|
|
Post by dreamboatcruise on Jan 28, 2016 2:40:52 GMT -5
And why the excitement about the Qualcomm/Novartis deal... I don't think Novartis got any money out of it. That would be a short lived pop for MNKD if there were one from announcement that MNKD was building bluetooth into dreamboat in cooperation with Qualcomm. It's even less than that! Novartis and Qualcomm are spending money to establish this alliance, $100 million. There was a separate deal a while back for Qualcomm to produce a module for a coming smart COPD inhaler from Novartis (expected 2019). Novartis has also licensed Google's smart contact lens technology although that is a long way from commercial status. The common thing is that these are all about devices, not drugs. Google is not going to invest in MNKD because they do not sell devices that produce data. Wake me up in 2018. |
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Jan 28, 2016 9:22:25 GMT -5
55$ a share for a buyout?
Expensive?
No just plain delusional.
|
|
|
|
Post by kbrion77 on Jan 28, 2016 9:23:25 GMT -5
Wake me up in 2 months with $8-$12 buy out price.... Wake me in 10 years when Mannkind Technologies has licensed out both its Technosphere technology and also 6 Technosphere products and generating $5BN in annual sales.... |
|
|
|
Post by afrezzamiracle on Jan 28, 2016 9:28:24 GMT -5
The answer to your question: YES, $55 are expensive! ROTFLMFAO.  ? |
|
|
|
Post by longinvstr on Jan 28, 2016 12:41:09 GMT -5
It's even less than that! Novartis and Qualcomm are spending money to establish this alliance, $100 million. There was a separate deal a while back for Qualcomm to produce a module for a coming smart COPD inhaler from Novartis (expected 2019). Novartis has also licensed Google's smart contact lens technology although that is a long way from commercial status. The common thing is that these are all about devices, not drugs. Google is not going to invest in MNKD because they do not sell devices that produce data. I believe that line belongs to Rip Van Potsandpans. I'm with you tho, if it weren't so damn intriguing, I'd nap it off too. I just hope that timeline to success doesn't require cryogenics |
|
|
|
Post by esstan2001 on Jan 28, 2016 12:44:38 GMT -5
I believe that line belongs to Rip Van Potsandpans. I'm with you tho, if it weren't so damn intriguing, I'd nap it off too. I just hope that timeline to success doesn't require cryogenics maybe you should change your name to Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggginvstr then. |
|
|
|
Post by longinvstr on Jan 28, 2016 13:33:58 GMT -5
I believe that line belongs to Rip Van Potsandpans. I'm with you tho, if it weren't so damn intriguing, I'd nap it off too. I just hope that timeline to success doesn't require cryogenics maybe you should change your name to Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggginvstr then. Not a bad idea ... and, if i use zero's instead of o's, it works from an ROI angle too  |
|
marsie
Lab Rat
computer programmer
Posts: 26 
|
Post by marsie on Jan 30, 2016 22:49:10 GMT -5
When someone says he is more an abstract thinker than Einstein, more good look than sean o'pry, better speaker than Clinton, kinder than Mother Teresa.
None would take you seriously even though you are smart, handsome and kind.
Please stop when MNKD share price is below 1.
You make me sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by jpg on Jan 31, 2016 12:35:04 GMT -5
When someone says he is more an abstract thinker than Einstein, more good look than sean o'pry, better speaker than Clinton, kinder than Mother Teresa. None would take you seriously even though you are smart, handsome and kind. Please stop when MNKD share price is below 1. You make me sad. Read mother Theresa's history (as seen by those who worked under her and not doctrine). Kind isn't exactly the first thing that comes to mind... Tough religious 'love' maybe but kindness: no. This said I certainly agree with your overall concept! |
|
?
