely dilution.
|
|
|
Post by lakon on Jan 23, 2016 8:55:55 GMT -5
When at $10...the second time. There has been no significant dilution for this period. People have complained that they did not dilute at $10 in retrospect after FDA approval. I won't bother rehashing my opinion of this delusion. I do not expect BK nor dilution. I would not be surprised by another round of debt financing if not a few more $100 million dollar backlogs with "small" biotech's looking for a blockbuster. It seems not too difficult to extend the cash runway for another 2-3 years. By that time, Afrezza should be on its way, not to mention generating cash flow throughout the waiting period. If I was wise enough, and gutsy enough, to have shorted from $10, I would have covered already. Holding the short is just hubris, or something worse.
|
|
|
Post by alltimeduck on Jan 23, 2016 10:56:55 GMT -5
I agree .If the price is cut to below pens sales will explode.
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Jan 23, 2016 11:33:42 GMT -5
I agree .If the price is cut to below pens sales will explode. I don't believe it will explode although I definitely believe it will get better. I pay the same for insulin regardless of the price the insurer pays so cutting the price may benefit the insurer but it doesn't help me. Where it does help is that it may make getting into tier 2 faster which then makes it possible for doctors to prescribe it. Whether they will prescribe it is another thing, I think they will but slowly for a while until they are comfortable with it.
|
|
|
Post by bioexec25 on Jan 23, 2016 11:53:28 GMT -5
I agree .If the price is cut to below pens sales will explode. I don't believe it will explode although I definitely believe it will get better. I pay the same for insulin regardless of the price the insurer pays so cutting the price may benefit the insurer but it doesn't help me. Where it does help is that it may make getting into tier 2 faster which then makes it possible for doctors to prescribe it. Whether they will prescribe it is another thing, I think they will but slowly for a while until they are comfortable with it. AgedH, do you think Mnkd is coordinating the price cuts with insurance / others to optimize getting the word out and possible accelerating move to Tier 2? I suppose they only review Qtly or so, but it seems this needs to be planned versus just announced.
|
|
|
Post by agedhippie on Jan 23, 2016 13:35:59 GMT -5
I don't believe it will explode although I definitely believe it will get better. I pay the same for insulin regardless of the price the insurer pays so cutting the price may benefit the insurer but it doesn't help me. Where it does help is that it may make getting into tier 2 faster which then makes it possible for doctors to prescribe it. Whether they will prescribe it is another thing, I think they will but slowly for a while until they are comfortable with it. AgedH, do you think Mnkd is coordinating the price cuts with insurance / others to optimize getting the word out and possible accelerating move to Tier 2? I suppose they only review Qtly or so, but it seems this needs to be planned versus just announced. Absolutely. This needs to be choreographed for the maximum impact. I would rather they took the time to negotiate tier 2 status with the insurers in return for a price cut. Just announcing a price cut for the sake of it and getting nothing in return is just going to get slammed both because it looks naive, and because you are giving away revenue for no return.
|
|